similar to: source() vs attach()0

The following looks like an 'eapply' bug to me: t/subtest> e <- new.env() t/subtest> e$tempo <- quote( 1+'hi') t/subtest> lapply( ls( e), function( x) length( get( x,e))) [[1]] [1] 3 # seems reasonable-- e$tempo is a 'call' object of length 3 t/subtest> eapply( e, length) Error in 1 + "hi" : non-numeric argument to binary operator

Hi, I have a very simple question, but I'm obviously not able to solve the problem on my own. I have a data.frame like sample(c("A","B","C"),size=20,replace = T)->type rnorm(20)->value data.frame(ty=type,val=value)->test There must be some built in functions, that will do some descriptive statistics with tabular output, in the end I like to have

as shown in the code, four variables input: diff_expr,diff_coex, klist, Pop_size, are included in the function. However, within the function, another variable "vector" is utilized in some subfunction. How they get its value? thx get_quantiles <-function(diff_expr,diff_coex,klist,pop_size){ ##### The function to get the "node_score_term" and "edge_score_term" of

Hello, I have strange problem with "losing" emails after rename mail folder(s) (via imap client: thunderbird, roundcude, etc..) How to reproduce: 1. Create some folder name, like TEST 2. Create sub-folder under TEST (like SUBTEST) Structure: TEST |--SUBTEST # doveadm mailbox list -u postmaster at testmailbox Spam Trash Sent Drafts INBOX TEST TEST/SUBTEST 3. Move (or copy)

Copying or moving with email client: thunderbird, roundcube (webmail), mutt or any other email client via imap protocol. 25.06.2019 22:10, Germ?n Herrera ?????: > Are you copying/moving the emails with {cp|mv} or with "doveadm {copy|move}"? > > On 2019-06-25 12:00, Aleksandr via dovecot wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have strange problem with "losing"

Hi again, Is it possible to call a method of the superclass within a method with the same name in the derived class? e.g. : call Test::list from SubTest::list (SubTest being a subclass of Test)? Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Yannick Majoros http://www.inma.ucl.ac.be/~majoros Informaticien UCL/INMA-MEMA 4, avenue G. Lema?tre B-1348

Hi folks, I am having trouble accessing sub-functions when the main function is stored in an array. For example, the following test code works fine: fcns = c(abs, sqrt) fcns[[1]](-2) fcns[[2]](2) However, when I try to access sub-functions declared within list() in a function, this only works directly. When I try to access these within an array only the first declared sub-function is run.

I just wanted to pass on some information regarding the behavior of memdisk that I was observing. I have been trying to set up pxelinux/memdisk on a network with a series of machines. I am trying to boot a 2.88MB DOS image. This image worked fine on all but one of our machines. The machine had a usb floppy device. Now the machine would boot the DOS image fine if the usb floppy device was

----- Original Message ----- > Thanks for the alternatives! > > I am trying the 'extracting sub-function' approach. However, it seems > I > can't get the 'subfunction' to pass the verifier. This is my > subfunction: > > define void @main_extern([8 x i8]* %arg_ptr) { > entrypoint: > %0 = getelementptr [8 x i8]* %arg_ptr, i32 0 > %1 =

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: >>>> Hi,

Thanks for the alternatives! I am trying the 'extracting sub-function' approach. However, it seems I can't get the 'subfunction' to pass the verifier. This is my subfunction: define void @main_extern([8 x i8]* %arg_ptr) { entrypoint: %0 = getelementptr [8 x i8]* %arg_ptr, i32 0 %1 = bitcast [8 x i8]* %0 to i64* %2 = load i64* %1 %3 = getelementptr [8 x i8]*

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here are two patches to fix an issue reported on kernel bugzilla (infinite loop >> due to unchecked function) and a more important fix to fix hanging Optimus >> machines when runtime PM

I have some trouble interpreting the output from profiling. I have read the help pages Rprof, summaryRprof and consult the R extensions manual, but I still have problems understanding the output. Basically the output consist of self.time and total.time. I have the understanding that total.time is the time spent in a given function including any subcalls or child functions or whatever the

Dear All I need to schedule for a repeated task on my CentOS server, as the followings: -) Telnet to a remote node -) Issue a command -) Capture the output in a log -) Logout from Telnet -) Wait for a prescribed time interval -) Then redo , but append the subsequent output in just on file Can you please let me know which options do we have to write such a task? Thank you -------------- next part

Dear all, I would like some help, please, with implementing Hal`s excellent suggestion, which I have reworded as below. Hal has confirmed a previous version of my rewording as a correct interpretation. [I made minor changes since then, e.g. for grammar.] [Abe wrote:] >> I think you [Hal] are suggesting something like this: >> 1) compile the program with FP fusion off,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthias Braun via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Abe Skolnik" <a.skolnik at samsung.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 6:20:09 PM > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] improving

Hi all, I'm hoping someone could tell me what best practices are as far as keeping programs organized in R. In most languages, I like to keep things organized by writing small functions. So, suppose I want to write a function that would require helper functions or would just be too big to write in one piece. Below are three ways to do this: ################### Style 1 (C-style)

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:10:23PM -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Peter Wu <peter at lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here are two patches to fix an issue reported on kernel bugzilla (infinite loop > > due to unchecked function) and a more important fix to fix hanging Optimus > > machines when runtime PM is enabled (with

One more question. I hope you're not getting tired of me already. Does generating LLVM code have to proceed in any particular order? Of course, if I am writing LLVM assembler by appending characters to the end of a sequential file, I'd have to write everything in the order prescribed by the assembler syntax. But if I'm using the C interface to build an LLVM parse tree, does that

I accidentally created a controller with the wrong name. Obviously I don''t want to have this useless controller hanging around - is there a prescribed way to delete the controller or can I just delete the controller file? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.