similar to: Replace NAs in a range of data frame columns

Dear all, I need to compute tensor product of B-spline defined over equi-spaced break-points. I wrote my own program (it works in a 2-dimensional setting) library(splines) # set the break-points Knots = seq(-1,1,length=10) # number of splines M = (length(Knots)-4)^2 # short cut to splineDesign function bspline = function(x) splineDesign(Knots,x,outer.ok = T) # bivariate tensor product of

Dear R-users, I learned today that there exists an interesting topic in numerical analysis names "best polynomial approximation" (BSA). Given a function f the BSA of degree k, say pk, is the polynomial such that pk=arginf sup(|f-pk|) Although given some regularity condition of f, pk is unique, pk IS NOT calculated with least square. A quick google tour show a rich field of research

Hi all, I am running a bivariate regression with the following: p1=c(184,155,676,67,922,22,76,24,39) p2=c(1845,1483,2287,367,1693,488,435,1782,745) I1=c(1530,1505,2505,204,2285,269,1271,298,2023) I2=c(8238,6247,6150,2748,4361,5549,2657,3533,5415) R1=I1-p1 R2=I2-p2 x1=cbind(p1,R1) y1=cbind(p2,R2) fit1=lm(y1~-1+x1) summary(fit1) Response 2: Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value

Hi, In order to use the mle2-function, one has to define the likelihood function itself. As we know, the likelihood function is a sum of the logarithm of probability density functions (pdf). I have implemented myself the pdfs that I am using. My problem is, that the pdfs values are negative and I cann't take the logarithm of them in the log-likelihood function. So how can one take the

Dear R-helpers, I'm having a problem in using plot.design in Design Library. Tho following example code produce the error: > n <- 1000 # define sample size > set.seed(17) # so can reproduce the results > age <- rnorm(n, 50, 10) > blood.pressure <- rnorm(n, 120, 15) > cholesterol <- rnorm(n, 200, 25) > sex <-

Hi, I would like to generate two correlated variables. I found that funktion for doing that: a <- rmvnorm(n=10000,mean=c(20,20),sigma=matrix(c(5,0.8*sqrt(50), 0.8*sqrt(50),10),2,2)) (using library(mvtnorm)) Now I also want to generate two correlated variables where the error variance vary over the variable-correlation. And I want to plot this for showing heteroscedasticity. Like shown

Hi, At each iteration in my program,I need to generate tree vectors,X1,X2,X3, from exponential distribution with parameters a1,a2,a3. Can you help me please how can I do it such that it take a little time? thank you khazaei

Dear group, Here are my objects in my environment: > ls() [1] "Pos100415" "Pos100416" "posA" "pose15" "pose16" "pose16t" "position" "trade" "x" I need to pass the object "Pos100415" to a function. This element is a data.frame, obtained through a function: Pos(x)<-myfun(x)

Hi R-users, I have this code to uniformise the data using gamma: > length(dp1) [1] 696 > dim(dp1) [1] 58 12 > dim(ahall) [1]  1 12 > dim(bhall) [1]  1 12 > trans_dt <- function(dt,a,b) + { n1 <- ncol(dt) +   n2 <- length(dt) +   trans  <- vector(mode='numeric', length=n2) +   dim(trans) <- dim(dt) +   for (i in 1:n1) +   {  dt[,i] <- as.vector(dt[,i])

Dear R Users, I am executing the following command to produce a line graph: matplot(aggregate_1986[,1], aggregate_1986[,2:3], type="l", col=2:3) On the x-axis I have values of Latitude (in column 1) ranging from -60 to +80 (left to right on the x-axis). However, I wish to have these values shown in reverse on the x-axis, going from +80 to -60 (ie. North to South in terms of Latitude).

Hi again! Suppose I have the following: > xy <- round(rexp(20),1) > xy [1] 0.1 3.4 1.6 0.4 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.3 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.0 2.0 0.9 2.5 0.1 1.5 0.4 > table(xy) xy 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.9 1 1.4 1.5 1.6 2 2.5 3.4 1 4 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 > Is there a way to set things up to have 0 - 0.4 0.5 - 0.9 etc. please? I know there is the cut

hi all, I have a data frame such as: 1 blue 0.3 1 NA 0.4 1 red NA 2 blue NA 2 green NA 2 blue NA 3 red 0.5 3 blue NA 3 NA 1.1 I wish to find the last non-missing value in every 3ple: ie I want a 3 by 3 data.frame such as: 1 red 0.4 2 blue NA 3 blue 1.1 I have written a little script data = structure(list(V1 = c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L ), V2 = structure(c(1L, NA,

Hi R, Let, x=1:80 I want to sum up first 8 elements of x, then again next 8 elements of x, then again another 8 elements..... So, my new vector should look like: c(36,100,164,228,292,356,420,484,548,612) I used: aggregate(x,list(rep(1:10,each=8)),sum)[-1] or rowsum(x,group=rep(1:10,each=8)) But without grouping, can I achieve the required? Any other ways of doing

For a function that takes an argument as a list of lists of parameters, I'd like to be able to convert that to a data.frame and vice versa, but can't quite figure out how. pats <- list(structure(list(shape = 0, shape.col = "black", shape.lty = 1, cell.fill = "white", back.fill = "white", label = 1, label.size = 1, ref.col = "gray80",

Hello, I am trying to plot a few correlograms on the same figure, with the function corrgram() from the package corrgram. However, the function does not seem to use the base graphic system, as setting out the multiple figure layout with, e.g., par(mfrow=c(2, 2,)) does not work. Does anybody know a workaround for this? Many thanks in advance for any advice best giuseppe -- Giuseppe Pagnoni,

Dear all, I am currently facing a problem related to the spatial autocorrelation of a sample of stations; these stations supply weekly data for a fixed time-window during the year (namely, 4-6 months per year). For this reason I'm trying to use the R package 'spdep' (specifically Moran's I) in order to get rid of it. Does anyone know how is it possible (if it is...) to

Dear all, I am estimating a mixed-model in Ubuntu Raring (13.04¸ amd64), with the code: fm0 <- lme(rt ~ run + group * stim * cond, random=list( subj=pdSymm(~ 1 + run), subj=pdSymm(~ 0 + stim)), data=mydat1) When I check the approximate variance-covariance matrix, I get: > fm0$apVar [1] "Non-positive definite

Dear all, I am having quite a hard time in trying to figure out how to correctly spell out a model in R (a repeated-measures anova with a within-subject covariate, I guess). Even though I have read in the posting guide that statistical advice may or may not get an answer on this list, I decided to try it anyway, hoping not to incur in somebody's ire for misusing the tool. For the sake of

Dear contributors I have tried this experiment: x<-c() for (i in 1:12){ x[i]<-list(cbind(x1[i],x2[i])) #this is a list of 12 couples of time series I am using to perform a test } # that compares them 2 by 2 # ################# #trace statistic test<-data.frame() cval<-array( , dim=c(2,3,12)) for (i in 2:12){ for (k in 1:2){ for (j in 1:3){ result[k,j,i]<-

Dear all, I use at least two pc to perform my data analysis. Both are powered with R updated at the latest release (currently 2.9.0 under windows xp pro). I bring .Rdata on my portable drive and use them on any of my pc (this worked also under (k)ubuntu equipped machines). Please notice that not all my pc have the same libraries installed. If a not installed library was called in .First() I got an