similar to: ignore error in for-loop

Hello R-users, I am aware that this is a very basic question, but still... Since mode() function is reserved for something else, is there a function to calculate statistical mode for a vector or a matrxi? i.e. mode.function(c(1,2,2,2,3,3))=2 Thanks in advance, Elena Moltchanova Elena MOLTCHANOVA IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria E-Mail:

Hi, everybody! I am currently dealing with spatial estimation and thus writing some smoothing algorithms. My question concerns the graphical output. I would like my function to produce a picture of input data (X) and of estimation results(Y). Both, X and Y are categorical variables which can take values 1,2,...,Cl. So, basically I write foo<-function(){ ....

Dear R-Users, I want to use mtable from package "memisc" to produce Latex-style estimation output. However, mtable() only gives me a p-value and not the corresponding test-statistic. Does anyone know how to extract it, either from a glm/anova object or mtable? Here is a short example: # Run this #################### install.packages("memisc") library(memisc) set.seed(1)

Hello, everybody! I have subscribed to the list only recently, although I've been actively using R since February. I found it very useful and very flexible and I hope to learn to use it better. My current problem concerns spatial statistics. I need to partition a regular rectangular grid into given number of subsets. For example for a 5*5 grid with 3 subsets I could have: 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2

Dear R-nlme expert We need two pieces of information about the fitting of a nlme model which we cannot extract from the R help files and would be most grateful if you could help us. We fit an energy allocation growth model with 4 parameters to individual growth curves using the nlme routine. We thus have repeated age and size measurements of individuals and therefore allow for random

Hi all, Does anyone know a way to change the significant stars in mtable (package memisc)? The default is Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1, however I need it to be Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.01 '**' 0.05 '*' 0.1 ' ' 1 Kind regards, Erich [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I have a grouped data set and would like to calculate weighted proportions for a large number of factor variables within each group member. Rather than using dplyr::count() on each of these factors individually, the idea would be to do it for all factors at once. Does anyone know how this would work? Here is a reproducible example: ############################################################

Dear all, I'm trying to use "scatterplot" from package "car" to get a scatterplot with row-names as labels and I want my data to be divided into two groups defined by the column "tresh". Leaving away the groups-command gives me the right labels but they are not distinguished by colors according to "tresh". Does anybody know why the following example

i am working my way to create a stdin-stdout version of R i am not a gcc configuration expert. currently, i am missing #include <sys/types.h> # include <sys/socket.h> # include <netinet/in.h> # include <netinet/tcp.h> #include "sock.h" as far as i understand my system, these header files shpuld be in /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/2.95.1/include

To be clear: I’m concerned about the amount of our infrastructure (as well as downstream infrastructure, this would be actually pretty painful for both of my downstreams) that the community would have break/need fixing as a part of that. So I want this to happen ONCE. I think it is well motivated now, but switching from ‘default’ to ‘main’ when that becomes the ‘standard’ one seems way less

I mean, we could change it twice? There are about a hundred scripts out there for doing it. -eric On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:40 AM Keane, Erich <erich.keane at intel.com> wrote: > Do we have any ability to reach out to github (at least?) to see what they > are going to do? I’d very much like to avoid being the odd-project-out > here. > > > > > > > >

Hi all, I want to plot the grouped means of some variables. The dependent variables and the grouping factor are stored in different columns. I want to draw a simple line-plot of means, in which the x-axis represents the variables and y-axis represents the means. The means of the groups should be connected by lines. So far, the only function that I could find comes closest to what I'm

I disagree with your timing concerns. Changing is still straightforward and I'd like to see this done within 1-2 weeks. Thanks. -eric On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:22 PM Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> wrote: > +1 to waiting until git and/or github decide on a new name for the default > branch. I think there is a compelling reason to change the name of the > default

I wrote a R script say called computeCovarMatrix.R and i want to call and run this piece from Excel visual basic. does anyone know how to do that? thanks, KZ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I’d like us to move forward with something along the lines Erich proposed back in May, ideally early enough in the LLVM 8 release process that people testing the release will be able to provide feedback. Are there any remaining concerns? > On May 23, 2018, at 6:21 AM, Keane, Erich via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all- > I just wanted to bump this again,

I've heard just about zero opposition to this, so I've put a code review together here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47073 With the intent of either implementing this policy change, or encouraging further discussion/bikeshed. Thanks all! -Erich -----Original Message----- From: Brooks Davis [mailto:brooks at freebsd.org] Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 10:34 AM To: Keane, Erich <erich.keane

Sorry for the inline-comment format being weird, I haven't figured out yet how to do '>' stuff in outlook yet :/ Hopefully this is clear enough. -----Original Message----- From: mehdi.amini at apple.com [mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:55 AM To: Keane, Erich <erich.keane at intel.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re:

As I mentioned on another thread, we also use the term "slave" for the BuildBot builders. In the past, I was told this was due to being stuck on an old version of BuildBot. Fortunately, there is already work in progress to update BuildBot to a newer version. Since that's also going affect all the build machines, perhaps changing the name of the main branch should happen

That's a good point, we should definitely be respectful of the build bot owners time, that said I think it's the coordination that takes the time rather than the change :) On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:48 AM Keane, Erich via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > My understanding is the biggest concern about the name change is the > ‘cost’ associated with needing to

Alright, I guess it isn’t just my pain then, it makes it feel better ☺ I think that proposed feature would be really nice, since it would encourage people to write tests that have a //CHECK: some-thing-after-header first! From: Reid Kleckner [mailto:rnk at google.com] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 11:15 AM To: Keane, Erich <erich.keane at intel.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: