similar to: adding rows as arithmatic calculation on original rows

With primitive types, I can interchange literal usage and type aliases in IR: %mytype = type i32 define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store i32 *%t1*, *i32** %ptr ret void } But for structs, I cannot: %mytype = type { i32, i32 } define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store* { i32, i32 }* %t1, *{ i32, i32 }** %ptr ret void }

Hello, I'm trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM's default behavior is to pass structures by reference. I'm not disputing the benefits of this but I really want to change the default behavior for experimentation purposes. To this end I've changed the code in DefaultABIInfo::classifyArgumentType() to

Justin, http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#structure-type "Identified types can be recursive, can be opaqued, and are never uniqued." Do you think it would be less descriptive? "Identified type, aka named llvm::StructType, is never uniqued against other identified types nor literal types, aka unnamed StructType(s)." ? See also;

Dear R-users, I am trying to use the grep function to test whether a particular string is of the form "n.../mydir/myfile.mytype.myext". Anything between n and mytype could vary, and anything after mytype could vary. I tried to proceed by steps to build my regular expression... but I do not really understand why the last call of the following code do not work. Any help would be

Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Martinez, Javier E < javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote: > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > I’m trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to > functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM’s default behavior is to > pass structures by reference. I’m not disputing the benefits of this but I > really want to

Hi all, I''m struggling with the following: I have a defined type wrapped in a class: class myclass { define mytype(bla) { file { "blabla": .... } exec { "blablabla": ... } } } And I access the defined type in my other class by doing this: class otherclass { include myclass myclass::mytype { "alb": ... } # and here I want to

Hi, Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was trying to say: On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> +1 Exactly this. >> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much >> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the >>

2017-01-10 0:06 GMT+01:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:59 PM Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was >> trying to say: >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das >> <sanjoy at

Hi everyone, I have been trying to extend Rcpp with my own wrap and as templates. Two issues: 1) I need to explicitly call wrap. Is that expected? So for example I wrote this specialization: template<> SEXP Rcpp::wrap(std::vector<TimedOptDouble> const& entries) { std::vector<double> sec_times; std::vector<double> doubles; for(auto const& entry : entries) {

Let''s start with this: class whatever ( $myType=''other'' ) { file { "some-config-file": ... content => $myType ? { ''this'' => template("whatever/this.erb"), ''that'' => template("whatever/that.erb"), ''other'' =>

2017-01-09 19:25 GMT+01:00 Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>: > > On Jan 9, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2017-01-09 16:15 GMT+01:00 Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>:

Hi, I'm having a play with LLVM to implement a custom language (for my intellectual curiosity only). I'm wondering how, when using IRBuilder, one can can it to emit a recursive type definition? The code for TypeBuilder explicitly states that it doesn't handle recursive types... I'm after being able to emit, programmatically, stuff like the Named Types example in the Language

Hello. I have an .bc, which defines @foo(%type* arg1, %type* arg2, %type* arg3). Firstly, i do this: runtimeModule = getLazyIRFileModule("runtime.bc", smd, llctx); then this: fooFunction = runtimeModule->getFunction("foo"); myType = runtimeModule->getTypeByName("type"); After that, i'm creating another module: myModule = new Module("My

still pretty new to Ruby, please bare with me :) Say I have a module with a custom type, structured like so: [modules]/mymodule/manifests/init.pp [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/provider/mytype/foo.rb [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/type/mytype.rb In foo.rb, I''d like to call some custom ruby functions in a module and/ or class. These are generic functions that may be used in other modules,

On Apr 22, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > If you'd like to propose clarified language once you've wrapped your > head around the framework, I'd be happy to incorporate it. Most > ideally, submit a patch against GarbageCollection.html in http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/ > . Cool. Ok, I have already submitted some svn diffs to Chris to fix

Before I spend a lot of time trying to replicate a procmail script that automatically sorts list mail into mailboxes based on the List-ID header (and possibly some other data) I thought I'd check if someone had already done this for sieve. Basically, what I do now in procmail is 1. Get the listname from the List-ID header (or List-post/List-owner if no ID) 2. check against a list of

I am new to Rails and Ruby, and to OO languages, and seem to be making a very silly mistake somewhere here. Can anybody help? I am trying to write an application which involves ''exercises'', each of which consists of several ''templates''. This is based on MySQL tables with these names. I have models and controllers, built with the Rails Scaffold, for both

2017-04-01 15:59 GMT+02:00 Piotr Padlewski <piotr.padlewski at gmail.com>: > > > 2017-03-31 23:20 GMT+02:00 Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>: > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> On March 31, 2017 at 1:07:12 PM, Piotr Padlewski >> (piotr.padlewski at gmail.com) wrote: >> > [snip] >> > Do I understand it correctly, that it is legal to

Hi, About a year ago (I think I was using v4.2.x at the time), I extended the schema of my Samba AD. This worked just fine and since then I have been able to create and edit objects from my custom schema via ADSIEdit. This worked fine under 4.3.x as well - the last such object I successfully created was just over two months ago, at which point I was running some variant of 4.3.x (probably 4.3.5).

Dear all, Since my package is based on S4 classes, I would like to know how to add a slot to an existing S4 class without breaking the code of users of my package. Assume the following S4 class: setClass("MyClass", representation(name = "character", type = "character", data = "data.frame" ), prototype(name =