similar to: Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares of nonlinear regression

Hi there, I'm trying to fit a growth curve to some data and need to use a weighted least squares estimator to account for heteroscedasticity in the data. A weights argument is available in nls that would appear to be appropriate for this purpose, but it is listed as 'not yet implemented'. Is there another package which could implement this procedure? Regards, Robert Brown

Hi: I have data from an assay in the form of two vectors, one is response and the other is a predictor. When I attempt to fit a 5 parameter logistic model with "nls", I get converged parameter estimates. I also get the same answers with "gnls" without specifying the "weights" argument. However, when I attempt to use the "gnls" function and try to

We have a choice when calculating the Huber location estimate: > set.seed(221205) > y <- 7 + 3*rt(30,1) > library(MASS) > huber(y)$mu [1] 5.9117 > coefficients(rlm(y~1)) (Intercept) 5.9204 I was surprised to get two different results. The function huber() works directly with the definition whereas rlm() uses iteratively reweighted least squares. My surprise is

Dear R users, I use the glm() function to fit a generalized linear model with gamma distribution function and log link. I have read in the help page that the default method used by R is "glm.fit" (iteratively reweighted least squares, IWLS). Is it possible to use maximum likelihood method? Thanks Silvia Narduzzi Dipartimento di Epidemiologia ASL RM E Via di S. Costanza, 53 00198

As John noted, there are different kinds of weights, and different terminology: * inverse-variance weights (accuracy weights) * case weights (frequencies, counts) * sampling weights (selection probability weights) I'll add: * inverse-variance weights, where var(y for observation) = 1/weight (as opposed to just being inversely proportional to the weight) * weights used as part of an

I'm trying to fit a model to solve a biological problem. There are multiple independent variables, and also there are multiple responses. Each response is a function of all the independent variables, plus a set of parameters. All the responses depend on the same variables and parameters - just the form of the function changes to define each seperate response. Any ideas how I can fit

Greetings, My question is more algorithmic than prectical. What I am trying to determine is, are the GAM algorithms used in the mgcv package affected by nonnormally-distributed residuals? As I understand the theory of linear models the Gauss-Markov theorem guarantees that least-squares regression is optimal over all unbiased estimators iff the data meet the conditions linearity,

Hi all, I'm trying to fit a nonlinear (logistic-like) regression, and I'd like to get some recommendations for which package to use. The expression I want to fit is something like: y ~ A * exp(X * Beta1) / (1 + exp(-(x + X * Beta2 - xmid)/scal)) Basically, it's a logistic function, but I want to be able to modify the saturation amplitude by a few parameters (Beta1) and shift the

Full_Name: Stephen Weigand Version: 1.9.0 OS: Mac OS X 10.3.4 Submission from: (NULL) (68.115.89.235) When running an iteratively reweighted least squares program R crashes and the following is written to the console.app (when using R GUI) or to stdout (when using R from the command line): Parameter 5 to routine DSTEIN was incorrect Mac OS BLAS parameter error in DSTEIN, parameter #0,

Hello to all, I'm a biologist trying to tackle a "fish" (Poisson Regression) which is just too big for my modest understanding of stats!!! Here goes... I want to find good literature or proper mathematical procedure to calculate a confidence interval for an inverse prediction of a Poisson regression using R. I'm currently trying to analyse a "dose-response"

Dear Madam/Sir This may be quite a long shot... By way of intro, I am a masters student in actuarial science at the University of Cape Town, and I am doing a project in R on some healthcare cost data. During my coding in R I encountered an error message, which I then googled, but I am still unable to resolve the issue. I would like to please ask if and how it is possible to resolve the problem

Hi all and thanks for your time in advance, I can't figure out why summary.lmrob complains when lmrob is used on a zooreg object. If the zooreg object is converted to vector before calling lmrob, no problems appear. Let me clarify this with an example: >library(robustbase) >library(zoo) >dad<-c(801.4625,527.2062,545.2250,608.2313,633.8875,575.9500,797.0500,706.4188,

Hi guys I have data that contains the variances vt of the yields of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,10, 20 year bonds. Assuming the Hull-White model for the yield of a t-year zero-coupon bond, I have to estimate the ? of the Hull-White model using nonlinear least squares and give a 95% con?dence interval for each parameter. Please can you guys tell how to find out ? using R. Any suggestion regarding what functions

Hi, I am new to R, and am trying to solve the following optimization problem: This is a nonlinear least squares problem. I have a set of 3D voxels. All I need is to find a least squares fit to this data. The data model actually represent a cube-like structure, consisting of seven straight lines. The lines have some intersections (and at this intersection both of the participating lines end).

Hello, I am trying to optimise a nonlinear model to derive 'best-fit' parameter esimates using the genoud function. I have been using the genetic algorithm - gafit - in order to do this, but I am getting parameter estimates that do not always reach the global minimum. I am very keen to apply genoud to optimising this model to see if my results will improve, and also out of personal

Hello, I'd like to fit a user defined function to a data set, but I have problems to find my problem. The user defined function is a combination of two rectangular functions, and the listing below gives an example for what I want to do. The problem is, that I get the error message for fit1 and fit2 "Error in nlsModel(formula, mf, start, wts) : singular gradient matrix at initial

Dear all, I encounter some discrepancies when comparing the deviance of a weighted and unweigthed model with the AIC values. A general example (from 'nls'): DNase1 <- subset(DNase, Run == 1) fm1DNase1 <- nls(density ~ SSlogis(log(conc), Asym, xmid, scal), DNase1) This is the unweighted fit, in the code of 'nls' one can see that 'nls' generates a vector

Following on my posting of this morning, concerning a problem that I am having constructing a self-starting function for use with nls (and eventually with nlsList and nlme), the following is the self-starting function called NRhyperbola: > NRhyperbola function (Irr,theta,Am,alpha,Rd) { # Am is the maximum gross photosynthetic rate # Rd is the dark resiration rate (positive value) #

I have used Mike Powell's optimization routine (VA05AD) from the Harwell Subroutine Library (HSL) for more than 20 years. It is no exaggeration to say that it has helped make my career (thanks Mike). I recently learned that I am not alone in this respect - apparently it still has a loyal following in all sorts of fields! It is an exceedingly fine piece of software - fast, reliable and easy to

Hello. I am having a problem setting up a self-starting function for use in nonlinear regression (and eventually in the mixed model version). The function is a non-rectangular hyperbola - called "NRhyperbola" - which is used for fitting leaf photosynthetic rate to light intensity. It has one independent variable (Irr) and four parameters (theta, Am, alpha and Rd). I have created this