similar to: panel data

Hola, paso el mini programita q estoy viendo, lo q me llama la atencion es una parte donde se definen las funciones. Probe primero meter adentro del boots la estadistica a estimar usando directamente gini(varible, pesos) pero no me dejo. Vi q en el ej del manual de boots, siempre define antes la funcion, entonces probe definir antes una funcion haciendo grini<-function(x) {gini(variable,

Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant simplification. There are still some issues with this patch, but does the approach look sane? -Eli -------------- next part -------------- Index: lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorOps.cpp

Hola Ivan gracias por tu ayuda, justo ayer a ultima hora hice una modificacion en el programa q hizo q el programita ande, aunq no entendi porque lo hizo. La modificacion fue agregar "*w" al final de cada parametro en la definicion de la funcion "grini" q habia creado, cosa q deduje de mirar la funcion q le habia robado al ejemplo del manual de boot ratio <- function(d, w)

Hi everybody, If I am correct, you can compare a model with random effect with the same model without the random effect by using the nlme function, like this: no.random.model <- gls(Richness ~ NAP * fExp, method = "REML", data = RIKZ) random.model <- lme(Richness ~NAP * fExp, data = RIKZ, random = ~1 | fBeach, method = "REML")

Hello, I am having trouble getting the output from the tapply function formatted so that it can be made into a nice table. Below is my question written in R code. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thank you. Geoff #Input the data; name <- c('Tom', 'Tom', 'Jane', 'Jane', 'Enzo', 'Enzo', 'Mary', 'Mary'); year <- c(2008, 2009,

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? > I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would > mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction > and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you > anticipating something more

On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman > <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector >> >> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from >> >> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector > operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from > LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant > simplification.  There are still some issues with this patch, but does > the approach

hi Geoffrey, Since you are saying it happens on all types of volumes, lets do the following: 1) Create a dist-repl volume 2) Set the options etc you need. 3) enable gluster volume profile using "gluster volume profile <volname> start" 4) run the work load 5) give output of "gluster volume profile <volname> info" Repeat the steps above on new and old

LLVM builds with me on the release_33 branch, but fails on trunk. I bisected the problem to this commit: commit b49fb7bcd5001567d2da06f6a6e1c7ba79649e1b Author: Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> Date: Wed Aug 14 23:15:39 2013 +0000 [llvm-build] Make Py3 compatible. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk at 188424 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

False Positives I just discovered how easy it was to create a false positive when I, trying my first RSpec test, did this: ob.should eql?(''foo'') instead of: ob.should eql(''foo'') or: ob.should == ''foo'' As far as I can see, this is roughly equivalent to: ob.should false Neither eql?(''foo'') nor false causes the spec

Hi Everyone, I want to generate some random numbers according to some empirical distribution. Therefore I am looking for the inverse of an empirical cumulative distribution function. I haven't found any in R. Can anyone give a pointer? Thanks, Geoffrey _______________________________________________________=0A= =0A= =0A= The information in this email or in any file attached

Hi Was just using have_tag on an xml response and found the problem outlined and resolved here http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2007/1/4/assert_xml_select Just wondered if there is any support in rspec? Cheers Shane Shane Mingins ELC Technologies (TM) PO Box 247 Santa Barbara, CA 93102 Phone: +64 4 568 6684 Mobile: +64 21 435 586 Email: smingins at elctech.com AIM: ShaneMingins Skype:

Hi! I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html formatter/report? The current html report is nice and green but what about to go a little silly and enable also user input. For example to let customer to add a new pending spec, comments etc. I feel it might be mentally easier for some customers to jump into spec world when it is possible to give input at "the same

Having used JUnit and Test::Unit, I''m quite used to having the ability to insert a failure message, which helps when tests fail. For instance, the example RSpec that is generated for a model class specifies that the model class is valid. Assuming this were supposed to be true, and it failed, I''ve now got to duplicate the code in the test in order to find out why it

Hello, does anyone know how to take the mean for a subset of observations? For example, suppose my data looks like this: OBS NAME SCORE 1 Tom 92 2 Tom 88 3 Tom 56 4 James 85 5 James 75 6 James 32 7 Dawn 56 8 Dawn 91 9 Clara 95 10 Clara 84 Is there a way to get

I was planning on using a fixture within a description that didn''t modify the fixture, so I put it in a before(:all) block: describe "Customer", "xml" do fixtures :customers before(:all) do one = customers(:one) end # ... As a result, I got this message: 1) NoMethodError in ''Customer xml before(:all)'' You have a nil object when you

Okay, I've traced it to a bug in configparser, which on my python 2.7.4 system is a backport of configparser from python 3. Here is a clean patch that works around the problem. Geoffrey On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us> wrote: > LLVM builds with me on the release_33 branch, but fails on trunk. I > bisected the problem to this commit: > >

Hi Everyone, I am stuck with a simple problem. Suppose I have a vector x, and I want to calculate y[i]=3Dx[i+1]-x[i], it is very easy. I just need to write y<-x[2:length(x)]-x[1:length(x)-1]. Now if I know y, and want to know the vector x defined by x[i]=3Dx[i-1]+y[i-1] for all i, how can I do this without a loop? Thanks, Geoffrey PS. Sorry if you see a duplicate message. The previous

Does anyone know of any RSpec screencasts for dummies, like me :) I have a Java background, but I have never written a java test in my life. I''ve never learned about TDD or BDD so I''m totally blank on everything that has anything to do with testing and stuff. Where should I start?!? ;) Christian... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this