similar to: Random Forest % Variation vs Psuedo-R^2?

Hi all, When running a randomForest run using the following command: forestplas=randomForest(Prev~.,data=plas,ntree=200000) print(forestplas) I get the following result: Call: randomForest(formula = Prev ~ ., data = plas, ntree = 2e+05, importance = TRUE) Type of random forest: regression Number of trees: 2e+05 No. of variables tried at each split: 5

I have an equation describing the best-fit model for a set of points (just 2 axes) that is in the form: y=b+mx+px^2 Where b is the intercept, m is the slope describing a linear term, and p is a slope of the quadratic term. I would like to plot this equation on a curve (I know the equation is y=(.1766x^2)+(.171x)+.101) on the original scatterplot. Any easy way to plot this equation and

Dear Experts, My customer is migrating to Solaris 10 from Solaris 8 and have asked me to determine if: With Dtrace, is the user limited to probing only processes they own? The customer has a general security requirement to control user access via management of privileges. Currently, on Solaris 8, LDAP is strongly while RBAC is weakly applied. This will likely change in the Solaris 10 production

Hi all, I am using Puppet to execute an Expect script (http://expect.sourceforge.net) on a client. The Puppet recipe, test.pp, is: exec { ''/root/test.exp'': command => ''/root/test.exp'', logoutput => true } The recipe runs correctly when run using ''puppet --debug --verbose test.pp'': debug: /Stage[main]//Exec[/root/test.exp]:

Dear all,   I did ANOVA for many response variables (Var1, Var2, ....Var75000), and i got the result of p-value like below. Now, I want to select those predictors, which have pvalue less than or equal to 0.05 for each response variable. For example, X1, X2, X3, X4, X5 and X6 in case of Var1, and similarly, X1, X2.......X5 in case of Var2, only X1 in case of Var3 and none of the predictors in case

I am calculating the mean of each column grouped by the variable 'id'. I do this using aggregate, data.table, and plyr. My aggregate results do not match the other two, and I am trying to figure out what is incorrect with my syntax. Any suggestions? Thanks. Here is the data. myData <- structure(list(var1 = c(31.59, 32.21, 31.78, 31.34, 31.61, 31.61, 30.59, 30.84, 30.98, 30.79, 30.79,

Hi all, I have a data frame that looks like such: LATITUDE LONGITUDE TEMPERATURE TIME 36.73 -176.43 58.32 1 50.95 90.00 74.39 1 -30.42 5.45 23.26 1 15.81 -109.31 52.44 1 -80.75 -144.95 66.19 2 90.00 100.55 37.50 2

Hi, I have a dataframe like this: procedure property sensor_data sensor_date | | | | [1,] "PAT_Laser_2" "Distance" "30.42" "2010-09-30T15:00:12+0200" [2,] "PAT_Laser_2" "Distance" "31.22" "2010-10-31T15:05:07+0100"

Also there is a typo: it probably should read pseudo. Yuri

On Aug 26, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Yuri wrote: > Also there is a typo: it probably should read pseudo. A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture. Before emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded to real instructions. If you're seeing that error, it means that

On 08/26/2010 11:11, Bob Wilson wrote: > A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture. Before emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded to real instructions. If you're seeing that error, it means that something was not expanded. > So what is likely to

On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 11:11, Bob Wilson wrote: >> A pseudo instruction is used internally without llvm, but it does not correspond directly to a real instruction in the target architecture. Before emitting the final compiled code, all the pseudo instructions must be expanded to real instructions. If you're seeing that error, it means that

On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: > It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? > I don't know what is ToT. 42 meanings listed here http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/TOT don't seem to apply. Yuri

On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: >> It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? >> > > I don't know what is ToT. 42 meanings listed here http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/TOT don't seem to apply.\ ToT = "top of

On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: > Could you get it to print out the instruction when it happens? (just change the line above the error message to print it out to errs()). > > It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? > Insn before the error: TCRETURNri64 %RAX<kill>, 0,

On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Yuri wrote: > On 08/26/2010 11:53, Eric Christopher wrote: >> Could you get it to print out the instruction when it happens? (just change the line above the error message to print it out to errs()). >> >> It basically means that a pseudo wasn't lowered to something that the jit can output before the jit was run. Is this on ToT? >>

On Aug 27, 2010, at 3:43 PMPDT, Yuri wrote: > On 08/27/2010 12:13, Dale Johannesen wrote: > Here's what happens: > The first instruction created is RET. > SelectBasicBlock is called. > TCRETURNri64 is created from within it. > HasTailCall is set to true as you mentioned. > Cycle in SelectionDAGISel::SelectBasicBlock skips the rest. > > All like you described. But

Hi R-list, I'd like to extract the psuedo model matrix (derivative of fitted values wrt the parameters) from an nls object. Any suggestions? Thanks, Murray Jorgensen Dr Murray Jorgensen on leave from: Mathematics and Statistics Department of Statistics University of Victoria University of Waikato PO BOX 3045 STN CSC Hamilton, New Zealand

On Aug 27, 2010, at 10:49 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 11:34 PMPDT, Yuri wrote: > >> On 08/26/2010 13:17, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>>>> Insn before the error: TCRETURNri64 %RAX<kill>, 0, %RDI<kill>, %RAX<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, %RSP<imp-use>, ... >>>> >>>> Odd. I thought

On 08/26/2010 13:17, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> Insn before the error: TCRETURNri64 %RAX<kill>, 0, %RDI<kill>, >>> %RAX<imp-def,dead>, %RDI<imp-def,dead>, %RSP<imp-use>, ... >> >> Odd. I thought TCReturn was being lowered. At any rate can you file >> a bug with the .ll file that causes this? > > It should be getting