similar to: Sweave - How to use local objects in code chunks

Estimados -Este paquete parece que saca un reporte bastante completo, a mi me da error y no comprendo porque,por favor audenme en esto library(DataExplorer) create_report(iris) create_report(airquality, y = "Ozone") error que me da Error: pandoc document conversion failed with error 99 TENGO INSTALADO PANDOC

Hola, parece que el problema está relacionado con la versión de Pandoc. La última da problemas, según parece: https://github.com/boxuancui/DataExplorer/issues/119 DataExplorer failed on the iris and mtcars data.frames on 3 of 4 computers today. It took hours, but the problem seems related to newer versions of Pandoc. Only Pandoc 2.6 works with DataExplorer. It will fail with newer versions 2.7

1st: I am a newbie to Rails & to pure OO. Q: I want to use rails for creating a "master-detail" form. page layout will allow users to type in an "expense report header" and as many "expense report lines" as they need to. I understand how to wrap the final submit action using "transaction" to ensure the inserts to the database happen within the same

I have been going around on the Internet about this all day and found absolutely nothing that seems to fit this problem. I have a mailer named "Notifier" -- in fact I have been using the EXACT code from the "Agile Development With Rails" chapter on "Sending E-Mail", pp. 411-416, except for my names (mailer named "Notifier", emailer method named

Hi, I have a RAID 1 (using mdadm) on CentOS Linux and in /proc/mdstat I see this: md7 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1] 26627648 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md1 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md2 : active raid1 sda5[0] sdb5[1] 4192832 blocks [2/2] [UU] [-->> it's OK] md3 : active raid1 sdb6[1] sda6[0] 4192832 blocks [2/2]

Hi R mailing list Does anyone know of a good way to conditionally evaluate R code chunks when Sweaveing? What I'd kind of like to be able to do is set a number of variables in a list and if variable.a=TRUE then process code chunk labelled "methodA", if variable.b=TRUE then process code chunk labelled "methodB" etc <<label=setvars>>= variable.a <- TRUE

Hi, We are using Solaris 10 update 7 with ZFS file system.And using the machine for informix db. Solaris Patch level Generic_142900-02 (Dec 09 PatchCluster release) Informix DB version 11.5FC6 We are facing an issue while enabling DIRECT_IO for the DB chunks. The error message which appears in the online.log file is "Direct I/O cannot be used for the chunk file <file_name>"

Hi, is there a way to collapse/expand the Sweave chunks? Best Riccardo

You might want to take a look at the op_open_callbacks API: https://opus-codec.org/docs/opusfile_api-0.7/group__stream__open__close.html#ga5b81c0b685f3d3c9c7d7091e5536c759 libopusfile will only call your provided read() function as needed. If you don't implement the seeking functions, it will only read it in a linear order. On 04/06/2018 09:08 AM, Chris McGowan wrote: > I would like to

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=916 Summary: SFTP over SSH died after roughly 20MB when asking for >64k chunks Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=916 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2005-01-27 18:05 ------- Does the patch in bug #896 resolve the problem? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

--- "David W. Tamkin" <dattier@panix.com> wrote: > If another program invokes flac.exe to encode a WAV file that has an > extra chunk or sub-chunk that FLAC strips it out during encoding, > would > that make flac.exe report a non-zero error level back to the program > that called it? No. It's not considered an error to skip non-audio sub-chunks. Josh

Hi everyone, I was wondering if someone could shed some light on encoding chunks of PCM data rather than files. My starting point is pretty much that of vorb_enc.dll by Andy Kay and the encoder_example.c from vorbis 1.0 distribution. From what I gather encoder setup goes through fine, but when I get a PCM chunk to encode, I can't get past uninterleaving samples, it seems to die with

My question is: is there a way for Rtangle() to *not* print re-used code chunks? It'd be easy enough to brew up a perl script to do just this, but if methods exist already, I'd rather use them. My reading of the help pages and FAQs has missed something, if it's there. Background: I have course notes on R, written using Sweave. I want to provide the R code separately so the

Hello all, I?m trying to take a huge dataset (1.5 GB) and separate it into smaller chunks with R. So far I had nothing but problems. I cannot load the whole dataset in R due to memory problems. So, I instead try to load a few (100000) lines at a time (with read.table). However, R kept crashing (with no error message) at about the 6800000 line. This is extremely frustrating. To try to fix

Hi all, Using Beamer, in order to highlight a piece of R code I do something like this - note the "\structure" and "\alert" commands: \begin{semiverbatim} > mleOut <- \structure{dlmMLE}(Nile, + parm = c(0.2, 120), # initial values for optimizer + lower = c(1e-7, 0)) \alert<2>{# V must be positive} > mleOut$convergence

This deadlock comes from xfstests 251. We''ll hold the chunk_mutex throughout the whole of a chunk allocation. But if we find that we''ve used up system chunk space, we need to allocate a new system chunk, but this will lead to a recursion of chunk allocation and end up with a deadlock on chunk_mutex. So instead we need to allocate the system chunk first if we find we''re

The NBD spec requires that a server doing structured reads must not succeed unless it covers the entire buffer with reply chunks. In the general case, this requires a lot of bookkeeping to check whether offsets were non-overlapping and sufficient, and we'd rather defer such checking to an optional callback function. But a callback function will only be reached per chunk, while we still want to

Hi, following issue: Sweave is running the R code to generate figures three times under standard behaviour, twice if run with eps=FALSE, once if run with eps=FALSE,pdf=FALSE. However, ideally, I'd want it to run once to generate pds with eps=FALSE being set. How come this isn't so? Am I missing something? Basically, my R figure code is expensive to run. I can of course move the

Perhaps x <- split(x, x == 0) Best, Ista On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Sidoti, Salvatore A. <sidoti.23 at buckeyemail.osu.edu> wrote: > Greetings! > > I have several large data sets of animal movements. Their pauses (zero magnitude vectors) are of particular interest in addition to the speed distributions that precede the periods of rest. Here is an example of the kind of