similar to: Descriptive stats for factors in SEM

Hello I am using sem to look at the direct effect of one variable on another but i am uncertain if i am progressing correctly. An example: covar1<-? matrix(c(0.4,-0.2,3,-0.2 , 0.3,-2 , 3 ,-2 , 60), nrow=3,byrow=T) rownames(covar1)<-colnames(covar1)<-c("endo","exo","med") path1<-matrix(c(? ? "exo -> endo",? "g1", NA,

Hi, (1.) How is it possible to get automatic a "lower triangle of correlation matrix" ? h.cor <- cor(dat,use="pairwise.complete.obs") zz <- lower.tri(h.cor,diag=T) ### that's not what i wish and "wrong" ? results <- matrix(unlist(h.cor[upper.tri(h.cor,diag=T)])) results <- matrix(unlist(h.cor[upper.tri(h.cor,diag=T)]),5) Must i take the lowest

I am new to R. I just tried to recreate in R (using sem package and the identical input data) a solution for a simple measurment model I have found before in LISREL. LISREL had no problems and converged in just 3 iterations. In sem, I got no solution, just the warning message: "Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge. in: sem.default(ram =

Is it possible to fit a structural equation model with link functions in R? I am trying to build a logistic-regression-like model in sem, because incorporating the dichotomous variables linearly seems inappropriate. Mplus can do something similar by specifying a 'link' parameter, but I would like to be able to do it in R, ofcourse. I have explored the 'sem' package from John Fox,

Hi, I would like to use the sem package to perform a path analysis (no latent variables) with a mixture of 2 nominal exogenous, 1 continuous exogenous, and 4 continuous endogenous variables. I seek advice as to how to calculate the appropriate covariance matrix for use with the sem package. I have read through the polycor package, and am confused as to the use of "numeric" for

Hello. I started using the sem package in R and after a lot of searching and trying things I am still having difficulty. I get the following error message when I use the sem() function: Warning message: In sem.default(ram = ram, S = S, N = N, param.names = pars, var.names = vars, : Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge. I started with a

I'm not aware of any routine that those the job, although I think that it could be relatively easily done by multiplication the manifest variable vector with the estimates for the specific effect. To make an example: v1; v2; v3; v4 are manifest variables that loads on one y latent variablein a data frame called "A" the code for the model should be like: model <-specifymodel( y

Hello, I am using the SEM package in R to fit a multigroup latent variable model and ran into some difficulties. I have 2 questions: 1. First, I am getting the following error message and wondering what to do to fix it: Error in solve.default((N[g] - 1) * robustVcov(mod.g, adj.obj = adj.objects[[g]])) : system is computationally singular: reciprocal condition number = 4.52055e-23

Dear users, i'm using the sem package in R, because i need to improve a confermative factor analisys. I have so many questions in my survey, and i suppose, for example, that Question 1 (Q1) Q2 and Q3 explain the same thing (factor F1), Q4,Q5 and Q6 explain F2 and Q7 and Q8 explain F3... For check that what i supposed is true, i run this code to see if the values of loadings are big or not.

What??s happening with this following code: require(sem) Celpe.Mod.RAM <- matrix(c( # path parametro Inicio "Produ????o -> T1", "gamma.11", NA, "Produ????o -> T2", "gamma.12", NA,

Hello, is there a similar package like SEM. In fact, I am looking for a package where I as input several given vector variables which are part of an autoregressive model. Then I would like to obtan parameters for so called latent variables. Thank you, Luba [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am a new user of the function sem in package sem and lavaan for structural equation modeling 1. I don?t know what is the difference between this function and CFA function, I know that cfa for confirmatory analysis but I don?t know what is the difference between confirmatory analysis and structural equation modeling in the package lavaan. 2. I have data that I want to analyse but I have some

Can somebody help me with the following issue (SEM in R), please:   When I run the model (includes second order models) in R, it gives me the following:   1)       In sem.default(ram = ram, S = S, N = N, param.names = pars, var.names = vars,  :   Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge.   2)       I have aliased parameters and NaNS   or sometimes when

Hi - I am trying to fit sem model with intercepts. Here is what I have in my model. Exogeneous vars: x1 (continous), x2 (ordinal), x3 (ordinal), x4(continuous) Endogeneous vars: y1 (continuous), y2 (ordinal), y3 (ordinal) SEM model: x1 -> eta1; x2 -> eta1; x3 -> eta2; x4 -> eta2; eta1 -> y1, eta1 -> y2, eta2 -> y2, eta2 -> y3 However, in these arrow models, I

Hello all, I have an issue where I am generating data and trying to confirm the estimates using a sem. I keep getting an error about the degree of freedom being negative "Error in sem.default(ram, S = S, N = N, raw = raw, data = data, pattern.number = pattern.number, : The model has negative degrees of freedom = -6" Can someone explain this error or tell me what is wrong with my

HI, I am testing several models about three latent constructs that measure risk attitudes. Two models with different structure obtained identical of fit measures from chisqure to BIC. Model1 assumes three factors are correlated with each other and model two assumes a higher order factor exist and three factors related to this higher factor instead of to each other. Model1: model.one

Dear All, I am new for R and SEM. I try to fit the model with Y (ordinal outcome), X (4 categorical data), M1-M3 (continuous), and 2 covariates (Age&sex) as a diagram. library(polycor) model.ly <-specify.model() 1: x -> m1, gam11, NA 2: x -> m2, gam12, NA 3: x -> m3, gam13, NA 4: age -> m1, gam14, NA 5: age -> m2, gam15, NA 6: age -> m3, gam16, NA 7: sex -> m1,

Dear expeRts, sorry for such a newbie question - in PCA/factor analysis e.g. in SPSS it is possible to save scores from the factors. Is it analogously possible to "save" the implied scores from the latent variables in a measurement model or structural model e.g. using the sem or lavaan packages, to use in further analyses? Best wishes Steve Powell www.promente.org | skype

I've just found the lavaan package, and I really appreciate it, as it seems to succeed with models that were failing in sem::sem. I need some clarification, however, in the output, and I was hoping the list could help me. I'll go with the standard example from the help documentation, as my problem is much larger but no more complicated than that. My question is, why is there one latent

Dear list members, In sem, std.coef() will give me standardized coefficients from a sem model. But is there a trick so that path.diagram can use these coefficients rather than unstandardized ones? Thanks Steve Powell From: John Fox <jfox_at_mcmaster.ca> Date: Wed 28 Feb 2007 - 14:37:22 GMT Dear Tim, See ?standardized.coefficients (after loading the sem package). Regards, John John