similar to: svm

Hi, Could you please tell me whether SVM can do multiple regression or not? Cheers, Amy _________________________________________________________________ Browse profiles for FREE! Meet local singles online. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Could you please explain the line that I got from the documentation of R? does it mean that there is a difference between using and not using the formula interface with SVM ?: If the predictor variables include factors, the formula interface must be used to get a correct model matrix. Cheers, Amy _________________________________________________________________ View photos of

hi, could you please tell me what kind of cross validation that SVM of e1071 uses? Cheers, Amy _________________________________________________________________ View photos of singles in your area! Looking for a hot date? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi everybody, I am using the contour function to draw isobares. And i would like to to bold contours for an interval of 500m and weak contour for an interval of 100m. Can someone help me with this? Thanks a lot Karine _________________________________________________________________ [[elided Hotmail spam]] [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, Could you please tell me whether there is a difference in the result of svm when using formula instead of class label? Cheers, Amy _________________________________________________________________ Browse profiles for FREE! Meet local singles online. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

If do: > library("e1071") > example(svm) I get: svm> data(iris) svm> attach(iris) svm> ## classification mode svm> # default with factor response: svm> model <- svm(Species ~ ., data = iris) svm> # alternatively the traditional interface: svm> x <- subset(iris, select = -Species) svm> y <- Species svm> model <- svm(x, y) svm>

Full_Name: Julien Gagneur Version: 2.2.1 OS: Linux (Suse 9.3) Submission from: (NULL) (194.94.44.4) Using the SparseM library (SparseM_0.66) and the e1071 library (e1071_1.5-12) I fail using svm method with a sparse matrix. Here is a sample example. I experienced the same problem under Windows. > library(SparseM) [1] "SparseM library loaded" > library("e1071")

I am using SVM to classify categorical data and I would like the probabilities instead of the classification. ?predict.svm says that its only enabled when you train the model with it enabled, so I did that, but it didn't work. I can't even get it to work with iris. The help file shows that probability = TRUE when training the model, but doesn't show an example. Then I try to

Hi ! Right now I am learning to use svm functions available in R and trying to use these function with given example. I was stuck with svmlight function which is available in klaR package. Any help would be appreciated regarding this function. 1. I am unable to use svmlight( ) which is available in package: klaR. Although I have downloaded klaR_0.6-3 package from

Hi All, I'm attempting to use eps-regression or nu-regression SVM to compute probabilities but the predict function applied to an svm model object returns values outside [0, 1]: Variable Data looks like: Present X02 X03 X05 X06 X07 X13 X14 X15 X18 1 0 1634 48 2245.469 -1122.0750 3367.544 11105.013 2017.306 40 23227 2 0 1402 40 2611.519 -811.2500 3422.769 10499.425 1800.475 40 13822 3 0 1379

Dear R:ers, I'm using the svm from the e1071 package to train a model with the option "probabilities = TRUE". I then use "predict" with "probabilities = TRUE" and get the probabilities for the data point belonging to either class. So far all is well. My question is why I get different results each time I train the model, although I use exactly the same data.

Hi, Guys I run one simple R script like this library(e1071) data(iris) attach(iris) model <- svm (Species~., data=iris) The R version is 1.4.1. The OS is standard redhat 7.2. Then I got a segmentation fault like this (run through R CMD BATCH scriptName) /usr/local/R/lib/R/bin/BATCH: line 54: 28513 Done ( echo "invisible(options(echo = TRUE))"; cat

Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?... Nom : non disponible URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120329/cfdd2be3/attachment.pl>

Hello, I'm using the e1071 library for SVM functions. I can quickly train an SVM with: svm(formula = label ~ ., data = testdata) That works well. I want to tune the parameters, so I tried: tune.svm(label ~ ., data=testdata[1:2000, ], gamma=10^(-6:3), cost=10^(1:2)) THIS FAILS WITH AN ERROR: 'names' attribute [199] must be the same length as the vector [184] I don't

svm.fit<-svm(as.factor(out) ~ ., data=all_h, method="C-classification", kernel="radial", cost=bestc, gamma=bestg, cross=10) # model fitting svm.pred<-predict(svm.fit, hh, decision.values = TRUE, probability = TRUE) # find the probability, but can not find. attr(svm.pred, "probabilities") > attr(svm.pred, "probabilities") 1 0 1 0 0 2 0

> x <- train[,c( 2:18, 20:21, 24, 27:31)] > y <- train$out > > svm.pr <- svm(x, y, probability = TRUE, method="C-classification", kernel="radial", cost=bestc, gamma=bestg, cross=10) > > pred <- predict(svm.pr, valid[,c( 2:18, 20:21, 24, 27:31)], decision.values = TRUE, probability = TRUE) > attr(pred, "decision.values")[1:4,]

I am trying to understand what is the difference between linear and polynomial kernel: linear: u'*v polynomial: (gamma*u'*v + coef0)^degree It would seem that polynomial kernel with gamma = 1; coef0 = 0 and degree = 1 should be identical to linear kernel, however it gives me significantly different results for very simple data set, with linear kernel

Hi, I have a question about the parameter C (cost) in svm function in e1071. I thought larger C is prone to overfitting than smaller C, and hence leads to more support vectors. However, using the Wisconsin breast cancer example on the link: http://planatscher.net/svmtut/svmtut.html I found that the largest cost have fewest support vectors, which is contrary to what I think. please see the scripts

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:20:45 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Was the certificate path bundled in the server certificate? No, as a separate file, provided from the local (intermediate) CA: ssl_cert = </etc/openssl/certs/server.cert ssl_key = </etc/openssl/private/server.key ssl_ca = </etc/openssl/certs/ca-cert-chain.pem Worked fine with 2.2.x, 2.3 gives % openssl s_client -connect XXX:993

Dear All , 1- I'm trying to access the values of fitted(model) after model<- tune.svm( ) but seemingly it is not poosible. How can I access to values of fitted ? However ,it is possible only after model<- svm( ) 2- How can I access to the other values such as the number of Support Vectors , gamma, cost , nu , epsilon , after model<- tune.svm( ) ? these are not possible? I