similar to: ordered logistic regression of survey data with missing variables

I'm trying to learn how to calibrate/postStratify/rake survey data in preparation for a large survey effort we're about to embark upon. As a working example, I have results from a small survey of ~650 respondents, ~90 response fields each. I'm trying to learn how to (properly?) apply the aforementioned functions. My data are from a bus on board survey. The expansion in the

G'Day R users! Following an ordination using prcomp, I'd like to test which variables singnificantly contribute to a principal component. There is a method suggested by Peres-Neto and al. 2003. Ecology 84:2347-2363 called "bootstrapped eigenvector". It was asked for that in this forum in January 2005 by J?r?me Lema?tre: "1) Resample 1000 times with replacement entire

Dear R-Users, Is anyone aware of a significance test which allows demonstrating that one distribution dominates another? Let F(t) and G(t) be two distribution functions, the alternative hypothesis would be something like: F(t) >= G(t), for all t null hypothesis: F(t) < G(t), for some t. Best wishes, Matthias PS. This one would be ok, as well: F(t) > G(t), for all t null

Hello, I am running polychoric correlations on a dataset composed of 12 ordinal and binary variables (N =384), using the polycor package. One of the association (between 2 dichotomous variables) is very high using the 2-step estimate (0.933 when polychoric run only between the two variables; but 0.801 when polychoric run on the 12 variables). The same correlation run with ML estimate returns a

Dear List: I am working to understand some differences between the results of the svymean() function in the survey package and from code I have written myself. The results from svymean() also agree with results I get from SAS proc surveymeans, so, this suggests I am misunderstanding something. I am never comfortable with "I did what the software" does mentality, so I am working to

I am trying to install R on a SLED 10.1 machine. R-base-2.7.0-7.1-i586.rpm fails with stas at linux-6b8s:~/RPMs> rpm -Uvh R-base-2.7.0-7.1.i586.rpm warning: R-base-2.7.0-7.1.i586.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 14ec5930 error: Failed dependencies: libgfortran.so.1 is needed by R-base-2.7.0-7.1.i586 I tried to trick it into believing there's the library by setting up

what does R have to compare with , say , proc surveymeans, estimate survey means/proportions with standard errors, using Taylor methods? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear there, I am working on the NHANES survey data, and want to apply quantile regression on these complex survey data. Does anyone know how to do this? Thank you in advance, Yiling Cheng Yiling J. Cheng MD, PhD Epidemiologist CoCHP, Division of Diabetes Translation Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4770 Buford Highway, N.E. Mailstop K-10 Atlanta, GA 30341 [[alternative HTML

Dear R users, I am trying to import a table from STATA, a dta file. With a table called "table", this is what I do : library("foreign") read.dta(table) It does not work. What am I doing wrong ? Best Regards, Dwayne [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Is it possible to fit a structural equation model with link functions in R? I am trying to build a logistic-regression-like model in sem, because incorporating the dichotomous variables linearly seems inappropriate. Mplus can do something similar by specifying a 'link' parameter, but I would like to be able to do it in R, ofcourse. I have explored the 'sem' package from John Fox,

Hi I have used the amelia command from the Amelia R package. this gives me a number of imputed datasets. This may be a silly question, but i am not a statistician, but I am not sure how to combine these results to obtain the imputed dataset to usse for further statistical analysis. I have looked through the amelia and zelig manuals but still can not find the answer. This maybe because I dont

Dear list useRs, I have to generate a random set of coordinates (x,y) in [-1 ; 1]^2 for say, N points. At each of these points is drawn a circle (later on, an ellipse) of random size, as in: > N <- 100 > > positions <- matrix(rnorm(2 * N, mean = 0 , sd= 0.5), nrow=N) > sizes<-rnorm(N, mean = 0 , sd= 1) > plot(positions,type="p",cex=sizes) My problem is to

> the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL. If you're doing a conversion from LLVM IR to some other non-SSA IR (like the tool's), you can do the phi node removal yourself as you convert. Basically, every predecessor block referenced by a phi node will have an assignment to that variable before branching. There are techniques to make the resultant

On 30.8.2011, at 19.19, Eli Friedman wrote: > reg2mem won't do quite this transformation... not sure exactly what you need. I need to get rid of phis. This code is compiled from C++ and for some functions there are no phis, but multiple call instructions. I am targeting hardware in the end, and the next tool reading the IR does not like phis when it's generating VHDL. My questions may

Hello, I have a general question about combining imputations as well as a question specific to the rms and Hmisc packages. The situation is multiple regression on a data set where multiple imputation has been used to give M imputed data sets. I know how to get the combined estimate of the covariance matrix of the estimated coefficients (average the M covariance matrices from the individual

Hello! If I understand this listserve correctly, I can email this address to get help when I am struggling with code. If this is inaccurate, please let me know, and I will unsubscribe. I have been struggling with the same error message for a while, and I can't seem to get past it. Here is the issue: I am using a data set that uses -1:-9 to indicate various kinds of missing data. I changed

Hi listers, I want to make lattice plots xyplots with the indication of legends inside each panel with only the points and the lines actually ploted inside each given panel according to the group(ing) factor. The code below shows what I have achieved so far and I hope will make clear what I want to have. It seems to me that my solution is a very "dirty hack" and there certainly is

Dear R-help, I am trying to impute missing data for the first time using R. The norm package seems to work for me, but the missing values that it returns seem odd at times -- for example it returns negative values for a variable that should only be positive. Does this matter in data analysis, and/or is there a way to limit the imputed values to be within the minimum and maximum of the actual

Dear alltogether, I experience very strange behavior of imputation of NA's with the NORM library. I use R 2.2.0, win32. The code is below and the same dataset was also tried with MICE and aregImpute() from HMISC _without_ any problem. The problem is as follows: (1) using the whole dataset results in very strange imputations - values far beyond the maximum of the respective column, >

Dear all, I have been attempting to use multiple imputation (MI) to handle missing data in my study. I use the mice package in R for this. The deeper I get into this process, the more I realize I first need to understand some basic concepts which I hope you can help me with. For example, let us consider two arbitrary variables in my study that have the following missingness pattern: Variable 1