similar to: How to do ADF test and KPSS test in R

Dear All, I am trying to use kpss.test function so as to perform a stationarity test on a data sample. Is it possible to know the associated confidence level for this test? I have not seen any arguments related to it. I had a look at some other tests included in R (adf.test, pp.test, ks.test ...) and I could not find this information for them. Thanks in advanced. Kind regards, Belén

Hi all, Can anyone clear my doubts about what conclusions to take with the following what puts of some time series tests: > adf.test(melbmax) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: melbmax Dickey-Fuller = -5.4075, Lag order = 15, p-value = 0.01 alternative hypothesis: stationary Warning message: p-value smaller than printed p-value in: adf.test(melbmax)

Dear R users, I have a function (below) which encompasses several tests. However, when I run it, only the output of the last test is displayed. How can I ensure that the function root(var) will run and display the output from all tests, and not just the last one? Thank you, b. root <- function(var) { #---Phillips-Perron PP.test(var, lshort = TRUE) PP.test(var, lshort = FALSE)

Situation: I had tired a 1000-data generated by random error(i.i.d.), then I sub it into different unit root tests. I got different results among the tests. The following are the test statistics I got: adf.test @ tseries ~ -10.2214 (lag = 9) ur.df @ urca ~ -21.8978 ur.sp @ urca ~ -27.68 pp.test @ tseries ~ -972.3343 (truncation lag =7) ur.pp @ urca ~ -973.2409 ur.kpss @ urca ~ 0.1867 kpss.test @

Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.347 0.463

Hi R users! I've come across using kpss tests for time series analysis and i have a question that troubles me since i don't have much experience with time series and the mathematical part underlining it. x<-c(253, 252, 275, 275, 272, 254, 272, 252, 249, 300, 244, 258, 255, 285, 301, 278, 279, 304, 275, 276, 313, 292, 302, 322, 281, 298, 305, 295, 286, 327, 286, 270, 289, 293, 287,

Hello everybody, I've got a matrix called EUROPEDATA and I want to calculate the adf test statistic (part of the tseries package) on a rolling basis for window my.win on each column; i.e. each column of EUROPEDATA represents a particular variable; for the first column I calculate the adf test statistic for window my.win = 60 for example, roll forward one observation, calculate the adf

is that 'x' is level or trend stationary. I did this > s<-rnorm(1000) > kpss.test(s) KPSS Test for Level Stationarity data: s KPSS Level = 0.0429, Truncation lag parameter = 7, p-value = 0.1 Warning message: p-value greater than printed p-value in: kpss.test(s) My question is whether p=0.1 is a good number to reject N0? On the other hand, I have a

I'm trying to understand how to use kpss.test() properly. If I have a level stationary series like rnorm() in the help page, shouldn't I get a small p-value with the null hypothesis set to "Trend"? The (condensed) output from kpss.test() for the two possible null hypotheses is given below. I don't see any significant difference between these results. > x <-

Dear sir, I am a new user of R statistical package. I want to perform adf.test(augmented dickey fuller test), which packages I need to install in order to perform it. I am getting following message on my monitor. *x<-rnorm(1000) > adf.test(x) Error: could not find function "adf.test" *I am waiting for your response. Kamlesh Kumar. -- Kamlesh Kumar Appt. No. - QQ420,

Hi All, First of all, could you tell me what the "KPSS Level" in the output of the test means? I have a series, x, of periodic data and tried kpss.test() on it to verify its stationarity. The tests gave me the p-value above 0.1. Since the null hypothesis N0 is that the series _is_ stationary, this means that I cannot reject N0. But the series does look periodic! So does all this

Hello everyone! Quite a similar question has been posed here some time ago, but there was no explicit solution offered. So I hope that it is OK to pose it again. I want to perform a KPSS test using the packages "urca" or "tseries". But I neither want to use the predefined lag structures, "short" and "long", nor specify the number of lags arbitrarily by

Dear List, I have multiple time series, all of which (excepting 1) have missing values. These run for ~30 years, with monthly sampling. I need to determine stationarity, and have tried to use the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test (adf.test), but this cannot handle missing values. The same problem occurs when attempting cross-correlation (ccf). Could someone please suggest any suitable functions in

Dear R-list member, an update of package 'urca' has been uploaded to CRAN (Mirror: Austria). In the updated release unit root and cointegration tests encountered in applied econometric analysis are implemented. The package is written in 'pure' R and utilises S4 classes. In particular, the Johansen procedure with likelihood ratio tests for the inclusion of a linear trend,

Hello! I do not understand what is meant by: "aic" and "bic" follow a top-down strategy based on the Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria in the datails to the ADF.test function. What does a "top-down strategy" mean? Probably the respective criterion is minimized and the mode vector contains the lag orders at which the criterion attains it

Hi, I am quite new to R and would appreciate some guidance, if possible. I have imported a csv file: spread <- read.csv("Spread.csv") I get the following error when I try to run adf.test: > adf.test(spread,alternative = c("stationary", "explosive"),0) Error in embed(y, k) : 'x' is not a vector or matrix Why is this? -- View this message in context:

Hi all, I was running the adf test in R. CODE 1: adf.test(data$LOSS) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: data$LOSS Dickey-Fuller = -1.9864, Lag order = 2, p-value = 0.5775 alternative hypothesis: stationary CODE 2: adf.test(diff(diff(data$LOSS))) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: diff(diff(data$LOSS)) Dickey-Fuller = -6.9287, Lag order = 2, p-value = 0.01 alternative

Hi, While doing the ADF test in R using the following command I am getting the error and the result.."> x.ct=ur.df(rev$REVENUE,start=1,end=length(rev$REVENUE),frequency=1) Error in ur.df(rev$REVENUE, start = 1, end = length(rev$REVENUE), frequency = 1) : unused argument(s) (start = 1, end = 4, frequency = 1) >

Hi, I am trying to test whether a series is return series stationary, but before proceeding I wanted to make sure I understand correctly how to use the adf.test function and interpret its output... Could you please let me know whether I am correct in my interpretations? ex: I take x such as I know it doesn't have a unit root, and is therefore stationary 1/ > x <- rnorm(1000) >

Hello! I am applying the ADF.test function from package uroot to a time series of data. When I apply the full test, incorporating drift and trend terms, the regressor estimate of the drift term is not significantly different from zero. So I apply the test to a model without drift term, with deterministic trend only. But then I always get the following error: