Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "plot confidence limits of a regression line - problem"
2012 Jul 30
2
distance matrix and hclustering
Dear R Users,i am very new to R. I want your help on an issue regarding distance matrix and cluster analysis
i had discharge data of 4 rivers(a,b,c,d) in 4 vectors each having 364 values
> dput(qmu)structure(list(a = c(0.26, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.24, 0.23, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.21, 0.2, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.18, 0.18, 0.18, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17,
2010 Feb 17
2
extract the data that match
Hi r-users,
I would like to extract the data that match. Attached is my data:
I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no'
> cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)
z intg rand_no
[1,] 0.00 0.000 0.001
[2,] 0.01 0.000 0.002
[3,] 0.02 0.000 0.002
[4,] 0.03 0.000 0.003
[5,] 0.04 0.000 0.003
[6,]
2013 May 15
1
x and y lengths differ
I have a problem with R. I try to compute the confidence interval for my
df. When I want to create the plot I have this problem: Error in
xy.coords(x, y, xlabel, ylabel, log) : 'x' and 'y' lengths differ.
I try this code:
library(dplR)
df.rwi <- detrend(rwl = df, method = "Spline",nyrs=NULL)
write.table(df.rwi,file="rwi.txt",quote=FALSE,row.names=TRUE)
2000 Feb 21
3
incompatibilities between 0.90 and 0.99?
Maybe this is dumb, but I seem to be having problems reading a file saved in R
v. 0.99 into R 0.90.1 (in a different machine).
I did
>save(test1, file="test1.RData")
then I tried to read that data file in R 0.90.1:
>load("test1.RData")
Error in load("test1.RData") : restore file corrupted -- no data loaded
More info:
- both machines are running Linux;
2010 Dec 30
2
optim and singularity
Hello,
I was unable to find clues to my problem in ?optim. Using the data and code
below, I get an error ("system is exactly singular") when a particular line
of code is left in, but have found that 'optim' works when I comment it out.
The line of code in question is after the closeAllConnections() line of code
and contains a call to "na.approx" from the zoo package.
2007 Apr 25
1
help
Hi all,
I have 2 questions:
1)How do I calculate the mean on an imported txt file? I've imported the
file below and that's what it looks like imported. How do I then calcuate
the mean, median, or mode on the column LeafArea using the desktop R
package?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks,
Nat
LeafType Leaflets LeafArea ShapeRatio LeafWeight LeafThickness
1 1
2011 Jan 19
1
Using subset to filter data table
I am having difficulty understanding how I would constrain a data set by
filtering out 'records' based on certain criteria.
Using SQL I could query using 'select * from my.data where LithClass in
('sand', 'clay')' or some such.
Using subset, there seem to be ghosts left behind (that is, all of the
LithClass *.Labels* remain after subset)
> dput(tcc)
2007 Sep 18
10
Routes
hi all,
I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the
controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and
give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is
simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a
controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest
of the routing would be done at the controller level.
2013 May 23
4
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
Below are the results for the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks compiled with llvm/compiler-rt/dragonegg 3.3svn at r182439 against current
FSF gcc 4.7.3svn and 4.8.1svn. The only major bug remaining in the dragonegg 3.3svn support for gcc 4.8.x is http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15980
which results in unresolved symbols for _iround and _iroundf in the aermod and rnflow testcases. Note that this
2013 May 29
0
[LLVMdev] Polyhedron 2005 results for dragonegg 3.3svn
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch,
> so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great
> if you could redo the benchmarks rc3.
>
Duncan,
As requested, appended are the updated Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results with both RC1 and RC3 llvm 3.3
2010 Jun 04
1
How do I 'merge' a altered subset of a data.frame back into the same data.frame
Hi
Step 1: I create a data.frame called iolm.
Step 2: I create a conditional subset i_wtr.
Step 3: In this subset I add 0.3 to all values in the IOLM_AST column.
Step 4: Now I am looking for the best way to Œmerge¹ the altered subset back
into the original iolm data.frame
## STEP 1
>iolm
ID IOLM_AST IOLM_AXIS
1 1 1.15 165.33
2 2 1.20 79.00
3 3 0.40
2012 Apr 03
3
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
>> Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn
>> on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3.
>
> thanks for the numbers. How does this compare to LLVM 3.0 - were there any
> regressions?
The results from just before
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2012 Apr 03
0
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:57:51 -0400
Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Hi Jack,
> >
> >> Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current
> >> llvm/dragonegg svn on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode
> >> 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3.
> >
>
2005 May 23
3
Dickey-Fuller Test
Hi All ,
Could you please tell using which library ,Dickey-Fuller Test can be run?
Thanks a lot
__________________________________________________
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2011 Nov 16
3
Interpolating hourly basis
I have a huge data set in the form of
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6
1 201005010000201005010000 1.68291.38 1 0
2 201005010000201005010300 0.93335.10 1 0
3 201005010000201005010600 2.25 57.38 1 0
4 201005010000201005010900 0.43 13.76 1 0
5 201005010000201005011200 0.74101.14 1 0
I am interested in interpolating it on an hour basis(it's for avery
2012 Apr 02
6
[LLVMdev] pb05 results for current llvm/dragonegg
Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn
on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. The benchmarks
for -msse3 and -msse4 appear identical (at least for degg+optnz). This is fortunate
since there seems to be a bug in -msse4 on 2.33 GHz (T7600) Intel Core 2 Duo Merom
(http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12434).