similar to: kruskal test in R

I have to start by saying that I am new to R, so I might miss something crucial here. It seems to me that the results of friedman.test and ks.test are "wrong". Now, obviously, the first thing which crossed my mind was "it can't be, this is a package used by so many, someone should have observed", but I can't figure out what it might be. Problem: let's start with

Hi, based on the sample size I want to calculate whether to correlation coefficients are significantly different or not. I know that as a first step both coefficients have to be converted to z values using fisher's z transformation. I have done this already but I dont know how to further proceed from there. unlike for correlation coefficients I know that the difference for z values is

Hello, I think I am right in saying that a 2 sample wilcox.test is equal to a 2 sample kruskal.test and a 2 sample t.test is equal to a 2 sample anova. This is also stated in the ?kruskal.test man page: The Wilcoxon rank sum test (wilcox.test) as the special case for two samples; lm together with anova for performing one-way location analysis under normality assumptions; with Student's t

Hi, I am trying to do a kruskal wallis test on two lists, fVisited and cSN: fVisited[[1]] [1] 0.17097623 0.30376141 0.17577266 0.14951855 0.03959753 0.08096217 0.05744888 0.02196257.... .... cSN[[1]] [1] 0.08557303 0.36477791 0.19601252 0.12981040 0.05351320 0.10385542 0.03539577 0.03106175.... So if I just want to do a test on just one of the entries this is simple enough:

Hi, I have got two groups of samples; and for every row, I wish to calculate Kruskal-Wallis' p-value. In the example below, and the stars (****) show where I am struggling to design and put things together. Any help would be appreciated. myFile <- data.frame(Sample_1a = 1:10, Sample_1b = 2:11, Sample_1c = 3:12, Sample_2a=4:13, Sample_2b=7:16, row.names=LETTERS[1:10]) groups <- rep

Hi, ?kruskal.test() ?a<- c(2,4,5,2,7) ?b<- c(2,2,6) ?c<- c(3,7,9,3) ?kruskal.test(list(a,b,c)) # ?#? Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test # #data:? list(a, b, c) #Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 2.003, df = 2, p-value = 0.3673 A.K. Hi I need an expression in R to apply a kruskal.test to this data (for example). a ? a ? a ? a ? ?a ? ?b ? b ? ?b ? ?c ? ?c ? c ? ?c 2 ?4 ? ?5 ? 2 ? ?7 ? ?2 ? 2 ?

Hi all My data table (g) contains a continues data column (plant.height) and other columns (columns 8 to 57), each with number of levels of different factors. ANOVA test was done and the p-values were extracted as follos: a <- function(x) anova(lm(plant.height ~ x))$"Pr(>F)"[1] r<- apply(g[,8:57],2,a) If I try to do a Kruskal-Wallis test : kw <- function(x)

Hi everyone, I am working on analyzing spectra which requires hundreds of kruskal wallis tests to be performed. Once significant results are found post tests are performed ect. My questions are: how do I perform all these kw tests and save just the pvalues in a table? Is there anyway to have R automatically perform post tests if a result of p<0.05 is found? Currently when I run the test

I submit a couple options for addressing bug 16719: kruskal.test documentation for formula. https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16719 disallow-character.diff changes the documentation and error message to indicate that factors are accepted. allow-character.diff changes the kruskal.test functions to convert character vectors to factors; documentation is updated accordingly. I

Hi. i have a data, and there is 3 columns, Month, Year and Total. and there is over 1000 rows for them because there is 87 years data for every month, so there is month from Jan-Dec, and year from 1900-1987, so i was wondering if i would want to make 12 groups (Jan,Feb.......,Dec), and put each year's total into the corresponding month (so every month group will have 88 values of total) how

Hi all, The Kruskal-Wallis test is a generalization of the two-sample Mann-Whitney test to *k* samples. That being the case, the Kruskal-Wallis test with *k*=2 should give an identical p-value to the Mann-Whitney test, should it not? x1<-c(1:5) x2<-c(6,8,9,11) a<-wilcox.test(x1,x2,paired=FALSE) b<-kruskal.test(list(x1,x2),paired=FALSE) a$p.value [1] 0.01587302 b$p.value [1]

Hi I need to test scores from questionnaires ADDQoL by age group by Kruskal test. But he wrote me: kruskal.test (wis1 ~ vekkat) Error in kruskal.test.default (c (-2, -4, 0, -1, -1, -3, 0, -4, 0, -1, 0,: all group levels must be finite Vekkat is as.factor and wis1 is as.nuemric How to remove this error? Please advise me. Thank you [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I am running Kruskal-Walis test in R. When I try to save results using write.table it gives me the following error : Error in as.data.frame.default(x[[i]], optional = TRUE, stringsAsFactors = stringsAsFactors) : cannot coerce class "htest" into a data.frame The overall code is as follows : >data_file = read.table("~/DATA.dir/data_file.txt", header=T)

Hello R gurus, I am a beginner with R. I am doing an ANCOVA analysis using 'aov,' and need some help understanding how 'aov' works. I have a dataset (taken from http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/ch17pt2.html) looking at hypnotic induction. The variable 'X' is a measure of how susceptible the subject is to being hypnotized, the variable 'Y' is how well the

Hi, I have searched and found a response to a question similar to mine but when I tried the code, R says it's not an actual function so I thought I'd ask here. http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4633035/Cookies.csv Cookies.csv I have attached the data I am using. I am trying to look at two things: how moisture content changes over time, and how it changes along the length of a log

Hi there, I am doing multiple comparisons for data that is not normally distributed. For this purpose I tried both functions kruskal{agricolae} and kruskalmc{pgirmess}. It confuses me that these functions do not yield the same results although they are doing the same thing, don't they? Can anyone tell my why this happens and which function I can trust? kruskalmc() tells me that there are no

Dear R users, I would like to know if there is a way in R to execute a post-hoc test (factor levels comparison, like Tukey for ANOVA) of a non-parametric analysis of variance with kruskal.test() function. I am comparing three different groups. The preliminary analysis using the kruskal-wallis-test show significance, but I still don''t know the relationship and the significance level

I followed the threads that enquired about doing post-hoc tests after doing Kruskal testing. It took me to npmc. But npmc is giving an output I do not understand. I noticed a thread entitled "npmc function: 'x' must be atomic" but there never appeared to be a resolution. > npmc(npmcinput) Error in sort(unique.default(x), na.last = TRUE) : 'x' must be atomic

Hello, Is there like the kruskal wallis test in relation to ANOVA (no restrictions on normallity and variance homogenity) something (in R) for MANOVA? thanks -- Dr.Nicolaas Busscher Universit?t GH Kassel Nordbahnhofstrasse: 1a, D-37213 Witzenhausen Phone: 0049-(0)5542-98-1715, Fax: 0049-(0)5542-98-1713

Hola. Llevo poco tiempo con R y estoy atascado en un problemilla, a ver si podéis ayudarme. Estoy trabajando con una base de datos sobre personalidad en diferentes especies de aves. Esta base tiene datos de más de 7000 individuos y me gustaría crear un bucle mediante el cual realizar un test de Kruskal Wallis por cada especie (quiero ver si los comportamientos son consistentes dentro de cada