similar to: gamboost partial fit prediction

Dear useRs, we are happy to announce the release of mboost 2.0-0 on CRAN: http://cran.r-project.org/package=mboost This version contains major updates and changes to the implementation of the main algorithm. Some slight changes to the user-interface where necessary. Please consult the manual and the list of CHANGES below. The package 'mboost' (Model-based Boosting) implements

Dear useRs, we are happy to announce the release of mboost 2.0-0 on CRAN: http://cran.r-project.org/package=mboost This version contains major updates and changes to the implementation of the main algorithm. Some slight changes to the user-interface where necessary. Please consult the manual and the list of CHANGES below. The package 'mboost' (Model-based Boosting) implements

I'm attempting to fit boosted regression trees to a censored response using IPCW weighting. I've implemented this through two libraries, mboost and gbm, which I believe should yield models that would perform comparably. This, however, is not the case - mboost performs much better. This seems odd. This issue is meaningful since the output of this regression needs to be implemented in a

Sorry for the tardy reply but I just found your posting incidentally today. To make long things short: You are right about the centering. We forgot to correct the intercept if center = TRUE. We lately found the problem ourself and fixed it in the current version (mboost 2.0-3). However the problem only occurred if you extracted the coefficients. As the intercept is rarely interpretable we

Full_Name: Ivan the Terrible Version: 2.9.2 OS: Windows XP SP3 Submission from: (NULL) (89.110.13.151) When using the method blackboost_fit of the package mboost appear following error : Error in party:::get_variables(obj at responses) : trying to get slot "responses" from an object (class "boost_data") that is not an S4 object Simple test case that produce bug:

mboost contains a blackboost method to build tree-based boosting models. I tried to write my own "cost-sensitive" ada family. But obviously my understanding to implement ngradient, loss, and offset functions is not right. I would greatly appreciate if anyone can help me out, or show me how to write a cost-sensitive family, thanks! Follows are some families I wrote ngradient <-

Hi all, First of all, I'm a novice R user (less that a week), so perhaps my code isn't very efficient. Using the MBoost package I created a model using the following command and saved it to a file for later use: model <- gamboost(fpfm,data=SampleClusterData,baselearner="bbs") # Creating a model save(model,file="model.RData") # Saving a model After this, during a

I am having trouble predicting new data with a model created from package mboost: > mb1<-glmboost(as.formula(formula1),data=data_train,control=boost_control(mstop=400,nu=.1)) > f.predict<-predict(mb1,newdata=data_train) Error in scale.default(X, center = cm, scale = FALSE) : length of 'center' must equal the number of columns of 'x' Ultimately I want to predict

Hi UseRs - I am new to R, and could use some help making out-of-sample predictions using a boosting model (the mboost command). The issue is complicated by the fact that I have panel data (time by country), and am estimating the model separately for each country. FYI, this is monthly data and I have 1986m1 - 2009m12 for 9 countries. To give you a flavor of what I am doing, here is a simple

Dear All, I'm confused why I'm getting NA's in the output from ave() (at the end). Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm including the data in case that is where the problem lies: > f <- factor(FAMILYID) > bodyfat <- na.omit(data.frame(loessBODYFAT, f)) > bodyfat$loessBODYFAT [1] -8.950153e-01 -9.175285e-01 3.174061e-01 -2.101260e-01 2.534174e-02

I just upgraded to Ubuntu 8.10 (i386) from 8.04. After the upgrade, I ran update.packages(.libPaths()[1]) in R to get the packages installed from source up to date too. Unfortunately, two packages could not be updated: mclust and mboost. In both cases, the error I got mentioned lf77blas. Here's the output for mboost: * Installing *source* package 'mboost' ... ** libs gcc -std=gnu99

Hi all, I am currently updating our package gamboostLSS which depends on package mboost *and* on package gamlss.dist. From mboost we use a lot of the fitting infrastructure and from gamlss.dist we obtain the relevant loss functions (aka families) used for fitting and corresponding quantile functions. Furthermore, we use the Family() function from package mboost. However, if I depend on both

I'm running R 2.10.1 with mboost 2.0 in order to build predictive models . I am performing prediction on a binomial outcome, using a linear function (glmboost). However, I am running into some confusion regarding centering. (I am not aware of an mboost-specific mailing list, so if the main R list is not the right place for this topic, please let me know.) The boost_control() function allows

Hi, I use a mboost model to predict my dependent variable on new data. I get the following warning message: In bs(mf[[i]], knots = args$knots[[i]]$knots, degree = args$degree, : some 'x' values beyond boundary knots may cause ill-conditioned bases The new predicted values are partly negative although the variable in the training data ranges from 3 to 8 on a numeric scale. In order to

I'm getting started in R, and I'm trying to use one of the gradient boosting packages, mboost. I'm already installed the package with install.packages("mboost") and loaded it with library(mboost). My problem is that when I attempt to call glmboost, I get a message that " Error in glmboost() : no applicable method for "glmboost" ". Does anybody have

Dear all, I am puzzled by R's memory usage when calling the blackboost function from package mboost to estimate a Gradient boosting model on a simulated dataset with 20 correlated variables and 100,000 obs. The blackboost object created by the function is only 15.3Mb, but R's memory usage increases by about 3.9Gb during the estimation of the model and the memory is not released even after

Dear useRs and developeRs, I am struggling with a simple but not obviously solvable issue. Suppose I have the following list of data.frames called 'tmp': a <- data.frame(a=rnorm(10),b=letters[1:10]) (tmp <- list(a,a[1:4,],a[1:7,])) It is known that all data.frames in this list have the same number of columns (and this is a good thing). I want to build a bigger data.frame

New major versions of the caret packages (caret 3.37, caretLSF 1.23 and caretNWS 0.23) have been uploaded to CRAN. caret is a package for building and evaluating a wide variety of predictive models. There are functions for pre-processing, tuning models using resampling, visualizing the results, calculating performance and estimating variable importance. caretNWS and caretLSF are two parallel

New major versions of the caret packages (caret 3.37, caretLSF 1.23 and caretNWS 0.23) have been uploaded to CRAN. caret is a package for building and evaluating a wide variety of predictive models. There are functions for pre-processing, tuning models using resampling, visualizing the results, calculating performance and estimating variable importance. caretNWS and caretLSF are two parallel

New versions of the caret (3.08) and caretLSF (1.12) packages have been released. caret (short for "Classification And REgression Training") aims to simplify the model building process. The package has functions for data splitting, pre-processing and model tuning, as well as other miscellaneous functions. In the new versions: - The elasticnet and the lasso (from the enet package)