similar to: bug? saving (valid) updated object results in validation error

First of all, thanks for you time. I have kind of a tricky question and wanted to see what you guys thought. ------------------------------------------- Lets say I have this: ------------------------------------------- class Purchase < ActiveRecord::Base validates_numericality_of :some_number, :only_integer => true end ------------------------------------------- Then I do this:

I''m using Rails 2.0.2 and I have been trying to take advantage of the "validates_numericality_of" with the ":greater_than" option with something like this: validates_numericality_of :users, :greater_than => 0, :only_integer => true, :allow_nil => true, :message => "The number of allowed users must be a whole number greater than zero." But this

Hello everyone! I have 3 models: === 1 === class Region < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :districts end === 2 === class District < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :region has_many :suburbs end === 3 === class Suburb < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :district validates_numericality_of :region_id, :only_integer => true end In edit.rhtml for SuburbController I need to specify

Hello all, I have an Order object that has and belongs to many Products and has and belongs to many Loan Types. This is so I can select multiples of each in my order entry screen via checkbox groups. I''m having some trouble with saving multiple HABTM associations for a single model object; only the first HABTM association declared in the model will save during the initial @order.save

This is probably something very simple but I can''t seem to figure out why I keep getting the ''wrong number of arguments (1 for 2)'' error with the following code when I try to create a new record. If anyone can see what is going wrong here please help! new.rhtml ------------------------------------------------- ... <%= start_form_tag :action =>

All, I have a field that I''m validating with validates_numericality_of on as well as validates_inclusion_of, like so: validates_numericality_of :number_of_owners, :only_integer => true, :message => ''must be a whole number'' validates_inclusion_of :number_of_owners, :in => 1..3,

In console, I am trying to create a User but the :account_id does not come in. Console just gives me back :account_id => nil. Obviously I''m trying to set it though. Silly console... But, I can set the account_id column in my controller like so: @user = User.new(params[:user]) @user.account_id = account.id @user.save Here''s what I give to the controller: User.create :name

Hi, all! I would love if someone could help me figure this out. I can''t seem to see why the following fails: Here''s the spec: it "should redirect back to the index page" do Coupon.should_receive (:new).with({"name"=>@expectedName,"amount"=>@expectedAmount}).and_return(@coupon) @coupon.should_receive(:save) response.should

Hello World! I'm working on my thesis right now (something about financial immunization) I'm currently working in the basics, doing a matrix that lists the present value (or weight) of every combination of coupon rate and term to maturity, this is the code I have right now which is giving me a "longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length" #start

Dear Friends, i have a question for you, i am sure someone can help. The pfsense captive portal is up and running. Time countdown vouchers are working without issue, such as 30m, 45m, 1h & so on. However, I'd like to set up a download quota of 200MB per voucher. but then you need to login with a username and password, instead of vouchers. but I haven't found a way to generate

I have data in the following form: ID COUPON0 COUPON1 COUPON2 COUPON3 1 1 1000 1001 1002 2 2 NA NA NA 3 1000 1003 NA 1004 4 1001 NA 1005 NA 5 1002 NA NA NA 12 1003 NA NA 1006 7 1005 NA NA NA 8 1004 1007 NA NA 9 1006 NA NA NA 26

Dear R forum, Following is an customized extract of a code I am working on. settlement = as.Date("2013-11-25") maturity   = as.Date("2015-10-01") coupon     = 0.066 yield      = 0.1040 basis      = 1   frequency = 2 redemption = 100 # __________________________________________________________________ add.months = function(date, n)  {   nC <- seq(date, by=paste (n,

My users dial *120 get to an IVR menu that plays their balance and then ask them for a voucher. Ater the balance is played and the request for the voucher is played the user don't hear any other audio from the asterisk box. I can see the asterisk server playing the files to ask for the voucher again but the user cannot hear any thing. Has any one seens this issue with IVRs. I notice a

Hi. I am developing an industry specific crm that allows busineses to track customers in a particular way. Each customer will be assigned a customer number. The first customer will have a customer number of 1, the second customer_number = 2, etc... Note that this customer number is not global but particular to the account that created the customer (see schema snip below). I need to have a

Hi list, I''ve got some counter_caches in a model. When these get incremented - say on a page view - my updated_on column also gets updated. How can I conditionally not update updated_on if just these counter_cache columns change? The problem with that is that I am using acts_as_versioned which clones the record each time updated_on changes. I am successfully ignoring the counter_cache

Hi, there. I have two validations in the model: validates_numericality_of :value, :only_integer=>true, :allow_blank=>true validates_size_of :value, :is=>9, :message=>"must be 5-digit number", :if=>Proc.new{|u| u.value.is_a?(Numeric)} They work as expected except when the :value is character/string like "a" "abc", the second validation will also output

Dear Experts i am sure many of you would be the part of the real game, where lot of technology is implemented (Internet Service Providers) those serve thousands of clients everyday . i am requesting opinion & advice from those experts. Surfing web does not help much unless someone who is practically touch and making the use of the technology everyday. And i could not find the best place than

Hi I have the models 1.ServiceDeskTicket with fields id --- number --- service_desk_status_id -- created_on -- updated_on etc 2.ServiceDeskActivity with fields id -- service_desk_ticket_id -- description -- created_on -- updated_on 3.ServiceDeskAttachment id -- service_desk_ticket_id -- attachment -- created_on -- updated_on Relations as ServiceDeskticket has_many

Hi I''ve got a problem validating a boolean and I can''t see what the problem is. Here''s my model: class FinanceAgreement < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :asset validates_presence_of :finance_company validates_inclusion_of :balance, :in => 0.01..10_000_000 validates_inclusion_of :term, :in => 1..600 validates_numericality_of

I''ve got a really strange problem using belongs_to. I apologize in advance for the length... this is going to take a while to explain. Basic idea: Creating a User requires that the user enter an email address and activation key that matches an existing PendingUser. After creating the user successfully, that pending user should be marked as "used". The problem: When I