Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches similar to: "missing output in summary() and anova()"
2010 Nov 29
4
subset
?Hi:
I always use subset the same way but now is returning 0 rows.
What's wrong with the way I am subsetting?
library(ggplot2)
structure(list(first = c(38.2086, 43.1768, 43.146, 41.8044, 42.4232,
46.3646, 38.0813, 40.0745, 40.4889, 38.6246, 40.2826, 41.6056,
34.5353, 40.0768), second = c(43.3295, 42.4326, 38.8994, 37.0894,
42.3218, 46.1726, 39.1206, 41.2072, 42.4874, 40.2657, 38.7766,
2012 Nov 28
2
hhmm time format, strptime and %k
Hello,
I am having trouble with the conversion specifications as described in
the strptime help page.
> head(dat)
Date Time Open High Low Close Up Down Volume
1 11/19/2012 935 137.89 138.06 137.82 138.05 3202541 3013215 0
2 11/19/2012 940 138.04 138.40 138.02 138.38 2549660 2107595 4657255
3 11/19/2012 945 138.38 138.40 138.18 138.19 1627379 1856318 3483697
4
2010 Sep 10
2
pairwise.t.test vs t.test
Dear all, I am perplexed when trying to get the same results using pairwise.t.test and t.test.
I'm using examples in the ISwR library,
>attach(red.cell.folate)
I can get the same result for pairwise.t.test and t.test when I set the variances to be non-equal, but not when they are assumed to be equal. Can anyone explain the differences, or what I'm doing wrong?
Here's an example
1997 Aug 18
1
R-beta: bug report
The following seems to be a bug when I tried to use the predict function.
> forbes
boil.pt pressure log.pressure
[1,] 194.5 20.79 303.4472
[2,] 194.3 20.79 303.4472
[3,] 197.9 22.40 310.9061
[4,] 198.4 22.67 312.1042
[5,] 199.4 23.15 314.1995
[6,] 199.9 23.35 315.0597
[7,] 200.9 23.89 317.3460
[8,] 201.1 23.99
2012 Oct 15
1
performance analytics
hi Michael,
am sorry for the incomplete reply .
csv file data havinmg like this ,
>getSymbols("IBM")
>weekly_data = to.weekly(week_name)
>dataframe=data.frame(weekly_data)
>outputfile_name="F:\\R-programs\\Outputfile.csv"
>write.table(dataframe, file =outputfile_name,sep = ",",col.names
=TRUE,row.names = T)
> datafrom_table <-
2008 Jun 09
1
Cross-validation in R
Folks; I am having a problem with the cv.glm and would appreciate someone
shedding some light here. It seems obvious but I cannot get it. I did read
the manual, but I could not get more insight. This is a database containing
3363 records and I am trying a cross-validation to understand the process.
When using the cv.glm, code below, I get mean of perr1 of 0.2336 and SD of
0.000139. When using a
2012 Dec 10
8
home directory server performance issues
I?m looking for advice and considerations on how to optimally setup
and deploy an NFS-based home directory server. In particular: (1) how
to determine hardware requirements, and (2) how to best setup and
configure the server. We actually have a system in place, but the
performance is pretty bad---the users often experience a fair amount
of lag (1--5 seconds) when doing anything on their home
2002 Mar 25
2
Extreme value distributions (Long.)
This may not actually be an R/Splus problem, but it started
off that way .....
===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===
Executive summary:
==================
Simulations involving extreme value distributions seem to ``work''
when the underlying distribution is exponential(1) or exponential(2)
== chi-squared_2, but NOT when the underlying distribution is