similar to: How to uninstall R packages

Hi, R Users I find a problem in extracting the R-squared and P-value from the lm results described below (in Italic), *Residual standard error: 2.25 on 17 degrees of freedom* *Multiple R-squared: 0.001069, Adjusted R-squared: -0.05769 * *F-statistic: 0.01819 on 1 and 17 DF, p-value: 0.8943 * * * Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thanks. Wenjun [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi R Users, When I use package lme4 for mixed model analysis, I can't distinguish the significant and insignificant variables from all random independent variables. Here is my data and result: Data: Rice<-data.frame(Yield=c(8,7,4,9,7,6,9,8,8,8,7,5,9,9,5,7,7,8,8,8,4,8,6,4,8,8,9), Variety=rep(rep(c("A1","A2","A3"),each=3),3),

Hi, R Users, Can maintainer rename the package on F-Forge? Any suggestions will be appreciated. Wenjun -- Wenjun [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi R Users, I want to distinguish different condition by different symbols by pch in function grid.points, but the symbols needed should be with solid or hollow, in this way only 21 to 25 in pch worked, is there any other symbols could be used like this? or does it exist any other way to draw symbols? Any suggestions will be appreciated. Best regards. -- Wenjun [[alternative HTML

Hi R Users, When I use package nlme for linear model with random effects, there exists errors and I don't know the data structure of lme. Here is my data: Rice<-data.frame(Yield=c(8,7,4,9,7,6,9,8,8,8,7,5,9,9,5,7,7,8,8,8,4,8,6,4,8,8,9), Variety=rep(rep(c("A1","A2","A3"),each=3),3),

Hi all, I have successfully compiled the libguestfs-1.0.89 source and 'make install'ed on my Fedora 12 box. Everything went fine. I have ocaml installed so the default configuration enabled ocaml binding. then I found some minimal configure mistake with my compilation and wanted to compile and install again. 1.first I made uninstall and cleaned up everthing: $ make uninstall $ make clean

My long-promised Rdsm package is now on CRAN. Some of you may recall that I made a prototype available on my own Web page last July. This is the official version, much evolved since I released the prototype. The CRAN description states: Provides a threads-like programming environment for R, usable both on a multicore machine and across a network of multiple machines. The package

Dear All, 1. why did the problem happen? 2. How to solve it? -- Best wishes, Zhijiang Wang -------------------------------------------- PHD Student Room 212, Science buliding, The International WIC Institute, College of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.

Fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF; generated by INTO) and int 3(#BP) instruction emulation. For INTn (CD ib), it should use type 4 (software interrupt). For INT3 (CC; NOT CD ib with ib=3) and INTO (CE; NOT CD ib with ib=4), it should use type 6 (software exception). For other exceptions (#DE, #DB, #BR, #UD, #NM, #TS, #NP, #SS, #GP, #PF, #MF, #AC, #MC, and #XM), it

I'm sorry that I should remove the comment. In fact my question is about the "float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*", why we use this kind of return type instead of just "float (i32)*". Thanks a lot. Hao On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> %4 = call float (i32)* (float (i32)*)* @get_ptr(float (i32)* @a1)

"float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*" is not a return type. According to the description of the 'call' instruction in LLVM Assembly Language Reference Manual (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_call) this is a signature of the pointer to function value being invoked (which includes the return type). In your case the full signature is printed because get_ptr returns a pointer to

Changes from v1: - Define new struct hvm_trap to represent information of trap, include instruction length. - Renames hvm_inject_exception to hvm_inject_trap. Then define a couple of wrappers around that function for existing callers, so that their parameter lists actually *shrink*. This series of patches fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF) and INT3(#BP),

This series of patches fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF) and INT3(#BP), INTn instruction emulation. Introduce new function vmx_inject_sw_exception() which deliver the software excetion, software interrupt and privileged software exception. Split hardware exception as a seperate function(old function vmx_inject_hw_exception()). Also Passed down intruction length

tools/firmware: remove "_PS0/3" Method Do not expose the ACPI power management "_PS0/3" Method to guest firmware. According to section 3.4 of the APCI specification 4.0, PCI device control the device power through its own specification but not through APCI. Qemu pushes "_PS0/3" to guest will cause a mess between ACPI PM and PCI PM as a result of incorrect ACPI table

Dear all, I compiled c program with llvm and found something strange with function pointer as following small example . ------------- In C Code -------------- float a (int value) { return value + 1; }; typedef float (*funcptr_t) (int); funcptr_t get_ptr(funcptr_t p) { return p; } float result = get_ptr(a)(4); ------------- In LLVM Code -------------- %4 = call float (i32)* (float

Hello, I have a vector (v) with 6 columns and 2000 rows. I am trying to do one sample t.test for each row (I know this sounds crazy) and put the p.values into the 7th column. I know I can access the p.value via t.test(v[i,])[3]$p.value; I know I can do t.test on the row by apply(v, 1, t.test), but I just couldn't figure out how to fit them together. I'd very appreciate your help!!

Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi

Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:19 PM, John Criswell <criswell at uiuc.edu> wrote: > SHEN Hao wrote: >> Thanks a lot for your answer. >> As what you said, I can not have any options to avoid generating this kind >> of intrinsic for byte code. Is it possible to modify gcc and ask it take >> all memset liked functions as a general function call? I know this solution

Hi there, I just found that if an user is assigned in the "admin users", and if the user grab a file from window to samba share, the file will be owned by root from unix view. I am believing this is a bug. The samba version I am using is 2.2.4. Weixing Hao (631) 858-6341 Forest Labs -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed