similar to: Multiple of independet Anova without loop?

I'm wondering if anyone would be able to help me out. I'm trying to use a type II ANOVA for a model with user-specified contrasts and covariates. I have two treatment groups and a control group. I'm comparing average treatment to controls and also between the two treatment groups, but I'm also looking to adjust for age and gender as covariates:

the study design of the data I have to analyse is simple. There is 1 control group (CTRL) and 2 different treatment groups (TREAT_1 and TREAT_2). The data also includes 2 covariates COV1 and COV2. I have been asked to check if there is a linear or quadratic treatment effect in the data. I created a dummy data set to explain my situation: df1 <- data.frame( Observation =

Full_Name: Andrew Manners Version: 2.5.1 OS: windows xp prof 2003 Submission from: (NULL) (130.102.0.177) To whom it may concern, I'm trying to get an ANOVA table within survreg but it always produces NA's in the p-value, regardless of the data set. The data set below comes from Tableman and Kim 2004. I had the same problem on a number of my own data sets. I searched the R site for

Hi All, I'm using glm() in R to perform Poisson regression, I'm wondering if its possible to get equivalent Type 1 / Type 3 Analysis (similar to one in PROC GENMOD). Thanks, Kim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

hi all - i'm having trouble using lme to specify a mixed effects model. i'm pretty sure this is quite easy for the experienced anova-er, which i unfortunately am not. i have a data frame with the following columns: col 1 : "Score1" (this is a continuous numeric measure between 0 and 1) col 2 : "Score2" (another continuous numeric measure, this time bounded between 0

Dear r helpers, I would like to look at the interaction between two two-level factors, one between and one within participants, after accounting for any variance due to practice (31 trials in each of two blocks) in the task. It seems to require treating practice as a covariate. All the examples I noticed for handling covariates (i.e. ANCOVA, including the ones in Faraway's "Practical

Hi, sorry if this is explained somewhere but I didn't find anything. How can I use "Anova" from the car package to test a modell without between subject's factors? Suppose I have the following data mat.1 mat.2 mat.3 di ex 1 85 85 88 1 1 2 90 92 93 1 1 3 97 97 94 1 1 4 80 82 83 1 1 5 91 92 91 1 1 6 83 83

Dear list, I would like to run an ANCOVA using car::Anova with repeated measures factors, but I can't figure out how to do it. My (between-subjects) covariate always interacts with my within-subject factors. As far as I understand ANCOVA, covariates usually do not interact with the effects of interest but are simply additive (or am I wrong here?). More specifically, I can add a covariate as

Hello, I believe the aov() function in R uses a "Type-I sum-of-squares" by default as against "Type-III". This is relevant for me because I am trying to understand ANOVA in R using my knowledge of ANOVA in SPSS. I can only reproduce the results of an ANOVA done using R through SPSS if I specify that SPSS uses a Type-I sum-of-squares. (And yes, I know that when the sample

Dear R community, I compare mean monthly body temperature between two age classes of turtles overwintering underground. lm(body_tem ~ Month*Year*Age_Class) TukeyHSD(aov(body_tem ~ Month*Year*Age_Class, a)) The Tukey HSD as well as the planned contrasts method showed significant differences between the two age classes, but insignificant differences between the two age classes at the same

Hello. When one types "summary(fit)", where fit is an object from a call to aov(), one gets an ANOVA table. I want to save just one element of this summary. How does one extract this? As an example, here is my output from a split plot ANOVA: > summary(out)$"Error: soil.cores$block:soil.cores$treatment" Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)

Hi, i`ve got a strange problem with appear or opacity. I`m appering a div which works fine, but when i do this the font in another independent div is changing. It looks more thinly as before the effect. I`ve tried this with Version 1.0 and 1.1 Any Ideas ? Thanks, odo odo@nightworkers.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type:

Hi, I have a problem in which I have test score data on students from a number of schools. In each school I have a measure of whether or not they received special programming. I am interested in the interaction between school and attendance to the programming, but in a very select set of comparisons. I'd like to cast the test as one in which students in each school who attend are

Dear list, I have a question regarding the meaning of intercept term in a two-way anova model without interaction term. for example (let's assume there is no interaction between factor1 and factor2) : > df         val        factor1 factor2 1  48.61533       A      t1 2 171.13535       B      t1 3  65.96884       C      t1 4  63.71222       A      t2 5  80.22049       B      t2 6 

Hi, I have been using R to do multiple analyses of variance with two covariates, but recently found that the results in SPSS were very different. I have check several books and web resources and I think that both methods are correct, but I am less familiar with R, so I was hoping someone could offer some suggestions. Oddly simple ANOVA is the same in SPSS and R. Including covariates improves the

Hello all: I am confused about the output from a lm() model with an incomplete design/missing level. I have two categorical predictors and a continuous covariate (day) that I am using to model larval mass (l.mass): leaf.species has three levels - map, syc, and oak cond.time has two levels - 30 and 150. There are no response values for Map-150, so that entire, two-way, level is missing.

Hey! Could you please take a quick look at what I have done? Somehow I get wrong results using the anova(lm()) combination compared to doing a two way ANOVA by hand. Running: Data<-read.table("Data.txt"); g<-lm(ExM~S1*S2,Data); anova(g); Gives: Analysis of Variance Table Response: ExM Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) S1 1 4.3679

There are anova {stats} and aov in R. It seems that anova takes an object returned by a model fitting function. But I don't see any examples for anova. Can somebody give me a simple example on anova? What is the difference between anova and aov?

Dear All -- I am trying to use within a little table producing code an anova comparison of two gls fitted objects, contained in a list of such object, obtained using nlme function gls. The anova procedure fails to locate the second of the objects. The following code, borrowed from the help page of anova.gls, exemplifies: --------------- start example code --------------- library(nlme) ##

Hi, For some reason do.call on anova fails if the models are named lmer objects. Consider the following example: library(lme4) models <- list( lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (1| Subject), sleepstudy), lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (Days | Subject), sleepstudy)) # # models is an unnamed list, do.call works (although with warning): do.call(anova, models) # # after labeling the models, do.call gives an