similar to: How is the binding for a super assignment made visible?

The package list was accessed October 28, 10:13 am MST using Windows XP and mirror USA (CA 1). Bill Morphet, Ph.D.

When constructing an R extension, how can a hyperlink from an .Rd file to a pdf (not generated by Sweave, so not a vignette) located in the inst/doc folder be constructed? Bill Morphet ATK, Space Launch Systems Postflight Evaluation Eng [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

To install from a local zip file, install.packages option repos=NULL. Then, how can dependencies of the local zip file, which are located in the repository of contributor packages, be automatically installed? Or, is there a better way than to tell the person installing from local zip what the dependent files are, and to install them from the repository first? Bill Morphet [[alternative HTML

I am trying to duplicate the example by Spencer Graves in the wiki, using lmer with the Nozzle data. http://wiki.r-project.org/rwiki/doku.php?id=guides:lmer-tests However the Chisq value and the fitAB values that are calculated are different compared to those in the example. I also get a warning message when I attempt the fitAB. Does anyone have any guidance as to why this might happen and how

Dear Madams and Sirs, because the DOI foundation recommends a new, secure resolver [1], I wanted to suggest the attached patch. It a) updates a static DOI link in the docu, b) the code chunks that generate new ones, and c) a reg-ex that detects DOI links. Hopefully, my first venture into SVN & patch files was done correctly. My apologies, if there is anything amiss. In that case, I'll

Dear Helpers, in which way I have to use the assignment-operator evaluating left to right with R 2.0.0? With R 2.0.0 (w2k-installation) the "superassignment" operator '<<-' seems to have a different behaviour compared with R 1.9.1 : > x<<-4 > x [1] 4 > attr(x,'y')<<-5 Error: Object "x" not found > Using earlier

Dear Sir, *????????????????????????VE????(VE??????????????),?????????? ??????4JB1,??????6BT,????????????,??????????..... * ??????????????????????VE??????????, ?????????????????????? ??????????,???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????,??????????????????????????????,??????.?????? ????????????????????????????. * ????????????????????,??????????.

Dear Sir, *????????????????????????VE????(VE??????????????),?????????? ??????4JB1,??????6BT,????????????,??????????..... * ??????????????????????VE??????????, ?????????????????????? ??????????,???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????,??????????????????????????????,??????.?????? ????????????????????????????. * ????????????????????,??????????.

What is the preferred method to view a pdf (not generated by Sweave so not a vignette) in a package /doc ? Some options are openPDF(Biobase), and the README and Help files. Bill Morphet ATK, Space Launch Systems Postflight Evaluation Eng [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

>>>>> Katrin Leinweber <katrin.leinweber at uni-konstanz.de> >>>>> on Sun, 25 Mar 2018 19:04:34 +0200 writes: > Dear Madams and Sirs, > because the DOI foundation recommends a new, secure resolver [1], I > wanted to suggest the attached patch. It > a) updates a static DOI link in the docu, > b) the code chunks that

Hi ! I own a Canon S500 (4 Color Inkjet printer). Canon has ultimately poor support for linux i'll never by a Canon-product again. Unfortunately i bought this one before i abandoned my windows and now i'm stuck with some average drivers of my Fedora linux (FC5). No nozzle check/alignment, no printhead cleaning and bad color-setup/correction. I tried turboprint.de drivers and are they much

Dear Sir, *????????????????????????VE????(VE??????????????),?????????? ??????4JB1,??????6BT,????????????,??????????..... * ??????????????????????VE??????????, ?????????????????????? ??????????,???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????,??????????????????????????????,??????.?????? ????????????????????????????. * ????????????????????,??????????.

I'd like to be able to prevent the <<- assignment operator ("super assignment") from assigning to the global environment unless the variable already exists and is not locked. If it does not exist or is locked, I'd like an error to be produced. This would allow me to evaluate expressions with this temporarily set to protect against mistakes. For example, I'd like to

I think that should be the default behaviour. It's pretty late to get that into R 4.3.0, but I think your proposal (with check.superassignment = FALSE being the default) could make it in, and 4.4.0 could change the default to TRUE. Duncan On 19/03/2023 12:08 p.m., Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > I'd like to be able to prevent the <<- assignment operator ("super >

Is this expected behavior? > z <- 1:5 > z[1] <<- 0 Error in z[1] <<- 0 : object "z" not found The documentation seems to suggest that z will be found in the global environment and modified accordingly. Best, Hsiu-Khuern.

Why should it make an exception for cases where the about-to-be-assigned-to name is present in the global environment? I think it should warn or give an error if the altered variable is in any environment on the search list. -Bill On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 10:54?AM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > I think that should be the default behaviour. It's pretty late to

I have to say <<- is a core debugging tool when assigning into the global environment. I suppose I could use assign but that would be somewhat annoying. That said I'm still for this change, the vast overwhelming number of times that <<- is in my package code - already rare but it does happen - it would absolutely be a bug (typo most likely) for it to get to the global environment

Hi! we have two Intel Quad Nic 82576, PCI ID 8086:10E8 and use the igb driver 1.3.19.3 on Debian 5.0.1. I used the pciback.hide XEN kernel parameter and made on of the NIC''s interfaces available in a DomU. Now, when I am starting the VM, the system crashes (log attached) I also tried to boot with the irqpoll option - the Interrupt Disabled message still appears when I try to start the

Hi R-devels, latetely I reported having problems with understanding warnings issued by a devel version of R CMD check, which Brian Ripley in his reply https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-August/050493.html correctly attributed to my using an outdated version (July 29) --- you really have to be quick with updating these days! Having switched to a more recent version, R CMD check

Everyone, I know that this has been discussed a few times on the list, but I think that there is a high false positive rate of messages from findGlobals during R CMD check (I know the help page has that "The result is an approximation"). Here are two examples of from the caret package: This function get the message "predictors.gbm: no visible binding for global variable