similar to: [sem package] path.diagram() ignores the edge.label argument ..?

hi, I have following data and code; cov <- c (1.670028 ,-1.197685 ,-2.931445,-1.197685,1.765646,3.883839,-2.931445,3.883839,12.050816) cov.matrix <- matrix(cov, 3, 3, dimnames=list(c("y1","x1","x2"), c("y1","x1","x2"))) path.model <- specify.model() x1 -> y1, x1-y1 x2 <-> x1, x2-x1 x2 <->

Hello, I finally run my measurement model in sem - successfully. Now, I am trying to print out the path diagram that is based on the results - but for some reason it's not working. Below is my script - but the problem is probably in my very last line: # ANALYSIS OF ANXIETY, DEPRESSION, AND FEAR - LISREL P.31 library(sem) # Creating the ANXIETY, DEPRESSION, AND FEAR intercorrelation matrix

Hello R Users, While I have attempted to dig into the R help files and I have not identified the answer to these questions, I apologize in advance if my questions were answered in the past. I also recognize that one of my questions unfortunately verges on statistical rather than code territory. I have two rather unrelated questions about using the sem and polycor packages for a relatively

Forgive me if I'm posting to the wrong place....It's my first time posting. Here's the situation: I'm using the sem package and making path diagrams using path.diagrams. Suppose I have the following code: #install.packages("ggm") require(ggm) cor = rcorr(7) nm = c("SOF", "IWF", "PWF", "FSC", "FSF", "EF",

I did a simple path analysis and tried to draw the path diagram. I used 'path.diagram' in sem package and produced a graph using dotty in graphviz; however, I don't know how to produce a graph from R directly. In the sem package manual John mentioned that "to obtain graphics output directly, the dot program must be on the system search path". Does anyone know how to set it

Hi experts, I just started to learn R today, and tried to work with an add-on package sem. I have a version of 2.3.1 on MacOS X 10.4.6 with sem put under /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/2.3/Resources/library However when I typed library(sem) the following error showed up: Error in library(sem) : 'sem' is not a valid package -- installed < 2.0.0? Why is this? Thank

Sorry if this question has been asked previously, I searched but found little. There also doesn't seem to be a dedicated SEM list-serv so hopefully this will find its way to the appropriate audience. In discussing SEM with a colleague I mentioned that a model they were fitting in AMOS was equivalent to a linear regression and that the coefficients would be the same. This of course was the

Hello, I have conducted an SEM in which the resultant standardized path coefficients are much higher than would be expected from the raw correlation matrix. To explore further, I stripped the model down to a simple bivariate relationship between two variables (NDVI, and species richness), where it's my understanding that the SEM's standardized path coefficient should equal the correlation

Hi, we are trying to do structural equation modelling on R. However, one of our predictor variables is categorical (smoker/nonsmoker). Now, if we want to run the sem() command (from the sem library), we need to specify a covariance matrix (cov). However, Pearson's correlation does not work on the dichotomous variable, so instead we produced a covariance matrix using the Spearman's (or

Hello, I use the function sem the following way sem.mod <- sem(model, mod.cov, N=109) where the variables are modelled: Z -> M Z -> I Z -> R M <-> M I <-> I R <-> R Z <-> Z The output is ... Normalized Residuals Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. -7.3300 -0.2750 -0.2670 -0.1290 -0.0369 9.0300 Parameter Estimates Estimate Std Error z value Pr(>|z|)

Hello, It has been found that SEM analysis using polychoric correlations + maximum likelihood estimator produces incorrect test statistics and standard errors (e.g., Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Con?rmatory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491). Standard errors can be dealt with by

Hi there, I just saw your question on the help list and tough you could help me with some start-up info.... I just downloaded the R project software to try running SEM analysis and I also downloaded the SEM package. But it just sits there on the desktop and R does not know where it is...I can¹t figure out how to organize the files...When I type ?sem in R it says object sem not found...I can¹t

Is it possible to fit a structural equation model with link functions in R? I am trying to build a logistic-regression-like model in sem, because incorporating the dichotomous variables linearly seems inappropriate. Mplus can do something similar by specifying a 'link' parameter, but I would like to be able to do it in R, ofcourse. I have explored the 'sem' package from John Fox,

Is there a "canned" function in R for finding the standard error of the mean? I have tried > sem <- function(x) c(mean =mean(x), + SEM = stdev(x)/sqrt(length(x))) > sem(pnet.lai) Error in sem(pnet.lai) : couldn't find function "stdev" It looks like there is no stdev function in R Thanks, Kirk Kirk R. Wythers email: kwythers at umn.edu University of

I am a new user of the function sem in package sem and lavaan for structural equation modeling 1. I don?t know what is the difference between this function and CFA function, I know that cfa for confirmatory analysis but I don?t know what is the difference between confirmatory analysis and structural equation modeling in the package lavaan. 2. I have data that I want to analyse but I have some

Hi. I have tried to use Package "SEM". As a learning, I try to convert a program running well of EQS which is as follows to SEM: ### EQS ### /SPECIFICATION CAS=100; VAR=5 MAT=COR; ANA=COR; /EQUATIONS V1=*F1+E1; V2=*F1+E2; V3=*F1+*F2+E3; V4=**F1+*F2*E4; V5=*F2+E5; /VAR E1 TO E5=*; F1*1.0; F2=1.0; /COV E1,E2=*; F1,F2=*: /PRINT FIT ALL; /MATRIX ...... /END This is the converted SEM

Hello. I am getting results from sem that are not correct (that's assuming that the results from my AMOS 4.0 software are correct). sem does not vary some of the parameters substantially from their starting values, and the final estimates of those parameters as well as the model chisquare value are incorrect. I've attached some code that replicates the problem. The parameters in

Hello, I am using the SEM package in R to fit a multigroup latent variable model and ran into some difficulties. I have 2 questions: 1. First, I am getting the following error message and wondering what to do to fix it: Error in solve.default((N[g] - 1) * robustVcov(mod.g, adj.obj = adj.objects[[g]])) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 4.52055e-23

I am new to R. I just tried to recreate in R (using sem package and the identical input data) a solution for a simple measurment model I have found before in LISREL. LISREL had no problems and converged in just 3 iterations. In sem, I got no solution, just the warning message: "Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge. in: sem.default(ram =

Hello all, I have an issue where I am generating data and trying to confirm the estimates using a sem. I keep getting an error about the degree of freedom being negative "Error in sem.default(ram, S = S, N = N, raw = raw, data = data, pattern.number = pattern.number, : The model has negative degrees of freedom = -6" Can someone explain this error or tell me what is wrong with my