similar to: Storing an object in the db

I have a mock object (Person) that is associated with another object (my_object) through a belongs_to association. When I check whether my_object is valid (my_object.should be_valid), I am getting an error like the following: Mock "Person_6338" received unexpected message :marked_for_destruction? with (no args) Checking the list of methods on the mock,

Hi All, I''m trying to use a form to upload a photo that I will save using attachment_fu. I''m very new to Facebookr so I apologize if this is covered somewhere, but I''m kind of stumped. Here''s what I''m doing now: <% facebook_form_for(:my_object, :url => { :action => ''upload_photo'', :id => params[:id] }, :html => {

Hy guys, Inside my app I have a form which contains user information. Sometimes a have a form with a text_field as above: <%= form_remote_tag(:html => { :action => url_for(:controller => "my_controller", :action => "my_action") }) %> <%= text_field(''my_object'', ''my_parameter'', :maxlength =>

The new "pending" example feature reminds me of a feature I''ve been bouncing around in my head, to aid in refactoring. Often, when I''m changing existing behaviour, I know that certain aspects of the old behaviour should change. Imagine changing the "it" method to perhaps "not" or "old" or "removed"... The behaviour would be to

Hi all, I''m trying to pass more than one parameters using link_to_remote, but I''m getting a behaviour that seems quite strange to me. Here''s the code: link_to_remote ''some text'', :update => ''form'', :method => ''get'', :url => { :action =>

There are areas of my application that "want" to use a url structure like domain/<human_readable_param>/<Module>/<Controller>/<Action>/<Id> Please note that the human readable parameter I need to inject is NOT related to the <id> being used by the action/controller pair. It''s identifying a container object whose contains are operated

Hi! I''m trying to extend ActiveRecord''s find method (Rails 1.0, Ruby 1.8.2), but I recognize a strange behaviour of the "alias_method" call. I wrote a very simple script to explain my problem: ------------------------------------------------------ module ActiveRecordExtension def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) base.class_eval do

Hi, I am trying to validate a numeric value passed in from a form, which is saved in a MySQL db as decimal(9,2) Now problem is I need to ensure people don''t enter a form value like -. 003. In my validations, I have a validates_numericality_of check being done. Furthermore, in validate method, I have a check using an if statement such as : ((an_object[n].nil? or an_object[n] < 0) and

Hello How can I test equality with two objects when they include some attribute that is BigDecimal? if I make something like this: it "should ...whatever" do obj = Factory.create(:my_object) ... MyObject.first.should == obj end. FAILS This fails because the object expected is different from the object gotten, and the only difference are the BigDecimal attributes, that are

I would like to use the collection_select with a simply array as the source of the collection. My array looks like this: STATES = ["Alabama", "Alaska", "Texas"] and it is stored in my environment.rb I can''t figure out the syntax for the collection_select in this situation... collection_select("my_object", "state", what goes here??? ) I

I''m trying to add some code for my ActiveRecord class so that it is executed whenever an object is updated, this code is a seperate process that reads from the same table represented by my model class so when it runs it needs the database to be up to date. In the following situation this is fine: # MyModel def after_save `/usr/local/bin/update_models -i #{self.id}` end # controller

I didn''t get a chance to go to this meeting debating WebObjects Vs Rails, but here''s a report about it: http://desperatepundit.com/blog/cremes/technology/2006/02/15/WebObjects-versus-Ruby-On-Rails.html I don''t get what he''s saying, hand coding the model? yeah, you COULD ... but what about script/generate ??? And is that so what he said about security? --

Hi! Well, I thought this was easy, but for some reason it won''t work... Here is what I want to do: I am working on an API to a large database. The basic mapping is done, but I want to implement some convenience methods that take information for one object and does some calculations with it. The result should be accessible as attribute. So in a simple example: We have an object that

AFAICT this appears to be the first time you've clarified that you're talking about a situation where the compile-time checking happens using something other than format strings. In Pavel's original email, he suggested compile time checking and you mentioned that I didn't object to it. But if you go back and read my response, I said we can do the compile time checking *of the

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:40 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > You get compile time checking automatically when we can use c++14 though. > If you use it with a string literal, you'll get compile time checking, > otherwise you won’t. > > > I understand that, but

Hello: How do i make a mutiple select list for "nomodel" objects?I made that by using something like:<select name="" multiple="mutiple"><%=option groups collection for select(....)-%></select>.But when i select mutiple items and submit them,I can only get one selected item? Who can help me? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

How do I get ''save'' to execute without commit? I have tried: ActiveRecord::Base.connection.begin_db_transaction # do some stuff that doesn''t issue a database COMMIT statement # then: @myObject.save # this issues a COMMIT but it shouldn''t! Shouldn''t it wait until I''ve called: ActiveRecord::Base.connection.commit_db_transaction ? what am

I''ve notice that a project like Rubinius has both a spec & a test directory. Rspec has only a spec directory. Obviously I support BDD, but isn''t there also a place for state based/verification testing? I sometimes sense that I *do* want to practice Test Driven Development. That is, I want some assurance that my production code will run as intended. But I also

I can''t seem to figure out how to validate a few fields some1 please help me out model--------- class Record < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :sw, :flex end controller------------ class RecordController < A;;icationController def new @record = Rrecord.new @product = Product.find(params[''product_id'']) end def create

How can I find all the methods on an object from withing irb? Thanks, Joe