similar to: Overriding inheritance_column

Hi, I''m building a frontend for a legacy schema, with tables like this: CREATE TABLE `types` ( `a_type_cd` varchar(6) NOT NULL default '''', `a_type` varchar(30) NOT NULL default '''', PRIMARY KEY (`a_type_cd`) ); The primary key is specified by the user (not auto-generated), and needs to be updateable. I create the following a base class to

I have been struggling for quite sometime with this. Is there any way to configure the Model to store user defined value in the inheritance_column instead of the default value (which is class_name) The problem I have is like this: I have a User model and there are different models which inherit from this like Admin, Premium, Professional, etc. Each of these inherited models are identified by a

I''m looking for the cleanest way to force the Rails framework to use a lower-case version of the table and column names in a database when creating records. I need this for a Rails application that displays the status of an existing backup system. The backup system (Bacula; Nice backup system, BTW) can use either Postgres or Mysql as its database engine. Unfortunately, the table and

Hi everybody! The class ActiveRecord::Base have a atribute named type and if my table have a column with the same name i get an error if i use model.finde, model.save and more... I dont know what i can do to solve this problem! Someone know? Thanks -- _________ Noel R. Morais

I started using robotcoop''s CachedModel class in my project but have encountered problems when using it with the acts_as_ferret plugin. It seems it doesn''t index everything in my STI model, also if I do a search from my base STI class I get a result count but no results. If I run the same search from one of the children STI models I get the appropriate results (if the information

All; I'm currently using Asterisk 1.8 and I want to be able to have each user be able to set as many of the voicemail options as possible. The documentation calls voicemail options that can be overridden on a per-mailbox basis "advanced options". However, I've read conflicting information as to which options in the section [general] can be overridden. According to

> > I thought I read that anything from dovecot.conf can be overridden in a > > userdb lookup. Or a passdb lookup with "userdb_" prefix. > > > > But I tried for fun change log_path but it never worked. Is that because > > logging is special, already started logging before it comes to the > > passdb/userdb lookups? So are there some dovecot.conf

Hi, I thought I read that anything from dovecot.conf can be overridden in a userdb lookup. Or a passdb lookup with "userdb_" prefix. But I tried for fun change log_path but it never worked. Is that because logging is special, already started logging before it comes to the passdb/userdb lookups? So are there some dovecot.conf settings that cannot be overridden? Thanks!

Anybody know how I can override delete/destroy in objects that have has_and_belongs_to_many behavior specified? I''m having issues overriding delete for an ActiveRecord object that contains a has_and_belongs_to_many relationship. Delete and destroy are properly overridden for objects that do not have has_and_belongs_to_many relationships specified, but as soon as I add any the overridden

Il 9 marzo 2015 alle 4.17 "E.B." <emailbuilder88 at yahoo.com> ha scritto: > I thought I read that anything from dovecot.conf can be overridden in a > userdb lookup. Or a passdb lookup with "userdb_" prefix. > > But I tried for fun change log_path but it never worked. Is that because > logging is special, already started logging before it comes to the

I have some strange behaviour on Windows XP boxes (the same code on Linux doesn''t have the same behaviour). Ruby 1.8.2 and Rails 0.14.2. I have a single inheritance table nodes with a base class Node (acts_as_tree) and some subclasses such as PageNode and FolderNode. If I render the tree in an iframe in a set of iframes it doesn''t work, if I render it stand alone it works

I''ve made a inheritance rework some weeks ago that would possible fix it since it only loads the inheritance support in the class that''ll use it. In STI case, it would load only if the class that descends directly from AR has been inherited and the column specified in the inheritance_column is available. People here told me to wait until next release so we can dig into this, but

Hello, I stumble upon this error when loading a subclass of the Transaction class. For full details, see the pastie: http://pastie.org/4053678 Error message: ActiveRecord::SubclassNotFound: The single-table inheritance mechanism failed to locate the subclass: ''Transactions::DummyDdnlTransaction''. This error is raised because the column ''type'' is reserved for

Hi, I''m trying to do something with Hiera, whereby the ''default'' configuration for a class is within it''s role/profile manifest, which can then be overridden on a node specific basis by hiera. As an example; class profile::base { class { ''::ntp'': servers => [''a'', ''b'', ''c'',

On 8/20/06, Paul Corcoran <prcorcoran-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I just encountered something that is not what I would expect. I > overrode an accessor method in my model class and within this method I > did a "super" call which failed. Of couse my real method would be doing > more but here is the basic code that

Hey, I have been looking at ActiveRecord''s serialization code, and noticed that ActiveRecord::XmlSerializer#serializable_attributes purposely excludes the STI inheritance column per ``options[:except] = Array(options[:except]) | Array(@record.class.inheritance_column).'''' Is there a particular reason for this? Would anyone be opposed to my writing a patch to have this

Hi Zed (and list), I first of all wanted to thank you for all the hard work you''ve done to make writing HTTP services in Ruby easier and more reliable. A friend of mine and I are developing a network filestore service (similar to S3) based on Mongrel, and we got a fairly useful set of functionality done and working in a matter of a few weeks thanks largely to your work. Mongrel

I''ve seen this topic has been discussed a couple of times. However, I''m wondering if a method exists in rails to test a name against the reserved words listed on the wiki? Just wanted to check before I write this myself (and type in all of those names -- including PostgreSQL). To explain the application: I''ve written a project that manages ldap data. On a fresh

hi, I found a bug in ActiveRecord association SQL INNER JOIN codes. in has_many, has_one, habtm and belongs_to queries the foreign key is determined from the table name of reflection and self. but that''s worng because if you use a global prefix or suffix for your tables the foreign keys will be in format of PREFIX_CLASSNAME_SUFFIX_id which is wrong, because it breaks the advantage of

Hi, I''m writing this app with inheritance. I''m using the type column to store the class name. Another app scans the app and performs actions. However, it is possible that the second app does not implement a class, in which case, the superclass should be instantiated. Now I''m getting: /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.2/lib/