similar to: Rank of matrix

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Rank of matrix"

2018 Jan 22
3
Inconsistent rank in qr()
Le 22/01/2018 ? 17:40, Keith O'Hara a ?crit?: > This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? > > rank - the rank of x as computed by the decomposition(*): always full rank in the LAPACK case. For a me a "full rank matrix" is a matrix the rank of which is indeed min(nrow(A), ncol(A)) but here the meaning of "always is full rank" is somewhat confusing. Does it
2018 Jan 23
1
Inconsistent rank in qr()
Le 23/01/2018 ? 08:47, Martin Maechler a ?crit?: >>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>>> on Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:57:47 +0100 writes: > > Le 22/01/2018 ? 17:40, Keith O'Hara a ?crit?: > >> This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? > >> > >> rank - the rank of x as
2011 Mar 31
1
rank of Matrix
Dear list, Can anyone tell me how to obtain the rank of a sparse Matrix, for example from package Matrix (class dgCMatrix)? Here is an example of QR decomposition of a sparse matrix (from the sparseQR class help). library(Matrix) data(KNex) mm <- KNex$mm str(mmQR <- qr(mm)) Similarly, using the functions/classes from the relatively new MatrixModels package: library(MatrixModels)
2017 Jun 22
1
Unexpected behaviour of base::qr()$rank
2017-06-22 20:31 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: > > > On 22.06.2017 20:09, I?aki ?car wrote: >> >> 2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: >>> >>> On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I
2013 Oct 17
1
pamer.fnc y la nueva versión de R
Hola buenas noches, tengo un problema bastante gordo. ¿A alguno le ha dejado de funcionar las funciones pamer.fnc y mcp.fnc con la nueva versión de R? La semana pasada formatee el ordenador y ahora scripts antiguos no funcionan. La cuestión es que me precupa que no funcione el ejemplo de tutorial del autor. Os dejo un script que debería de funcionar y no lo hace
2017 Nov 20
2
package check fail on Windows-release only?
I mistakenly left a write in "/tmp" in the rockchalk package (version 1.8.109) that I uploaded last Friday. Kurt H wrote and asked me to fix today. While uploading a new one, I became aware of a problem I had not seen. The version I uploaded last Friday, 1.8.109, has OK status on all platforms except r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64. I get OK on oldrel-windows and also on devel-windows.
2018 Jan 23
0
Inconsistent rank in qr()
>>>>> Serguei Sokol <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >>>>> on Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:57:47 +0100 writes: > Le 22/01/2018 ? 17:40, Keith O'Hara a ?crit?: >> This behavior is noted in the qr documentation, no? >> >> rank - the rank of x as computed by the decomposition(*): always full rank in the LAPACK case. > For a
2018 Jan 22
2
Inconsistent rank in qr()
Hi, I have noticed different rank values calculated by qr() depending on LAPACK parameter. When it is FALSE (default) a true rank is estimated and returned. Unfortunately, when LAPACK is set to TRUE, the min(nrow(A), ncol(A)) is returned which is only occasionally a true rank. Would not it be more consistent to replace the rank in the latter case by something based on the following pseudo code ?
2017 Jun 22
2
Unexpected behaviour of base::qr()$rank
2017-06-22 19:49 GMT+02:00 Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>: > On 22.06.2017 17:11, Bernd Funovits wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I experienced some unexpected behaviour while determining the rank of matrices (sometimes 1x1 matrices): >> base::qr(matrix(1e-20))$rank returns 1 (incorrect) >> base::qr(diag(c(1, 1e-20)))$rank returns 2
2017 Jun 22
2
Unexpected behaviour of base::qr()$rank
Hello, I experienced some unexpected behaviour while determining the rank of matrices (sometimes 1x1 matrices): base::qr(matrix(1e-20))$rank returns 1 (incorrect) base::qr(diag(c(1, 1e-20)))$rank returns 2 (incorrect) Best regards, Bernd > R.version _ platform x86_64-w64-mingw32 arch x86_64 os mingw32 system x86_64, mingw32 status major
2011 Aug 16
2
generalized inverse using matinv (Design)
i am trying to use matinv from the Design package to compute the generalized inverse of the normal equations of a 3x3 design via the sweep operator. That is, for the linear model y = ? + x1 + x2 + x1*x2 where x1, x2 are 3-level factors and dummy coding is being used the matrix to be inverted is X'X = 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
2010 Jul 06
1
Error message using mi() in mi package
Hello! I get the following message when I run the mi() function from the mi package. Error while imputing variable: c3 , model: mi.polr Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : could not find function "c14ordered" Here's the situation: I am running R v. 2.9.2 on Mac OSX v. 10.5.8. I am trying to impute missing data in a data set that I've trimmed down to 302 variables.
1998 Feb 24
3
R-beta: qr(A)$rank
I would like to find the rank of a matrix using R. Looking through a list of commands it seems that the command qr should do the job. Checking a simple example gave me the wrong answer. Here is the example: > A <- c(1,2,3,4,5,6) > A <- matrix(A, nrow=2, ncol=3) > A [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 1 3 5 [2,] 2 4 6 > qr(A)$rank [1] 3 The correct answer is two. I
1998 Feb 24
3
R-beta: qr(A)$rank
I would like to find the rank of a matrix using R. Looking through a list of commands it seems that the command qr should do the job. Checking a simple example gave me the wrong answer. Here is the example: > A <- c(1,2,3,4,5,6) > A <- matrix(A, nrow=2, ncol=3) > A [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 1 3 5 [2,] 2 4 6 > qr(A)$rank [1] 3 The correct answer is two. I
2003 Nov 22
3
summary.manova and rank deficiency
Hi all, I have received the following error from summary.manova: Error in summary.manova(manova.test, test = "Pillai") : residuals have rank 36 < 64 The data is simulated data for 64 variables. The design is a 2*2 factorial with 10 replicates per treatment. Looking at the code for summary.manova, the error involves a problem with qr(). Does anyone have a suggestion as to how to
2009 Mar 13
1
lsfit w/ rank-deficient x
Dear R-devel, It seems that lsfit incorrectly reports coefficients when the input matrix 'x' is rank-deficient, see the example below: ## here values of 'b' and 'c' are incorrectly swapped > x <- cbind(a=rnorm(100), b=0, c=rnorm(100)); y <- rnorm(100); lsfit(x, y)$coef Intercept a b c -0.0227787 0.1042860 -0.1729261 0.0000000 Warning
2004 Jul 01
1
QR decomposition and rank of a matrix
In summary.manova the qr decomposition of a NxN matrix is calculated and for some cases is giving me a rank < N. However, following suggestions of professor Ripley to calculate the rank of a Matrix On 7 Jun 2002, Brian Ripley wrote: > For a more reliable answer, look at the SVD > (function svd) and look at the > singular values. For example (from lda.default) X.s <-
2007 Apr 06
4
Computing the rank of a matrix.
Hi! Maybe this is a silly question, but I need the column rank (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_matrix) of a matrix and R function 'rank()' only gives me the ordering of the elements of my matrix. How can I compute the column rank of a matrix? Is there not an R equivalent to Matlab's 'rank()'? I've been browsing for a time now and I can't find anything, so any
2005 May 04
4
rank of a matrix
how do I check the rank of a matrix ? say A= 1 0 0 0 1 0 then rank(A)=2 what is this function? thanks I did try help.search("rank"), but all the returned help information seem irrelevant to what I want. I would like to know how people search for help information like this. rank(base) Sample Ranks SignRank(stats) Distribution of the
2010 Jul 14
5
Matrix Size
hi - i just started using R as i am trying to figure out how perform a linear regression on a huge matrix. i am sure this topic has passed through the email list before but could not find anything in the archives. i have a matrix that is 2,000,000 x 170,000 the values right now are arbitray. i try to allocate this on a x86_64 machine with 16G of ram and i get the following: > x <-