similar to: extract and replace columns of matrices stored in a list

Hi Guys, I am new to puppet so please let me know if this is not the correct place for asking this question. I am setting up a new puppet environment running the latest 3.x version. I have the puppet master and client setup correctly and tested with deploying a simple file to the client. Now, I am working on adding all the configs to SVN since I will have all my users checkout the

On Tuesday 26 October 2010 14:33:02 Duncan Sands wrote: > > transaction properties (eg, virtually atomic + isolated execution) for > > ordinary program code. Thus, to make incrementing a counter thread-safe, > > you could say __transaction { counter++; } and the compiler would > > transform this code so that it uses a TM library, which in turn does > > concurrency

Dear All, I´m using the following code: all1<-gg2[[1]][[1]]; for(i in 1:48){ all1 <- rbind(all1,gg2[[i]][[1]]) } to create a new matrix that contains all the matrices in a list called gg2. gg2 is a list that looks like >> gg2 [[1]] [[1]][[1]] <matrix one> [[2]] [[2]][[1]] <matrix two> . . . [[48]] [[48]][[1]] <matrix 48> Is there a faster way to do the rbind?

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 11.08.2015 um 21:47 schrieb Dr J Austin: >>> >>> What does cyrus-imapd log? >>> >>> Alexander >>> >>> >> >> Where should I be looking ? > > /var/log/maillog is the default log file for the MAIL facility. Else check > your syslog() daemon configuration. > >

Hi Torvald, On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:01, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Tuesday 26 October 2010 14:33:02 Duncan Sands wrote: >>> transaction properties (eg, virtually atomic + isolated execution) for >>> ordinary program code. Thus, to make incrementing a counter thread-safe, >>> you could say __transaction { counter++; } and the compiler would >>> transform this

Hey, I just updated from the edge and it looks like this _issue_ has resurfaced. Yesterday things were working (stories and specs). No code base changes, only rspec and rspec_on_rails After updating today I now need to set <config.txn...fixtures> to false in the spec_helper.rb to get the specs running, the stories are fine. Looks like the fixture loading is trying to start a txn. I

So there are a couple parts to this question. I am trying to implement the rpart/random forest algorithms on a transaction lists. That is to say i am trying to train models in order to deduce what are the most predictive transactions within a customers history in order apply this model to future test data and identify accounting irregularities(ie. this account had x and y so they should have also

dear All, i'm trying to calculate the number of Mondays, Tuesdays, etc that each month within a date range has. I have time series data that spans 60 months and i want to calculate the number of Mondays, Tuesdays, Wed, etc of each month. (I want to control for weekly seasonality but my data is monthly). Is there an easy way to to this in R? or is there a package i could use? i did

Hi - Below is my code and then the error when I run the last line. time_np <- train1_na$tte event_np <- train1_na$censored X_np <- cbind( train1_na$AMT, train1_na$DISCOUNT_AMT, train1_na$high_price_pcnt, train1_na$EM_RECEIVED, train1_na$DM_RECEIVED, train1_na$TXN_WITH_RINGCODE, train1_na$WEB, train1_na$clearance_pcnt, train1_na$bts_pcnt, train1_na$sales_pcnt,

Hi Torvald, > I would like to know whether the community is interested in getting support > for Transactional Memory (TM) merged in upstream LLVM. I guess not :( TM basically gives you > transaction properties (eg, virtually atomic + isolated execution) for > ordinary program code. Thus, to make incrementing a counter thread-safe, you > could say __transaction { counter++; } and

Hi, I would like to know whether the community is interested in getting support for Transactional Memory (TM) merged in upstream LLVM. TM basically gives you transaction properties (eg, virtually atomic + isolated execution) for ordinary program code. Thus, to make incrementing a counter thread-safe, you could say __transaction { counter++; } and the compiler would transform this code so

Hi all, I've got a new server up, but it's not staying up.... After a day or so, it segfaults with: [Mar 22 23:17:49] WARNING[12177]: res_odbc.c:1406 _ast_odbc_request_obj2: SetConnectAttr (Txn isolation) returned an error: HY000: [MySQL][ODBC 5.2(a) Driver]You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use

Hello, Last Friday I upgraded my GlusterFS 3.10.7 3-way replica (with arbitrer) cluster to 3.12.7 and this morning I got a warning that 9 files on one of my volumes are not synced. Ineeded checking that volume with a "volume heal info" shows that the third node (the arbitrer node) has 9 files to be healed but are not being healed automatically. All nodes were always online and there

caching_thread()s do all their work under read access to extent_commit_sem. They give up on this read access only when need_resched() tells them, or when they exit. As a result, somebody that wants a WRITE access to this sem, might wait for a long time. Especially this is problematic in cache_block_group(), which can be called on critical paths like find_free_extent() and in commit path via

Hello, I''m thinking about a setup that looks like this: - 2 headnodes with FC connectivity (OpenSolaris) - 2 backend FC srtorages (Disk Shelves with RAID Controllers presenting a huge 15 TB RAID5) - 2 datacenters (distance 1 km with dark fibre) - one headnode and one storage in each data center (Sorry for this ascii art :) ( Data Center 1) <--1km--> (Data

Thanks David. Could you show me how to do that in my example ? Thanks, Meghna > On Nov 6, 2017, at 12:58 AM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > You should stop trying to use matrices on the RHS and using separate vectors to Surv. Instead use a data argument and have the names in your formula refer to column names. > > ? > David > > Sent

Hello, I have two matrices. They both have different row names and column names, but they have some common row names and column names. The row names and column names that are the same are what I am interested in. I also want the columns in the two matrices aligned the same. In the end, I need to do rd[1,1] and ua[1,1], for example and be accessing the same column and row for both matrices. Thank

You should stop trying to use matrices on the RHS and using separate vectors to Surv. Instead use a data argument and have the names in your formula refer to column names. ? David Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 5, 2017, at 7:21 PM, Meghna Govil via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > > > Hi - Below is my code and then the error when I run the last line. > >

I just joined and though I did quickly read the posting guide it is quite possible not going to be a perfect posting. For one I tried to figure out how to reply to an existing message on the topic. I gave up but figured I keep at least the same subject. In a gist I get an empty data frame after issuing the following select query from R 2.9.1 to Oracle 10.2.0.1 64bit via RODBC 1.3 and Oracle 11g

Here would be also the corresponding log entries on a gluster node brick log file: [2018-04-09 06:58:47.363536] W [MSGID: 113093] [posix-gfid-path.c:84:posix_remove_gfid2path_xattr] 0-myvol-private-posix: removing gfid2path xattr failed on /data/myvol-private/brick/.glusterfs/12/67/126759f6-8364-453c-9a9c-d9ed39198b7a: key = trusted.gfid2path.2529bb66b56be110 [No data available] [2018-04-09