similar to: Extracing only Unique Rows based on only 1 Column

Greetings listeRs - Given a data frame such as times time1 time2 time3 time4 1 70.408543 48.92378 7.399605 95.93050 2 17.231940 27.48530 82.962916 10.20619 3 20.279220 10.33575 66.209290 30.71846 4 NA 53.31993 12.398237 35.65782 5 9.295965 NA 48.929201 NA 6 63.966518 42.16304 1.777342 NA one can use "transform" to

Hi r users, I have two data sets (X1, X2). For example, time1<-c( 0, 8, 15, 22, 43, 64, 85, 106, 127, 148, 169, 190 ,211 ) outpue1<-c(171 ,164 ,150 ,141 ,109 , 73 , 47 ,26 ,15 ,12 ,6 ,2 ,1 ) X1<-cbind(time1,outpue1) time2<-c( 0 ,8 ,15 , 22 ,43 , 64 ,85 ,106 ,148) output2<-c( 5 ,5 ,4 ,5 ,5 ,4 ,1 ,2 , 1 ) X2<-cbind(time2,output2) I want to

Hi, I would like to merge two data frames. It is just that I want the merging to be done with some kind of a fuzzy criterion. Let me explain. My first data frame looks like this : ID1 time1 dt 1 2008-01-02 13:11 10 2 2008-01-02 14:20 20 3

Hello all, I've 2 strings that representing the start and end values of a date and time. For example, time1 <- c("21/04/2005","23/05/2005","11/04/2005") time2 <- c("15/07/2009", "03/06/2008", "15/10/2005") as.difftime(time1,time2) Time differences in secs [1] NA NA NA attr(,"tzone") [1] "" How can i

Hello, Below is the code for a basic bar graph. I was seeking advice regarding the following: (a) For each time period there are values from 16 people. How I can change the colour value so that each person has a different colour, which recurs across each of the three graphs/tie epriods? (b) I have seen much more sophisticated examples using lattice (e.g each person has a separate

Hi all I am running a 2-way repeated measure anova with 1 between-subjects factor (Group=treatment, control), and 1 within-subject factor (Time of measurement: time1, time2). I extract the results of the anova with: summary(aov(effect ~ Group*Time + Error=Subj/Time, data=mydata)) Now, this must be clearly a dumb question, but how can I quickly extract in R all the post-hoc t-tests for the

Further pursuing my curiosity to measure the efficiency of R/C++ interface, I conducted a simple matrix-vector multiplication test using .C and .Call functions in R. In each case, I measured the execution time in R, as well as inside the C++ function. Subtracting the two, I came up with a measure of overhead associated with each call. I assume that this overhead would be non-existent of the entire

Thanks John, this is an easy way to achieve this goal, but I'm wondering if this is the only way? I have around 100 passes. Quoting John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu>: > On 6/28/11 11:35 PM, kecheng at cecs.pdx.edu wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Llvm can automatically group a list passes. I want to do some >> experiment to see the difference between grouping

Dear All, what determines if a difference between POSIXct objects gets expressed in days or seconds? In the following example, it's sometimes seconds, sometimes days. as.POSIXct('2009-09-01') - as.POSIXct(NA) Time difference of NA secs c(as.POSIXct('2009-09-01'), as.POSIXct(NA)) - c(as.POSIXct('2009-09-01'), as.POSIXct('2009-08-31')) Time differences in

hello: my data looks like: time1  time2   event  catagoria 2004    2006        1            C 2004    2005        0            C 2005    2010        1            E 2007    2009        1            C 2006    2007        0            E 2008    2010        0            C 2008    2010        1            E ... and the census interval is 1 year I have tried  this

Dear list-members I am new to R and a statistics beginner. I really like the ease with which I can extract and manipulate data in R, and would like to use it primarily. I've been learning by checking analyses that have already been run in SAS. In an experiment with Y being a response variable, and group a 2-level between-subject factor, and time a 5-level within-subject factor. 2

Dear All,   #I have the following code   Dose<-1000 Tinf <-0.5 INTERVAL <-8 TIME8 <-matrix(c((0*INTERVAL):(1*INTERVAL))) TIME7 <-matrix(c((0*INTERVAL):(2*INTERVAL))) TIME6 <-matrix(c((0*INTERVAL):(3*INTERVAL))) TIME5 <-matrix(c((0*INTERVAL):(4*INTERVAL))) TIME4 <-matrix(c((0*INTERVAL):(5*INTERVAL))) TIME3 <-matrix(c((0*INTERVAL):(6*INTERVAL))) TIME2

I'm trying to fit a Cox proportional hazards model to some hospital admission data. About 25% of the patients have had at least one admission, and of these, 40% have had two admissions within the 12 month period of the study. Each patients has had one of 4 treatments, and one of the treatment groups has had no admissions for the period. I used:

Dear all, I would like to have all unique combinations in the following matrix TimeIndex<- rbind (c(1,"Week_of_21_07-29_03"),           c(2,"Thursday_21_03"),           c(3,"Friday_22_03"),           c(4,"Saturday_23_03"),           c(5,"Sunday_24_03"),           c(6,"Monday_25_03"),           c(7,"Tuesday_26_03"),        

Hi Everyone, I have data in a long format e.g. there is one row per patient but each follow-up appointment is included in the row. So, a snippet of the data looks like this: TrialNo Drug Sex Rand Adate1 Date1 Dose1 Time1 Adate2 Date2 Dose2 Time2 B1001029 LTG M 15719 30/04/2003 15825 150 106 29/08/2003 15946 200 227 B1117003 LTG M 15734 30/04/2003 15825 200 91 03/09/2003 15951 250 217

time1 = 2008-03-09 time2 = 2010-9-10 How to compute how many years between time1 and time2? Thanks! best [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

For a model I am working on, I have samples organized by year and week of the year. For this model, the data (year and week) comes from the basic sample data, but I require a value representing the amount of time since the sample was taken (actually, for the purpose of the model, it is sufficient to use the number of weeks from the middle of the sample week to the present). What I have found so

Hi all, I'm just curious how memory management works in R... I need to run an optimization that keeps calling the same function with a large set of parameters... so then I start to wonder if it's better if I attach the variables first vs passing them in (coz that involves a lot of copying.. ) Thus, I do this fn3 <- function(x, y, z, a, b, c){ sum(x, y, z, a, b, c) } fn4 <-

Dear list, I´m calculating time differences between series of time stamps and I noticed something odd: If I do this... > time1=strptime("2009 05 31 22 57 00",format="%Y %m %d %H %M") > time2=strptime("2009 05 31 23 07 00",format="%Y %m %d %H %M") > > diff(c(time1,time2),units="mins") Time difference of 10 mins .. I get the correct

Hi All, I have a data frame: Time1 Time2 1 176:46:10 41:48:06 2 171:28:57 61:19:10 3 178:25:15 34:05:35 4 74:04:20 25:01:55 5 136:11:20 37:59:32 6 138:17:17 30:22:27 7 183:04:48 29:25:02 8 179:35:01 19:29:44 > str(df) 'data.frame': 8 obs. of 2 variables: $ Time1: Factor w/ 583 levels