similar to: Performance degradation on multi-processor system

A new package 'nnls' is now available on CRAN. The package provides an R interface to the Lawson-Hanson NNLS algorithm for non-negative least squares that solves the least squares problem A x = b with the constraint x >= 0. The Lawson-Hanson NNLS algorithm was published in Lawson CL, Hanson RJ (1974). Solving Least Squares Problems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Lawson CL,

A new package 'nnls' is now available on CRAN. The package provides an R interface to the Lawson-Hanson NNLS algorithm for non-negative least squares that solves the least squares problem A x = b with the constraint x >= 0. The Lawson-Hanson NNLS algorithm was published in Lawson CL, Hanson RJ (1974). Solving Least Squares Problems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Lawson CL,

Hello R experts, I have two questions related to the nnls library (http://www.inside-r.org/packages/cran/nnls), and more broadly to linear regression with positive coefficients. Sample code is below the Qs. Q1: Regular regression (with lm) gives me the significance of each variable. How do I get variable significance with nnls? If there's no ready function, any easy way to manually derive

A new package 'bvls' is available on CRAN. The package provides an R interface to the Stark-Parker algorithm for bounded-variable least squares (BVLS) that solves A x = b with the constraint l <= x <= u under least squares criteria, where l,x,u \in R^n, b \in R^m and A is an m \times n matrix. The Stark-Parker BVLS algorithm was published in Stark PB, Parker RL (1995).

A new package 'bvls' is available on CRAN. The package provides an R interface to the Stark-Parker algorithm for bounded-variable least squares (BVLS) that solves A x = b with the constraint l <= x <= u under least squares criteria, where l,x,u \in R^n, b \in R^m and A is an m \times n matrix. The Stark-Parker BVLS algorithm was published in Stark PB, Parker RL (1995).

Thank you Brian Ripley, Gardar Johannesson, and Marcel Wolbers for your prompt and friendly help! I will share any further learnings as I move through these suggestions. -Bob Abugov Brian Ripley wrote: I just use optim() on the sum of squares with non-negativity constraints. That did not exist in 1999. Gardar Johannesson wrote: You can always just use the quadratic programing library in R

Hi all, I am trying to do an inversion of electromagnetic data with non-negative least squares method (Tikhonov regularisation) and have got it programmed in S-Plus. However I am trying to move all my scripts from S-Plus to R. Is there an equivalent to nnls.fit in R? I think this can be done with pcls? Right? S-Plus script: A, L and data are matrices, lambda is a vector of possible lambda

Hi, recently I saw but did not pay too much attention to a question that concerned regression with positive coefficients. In Splus, thereis the nnls() function that can be used if I am not wrong, but what about R ? Now I have the same problem: doing a logistic regression under constraint that coefs are non negative. What can I do with R? is there a (weighted) nnls() counterpart available? Thanks

Dear R users, I am currently attempting to fit logistic regression models in R, where the slopes should be restricted to positive values. Although I am aware of the package nnls (which does the trick for linear regression models), I did not find any solution for logistic regression. If there is any package available for this purpose, I would be interested to know them. Alternatively, I realize

Dear All, Which package/function could i use to solve following linear least square problem? A over determined system of linear equations is given. The nnls-function may would be a possibility BUT: The solving is constrained with a inequality that all unknowns are >= 0 and a equality that the sum of all unknowns is 1 The influence of the equations according to the solving process is

I have come to realize that I don't have to have a g729a license in order to make use of an ATA-186 or 7460 connecting to another 7460. I just need to allow the codec in sip.conf. Now what ramification does that have when I dial out over one of my analog line (connected to * by a channelbank and a T100P) using my 7460 or ATA-186. The only benefit I am looking for is reduced bandwidth

Dear R users, I am currently attempting to fit logistic regression models in R, where the slopes should be restricted to positive values. Although I am aware of the package nnls (which does the trick for linear regression models), I did not find any solution for logistic regression. If there is any package available for this purpose, I would be interested to know them. Alternatively, I realize

I'm hoping that someone with deeper insight into S4 than I, that is to say virtually everyone reading this list, could help resolve the following problem in SparseM. We have setGeneric("backsolve", function(r, x, k = NULL, upper.tri = NULL, transpose = NULL, twice = TRUE, ...) standardGeneric("backsolve"), useAsDefault= function(r, x,

Readers, Using version 251 I tried the following command: lm(y~a+b,data=datafile) Resulting in, inter alia: ... coefficients (intercept) a 1.2 3.4 Packages installed: acepack ace() and avas() for selecting regression transformations adlift An adaptive lifting scheme algorithm akima Interpolation of irregularly spaced

first, apologies for so many posts yesterday and today. I am wrestling with nls() and nls2(). I have tried to whittle it down to a simple example that still has my problem, yet can be cut-and-pasted into R. here it is: library(nls2) options(digits=12); y= c(0.4334,0.3200,0.5848,0.6214,0.3890,0.5233,0.4753,0.2104,0.3240,0.2827,0.3847,0.5571,0.5432,0.1326,0.3481) x=

Dear list, I have a degradation model: dX/dt = * I(X2)*( k1*X(t) )/( X(t)+k2 ) where X(t) is concentration at time t, and k1 and k2 are parameters that I want to estimate. I(X) is a known inhibitor function. My questions is whether this is implemented or easily computed in any R package. I have searched the archives but without luck. Any help or comments on this would be appreciated, Klaus

Hi I see severe network performance degradation with the kernels 4.12-rc1 and 4.12-rc2 in the network virtio driver. Download rate drops down to about 100kB/s. I bisected it and it is caused by patch d85b758f72b05a774045545f24d70980e3e9aac4 ("virtio_net: fix support for small rings"). When I revert this patch, the problem goes away. The host is Debian Jessie with kernel 4.4.62,

Hi I see severe network performance degradation with the kernels 4.12-rc1 and 4.12-rc2 in the network virtio driver. Download rate drops down to about 100kB/s. I bisected it and it is caused by patch d85b758f72b05a774045545f24d70980e3e9aac4 ("virtio_net: fix support for small rings"). When I revert this patch, the problem goes away. The host is Debian Jessie with kernel 4.4.62,

Thanks for the reply, Adam. If this is the case, it would seem to me (because the degradation happens only after a period of time, and quite suddenly) that the issue lies with digium's implementation of g729. As an interesting note, I had the same problems using ulaw -> ulaw over the local network (from internal phone to internal phone) with a much shorter period of 'good

Did somebody got to put 1.000 printing queues in a Linux+Samba+Cups production server without degradation? Thanks for any reply, Bruno Gomes Pessanha