similar to: How to get "last status change", ctime on Windows?

On 8 September 2015 at 13:57, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: Hi Kevin. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The ctime will always be newer or the same as the mtime. This is > because changing the mtime also changes the ctime as does other things > like changing the permissions. > > Rsync only pays attention to the mtime because rsync can

Hi, We use an rsync (rrsync, to be precise) based back-up solution. Every so often an iSCSI based file-system gets brought up and left connected for the night. After a mount event rsync will back that volume up, including server TB of data that haven't been modified, but the ctime is newer than the mtime. Is there a way to stop this behaviour? Cheers, Andrej

(R 2.8.0 on Debian GNU/Linux sid) ?file.info contains: mtime, ctime, atime: integer of class '"POSIXct"': file modification, creation and last access times. This implies that ctime is "file [...] creation [...] time" Has R implemented ctime differently to Unix? I understand, on Linux at least, that ctime is the last change time (not the creation time).

It looks like I need to elaborate further to get a feedback. I checked the rsync source code and it is using utime() to restore atime file attribute. It is fine to change ctime for that transferred file in this case. What we are having problem is that when rsync gets kicked off and transfers one file to the destination, this action changes ctime of "all" files in the same

Hello I am making backup of a Plesk Debian server to /backup using Rsync. My questioin is how can I preserve the ctime, mtime, and atime of original files? Thanks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13735 Bug ID: 13735 Summary: Synchronize files when the sending side has newer change times while modification times and sizes are identical on both sides Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW

I would like to learn AsciiDoc. Is there any good examples how to use AsciiDoc with R? I know that there is packages called ascii to do this, but it would be nice to see some examples how AsciiDoc works with R. Is there an AsciiDoc distribution for Max OS X? -Johannes

Greetings all- I am conducting security testing on a device that uses Linux 2.4 with ext3. I am testing secure overwrite of remnant data in temporary files, but have run into a real good stumpper in the way Ext allocates data blocks. I've got 10 yrs of *NIX behind me, several with Linux, and this has really got me perplexed as I can't find any documentation explaining the subject

My intention is to give a presentation about R programming language for software developers. I would like to ask, what are the things that make R different from other programming languages? What are the specific cases where Java/C#/Python developer might say "Wow, that was neat!"? What are the things that are easy in R, but very difficult in other programming languages (like Java)?

On 6/30/07, Wayne Davison <wayned@samba.org> committed: > Added Files: > checksum-xattr.diff > Log Message: > A simple patch that lets rsync use cached checksum values stored in > each file's extended attributes. A perl script is provided to create > and update the values. Wayne, You should be aware of two drawbacks of caching checksums in xattrs: First,

Hi, How to rbind these vectors from a list?: > l <- list(a = c(1, 2), b = c(1, 2, 3)) > l $a [1] 1 2 $b [1] 1 2 3 > do.call(rbind, l) [,1] [,2] [,3] a 1 2 1 b 1 2 3 Warning message: In function (..., deparse.level = 1) : number of columns of result is not a multiple of vector length (arg 1) > -J

I'm trying to clone a volume in a storage pool and I'm following the steps described here: http://libvirt.org/docs/libvirt-appdev-guide-python/en-US/html/libvirt_application_development_guide_using_python-Storage_Pools-Cloning.html My code looks like: destXML = """ <volume>

Carlos A. P. Cunha via samba wrote: > For me, is "magic line" > > find $DEST -depth -mtime +$DAYS -print -delete ---- I'm guessing you probably want 'ctime' there. If you use mtime, then it will be deleted "ndays" after the last modification date on the file -- NOT the time the file was moved into the recycle bin. If you use ctime - that

Hi there, i still have a weird problem with Powerpoint an Excel files stored on a Samba share. Only read on if you -use a samba share as MULTI-user file repository (no force_user etc.) -where multiple, different users share files in common directories -the modification time of a file is of any relevance to you. (seems like lots of folks don?t bother access rights or keep their information

struct timespec64 has unused bits in the tv_nsec field that can be used for other purposes. In future patches, we're going to change how the inode->i_ctime is accessed in certain inodes in order to make use of them. In order to do that safely though, we'll need to eradicate raw accesses of the inode->i_ctime field from the kernel. Add new accessor functions for the ctime that we can

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname

Problem: Want to be able to produce a qcow2 file with multiple ext4 File Systems. Days later want to reproduce the production of the qcow2 and have the exact same byte-for-byte file, to prove my build is reproducible. Currently the ctime attributes of the inodes will differ and thus the qcow2 files will differ. Since the file times are subsecond the trick of setting the system time and chmoding

Hi, I just want some clarification on how Dovecot's IMAP assigns UIDs when it picks files from the "new" directory of a Maildir. What I am observing is that only ctime has a role to play in it. For example if there are two files in "new", a.msg & z.msg. Even when a.msg has lower mtime than z.msg and "a" comes before "z" alphabetically, dovecot

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The ctime will always be newer or the same as the mtime. This is because changing the mtime also changes the ctime as does other things like changing the permissions. Rsync only pays attention to the mtime because rsync can set a specific mtime (--times) but setting a specific ctime is impossible as it would violate the basic *nix security model.