similar to: prcomp(X,center=F) ??

Full_Name: Jerry W. Lewis Version: 2.7.0 OS: Windows XP Professional Submission from: (NULL) (198.180.131.16) If you are saying that there is no need to solve for the noncentrality parameter, please justify this amazing assertion. If you are saying that this need is already adequately addressed in R, then please enlighten me.

I sent a message a couple days ago about doing calculations for power of the ANOVA. Several people got back to me very quickly which I really appreciated. I'm working now on a similar problem, but instead of a balanced ANOVA, I have an unbalanced one. The first part of the question was: You assume that the within-population standard deviations all equal 9. You set the Type 1 error rate at á

Dear List: The square of the noncentral t-statistic with noncentrality parameter \delta is a noncentral F with noncentrality parameter \lambda=\delta^2. So, t^2_{\nu,\delta} = F_{1,\nu,\lambda=\delta^2}. Consequently, it should follow that t^2_{1-\alpha/2,\nu,\delta} = f_{1-alpha,1,\vu,\lambda=\delta^2}. However, this is not what is happening with the following code. The central

Hello Everyone, I've been told that the memory allocation in R and S-Plus is different, with R being better at doing simulations for whatever reason(s). I was wondering if anyone could enlighten me on the differences in the memory usage/allocation (preferably in layman's terms!). The reason I ask this is because of a simulation I am trying to run. In it, I need to use the pt( )

Hello All, Has anyone written a function for the distribution function of a *doubly* non-central F-distribution? I looked through the archives, but didn't find anything. Thanks! Wolfgang

Full_Name: Version: 1.9.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (134.126.93.191) I believe the noncentrality parameter, lambda, in power.anova.test is incorrect. The noncentrality paramter is defined as lambda <- (groups - 1) * n * (between.var/within.var). The n should not be there. The function pf defines the noncentrality parameter as the sum of squares of the means. Therefore, the

Hi everyone. I have a problem that I have been unable to determine either the best way to proceed and why the methods I'm trying to use sometimes fail. I'm using the pf() function in an optimization function to find a noncentrality parameter that leads to a specific value at a specified quantile. My goal is to have a general function that returns the noncentrality parameter that

Hi, I am making a game with Ruby/SDL and have run into trouble finding a GUI to cooperate. I have seen numerous examples of wxWindows in combination with SDL (wxPython and PyGame), but have yet to be able to do it in ruby (PyGame example: http://wiki.wxpython.org/index.cgi/IntegratingPyGame). I am not very good with wxRuby as this is my first time using it and thought some more knowledgable users

I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get MLE for mu and df. I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting distributions with R": library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 x<-x.gam

Hello I could not find whether there is any R-function that implements the inverse of a noncentral Beta. Could someone out there tell me where I can find it? Or how to implement it? Many thanks Ed [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Greetings, I am trying to figure out how to find the source code for R functions. I am specifically interested in finding the code for the "prcomp" function. I know that typing the function name without parenthesis will lead to the code (or to a .Internal or .FORTRAN or .C call). However, I don't really understand what is going on. For example, typing "mean" gives a

Hello, I did a pca with over 200000 snps for 340 observations (ids). If I plot the eigenvectors (called rotation in prcomp) 2,3 and 4 (e.g. plot (rotation[,2]) I see a strange "column" in my data (see attachment). I suggest it is an artefact (but of what?). Suggestion: I used prcomp this way: prcomp (mat), where mat is a matrix with the column means already substracted followed by a

Hi, I am trying to understand how the biplot.prcomp is constructed so I can manipulate it to emphasise particular observations and reduce the number of variables shown. The prcomp model I have ran has cor=TRUE and scale=TRUE I have worked out from looking at str(prcomp.model) that... prcomp.model$x = the observations ploted in the biplot prcomp.model$rotation = the variables that form the

The following seems to be an bug in prcomp(): > test <- ts( matrix( c(NA, 2:5, NA, 7:10), 5, 2)) > test Time Series: Start = 1 End = 5 Frequency = 1 Series 1 Series 2 1 NA NA 2 2 7 3 3 8 4 4 9 5 5 10 > prcomp(test, scale.=TRUE, na.action=na.omit) Erro en svd(x, nu = 0) : infinite or missing values in 'x'

Full_Name: Ryszard Czerminski Version: 1.8.1 OS: GNU/Linux Submission from: (NULL) (205.181.102.120) prcomp(..., scale = TRUE) does not work correctly: $ uname -a Linux 2.4.20-28.9bigmem #1 SMP Thu Dec 18 13:27:33 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) > a <- matrix(rnorm(6), nrow = 3) > sum((scale(a %*% svd(cov(a))$u, scale

Hello, not understanding the output of prcomp, I reduce the number of components and the output continues to show cumulative 100% of the variance explained, which can't be the case dropping from 8 components to 3. How do i get the output in terms of the cumulative % of the total variance, so when i go from total solution of 8 (8 variables in the data set), to a reduced number of

Hello all. It seems that the pf() function when used with noncentral parameters can behave badly at times. I've included some examples below, but what is happening is that with some combinations of df and ncp parameters, regardless of how large the quantile gets, the same probability value is returned. Upon first glance noncentral values greater than 200 may seem large, but they are in

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD

Hi All: I am running prcomp on a very large array, roughly [500000, 3650]. The array itself is 16GB. I am running on a Unix machine and am running ?top? at the same time and am quite surprised to see that the application memory usage is 76GB. I have the ?tol? set very high (.8) so that it should only pull out a few components. I am surprised at this memory usage because prcomp uses the SVD

Hello, Can you get eigenvalues in addition to eigevectors using prcomp? If so how? I am unable to use princomp due to small sample sizes. Thank you in advance for your help! Rebecca Young -- Rebecca Young Graduate Student Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Badyaev Lab University of Arizona 1041 E Lowell Tucson, AZ 85721-0088 Office: 425BSW rlyoung at email.arizona.edu (520) 621-4005