similar to: Suppressing scientific notation on plot axis tick labels

On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: > Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. > >> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than ???scipen??? digits >> wider. > > However, > > options(scipen = 50) > x = c(1e7, 2e7) > barplot(x) > > still does not produce the desired result. This is strange. I see what

murdoch at stats.uwo.ca wrote: > On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: >> Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. >> >>> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than =C3=A2=E2=82=AC= =CB=9Cscipen=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2 digits >>> wider. >> However,=20 >> >> options(scipen =3D 50) >> x =3D

R gurus, Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help. The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c : if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */ where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number

The labels on the x-axis are defaulting to scientific notation no matter how small cex.axis is. How can I override scientific notation to get the labels to print out as specified? Here is the code (UNIT here is 0.0105): plot(xm,yv,log="xy",ylim=c(0.1,20)/UNIT,xlim=c(0.004,20)*UNIT,xaxt="n",t ype="n") axis(1,

I'm trying to display my deciles without scientific notation, but have not found an option that will allow me to do so. According to web searches, the options(scipen=999) should remove scientific notation, but it seems not too. Does this option work with quantcut function? Is there any other option that can be used? I am using verison 2.10.0. library(gtools) library(gdata)

Sorry for asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find the answer through a search... How can I get R to show me the values of estimates *not* in scientific notation? When I use summary() after using lm() I am getting numbers like 4.485107e-01, when what I want to see is 0.4485.... Thanks, Brian

Dear List: Below is how I specify an axis: axis(2, at=c(0.00005, 0.0005)) R displays the numbers in scientific notation. What argument/parameter should I use to tell R to display the numbers as specified rather than in scientific notation? > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major

Dear R users: I assigned students to make some graphs and I'm having trouble answering some questions that they have. We are all working on R 2.1 on Fedora Core Linux 4 systems. 1. In the plot, the axis is not labeled by "numbers", but rather scientific notation like "-2e+08" or such. We realize that means -200,000,000. We want to beautify the plot. We would rather

Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T) argument. For example: xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T)) But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation? options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot() Thanks John

Dear Help-Rs,   I'm working with a file that contains large numbers and I need to export them "as is".  for example take:   x <- c(27104010002005,27104020001805,27104090001810,90050013000140,90050013000120) y <- c(1:5) df <- data.frame(cbind(x,y))   When I then try a simple: write.csv(df,file="df.csv")   I get:  x y 1 2.7104E+13 1 2 2.7104E+13 2 3 2.71041E+13 3

R developers, Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so it's not limited to my box at least. I see the problem in both R 3.5.3 and R 3.3.2. options(scipen=-100) prettyNum(1, digits=0) [1] "%#4.0-1e" prettyNum(2,

Moving from S-plus to R I encountered many great features and a much more stable system. Currently, I am left with 2 problems that are handled differently: 1) I did lots of "overplots" in S-Plus using par(new=T,xaxs='d',yaxs='d') to fix the axes ->What is the workaround in R ? 2) In S-Plus I could fix "scientific notation" or "normal notation" in

Hi, I was working on a project for my class and I am trying to make sure the y-axis numbers NEVER convert automatically to scientific notation. Is there anything I can set in the plot function to make sure of this? I know formatC( ) can be used in the axis function, but it seems to give me an error when using it in the plot function. Thanks, student-in-need-of-some-help

FWIW, it doesn't seem to be happening on Mac OS: > format(2^30, digits=0) [1] "1.e+09" > prettyNum(12345.6, digits=0) [1] "1.e+04" A glibc misfeature? -pd > On 22 Mar 2019, at 10:10 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > Thank you, Robert for raising this here ! > >>>>>> Robert McGehee

I am trying to suppress the tick labels on the x-axis of the following: barchart(richness[Wood=="V"]~Sample[Wood=="V"]) I have tried col.axis="white" I have tried removing the axis all together with axes=FALSE I have tried xaxt="n" I have also tried labels=c"(label1", "label2") to replace the default labels, based on reading that the

Hello, A small problem I can't solve > p <- 0.0001 > p [1] 1e-04 How can I force the printout of p to 0.0001? I have tried 'format', 'round', 'signif', 'print' in different combinations without success. Fredrik Lundgren

Thank you, Robert for raising this here ! >>>>> Robert McGehee >>>>> on Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:56:19 +0000 writes: > R developers, > Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so

>>>>> peter dalgaard >>>>> on Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:30:19 +0100 writes: > FWIW, it doesn't seem to be happening on Mac OS: >> format(2^30, digits=0) > [1] "1.e+09" >> prettyNum(12345.6, digits=0) > [1] "1.e+04" > A glibc misfeature? It seems (and note we are talking about format.default()

I've been trying to figure out a parameter that will let you separately adjust the parameters for the axis line from the tick mark. In the following example, I would like to suppress the axis line, but keep the tick marks. Thanks, Andrew foo <- data.frame(x=1:3, y=4:6) plot(foo$x, foo$y, type="n", axes=F) points(foo$x, foo$y) axis(side=1, at=foo$x, lty=0) #would like to figure

Hello R users, I am a bit puzzled by the fact that options(digits=22) x0 <- 69880 y0 <- 26185 x1 <- 69600 y1 <- 22937 number <- paste(x0,y0,x1,y1,sep="") number <- as.numeric(travel) print(number) gives number in scientific notation (some precision is wasted by having a "e+19" at the tail): 6.988026185696e+19 but print(exp(log(number))) gives the