similar to: manova: R vs SAS...need some clarification

Dear R-users; Previously I posted a question about the problem of rank deficiency in summary.manova. As somebody suggested, I'm attaching a small part of the data set. #*************************************************** "test" <- structure(.Data = list(structure(.Data = c(rep(1,3),rep(2,18),rep(3,10)), levels = c("1", "2", "3"), class =

Hi all, I have received the following error from summary.manova: Error in summary.manova(manova.test, test = "Pillai") : residuals have rank 36 < 64 The data is simulated data for 64 variables. The design is a 2*2 factorial with 10 replicates per treatment. Looking at the code for summary.manova, the error involves a problem with qr(). Does anyone have a suggestion as to how to

While I was helping a SAS-using friend with an analysis I noticed some differences in the multivariate test statistics, approximate F statistics, and p-values in the manova function using R and proc GLM using SAS. The univariate coefficients are identical. Is there a reason to expect R and SAS to give different results? Thanks, Bill Kristan.

Dear All, I am trying to perform MANOVA. I have table with 504 columns(species) and 36 rows) with two grouping (season and location) Zx <- Z[c(4:504)] Zxm <- as.matrix(Z) m<- manova(Zxm~Season*location, data=Z) when I do summary.aov, I get respond for each species but summary.manova summary.manova(m) :" residuals have rank" 24<501. What can it be the reason for this error

Hi, Does anyone know what the error message mean? > Boot2.Pillai <- function(x, ind) { + x <- as.matrix(x[,2:ncol(x)]) + boot.x <- as.factor(x[ind, 1]) + boot.man <- manova(x ~ boot.x) + summary(manova(boot.man))[[4]][[3]] + } > > man.res <- manova(as.matrix(pl.nosite) ~ + as.factor(plankton.new[,1]))$residuals > boot2.plank <-

Hi.? There appears to be a bug in R function manova.? My friend and I both ran it the same way as shown below (his run) with the shown data set. His results are shown below. we both got the same results.? I was running with R 2.3.1. I'm not sure what version he used. Thanks very much, David Booth Kent State University -----Original Message----- From: dvdbooth at cs.com To: kberk at

Let's say I have a within-subject experiment with 2 observables, obs1 and ob2 and 2 independent factors, fac1 and fac2. I can do summary( aov( obs1~fac1*fac2 + Error(Subject/(fac1*fac2)) ) ) summary( aov( obs2~fac1*fac2 + Error(Subject/(fac1*fac2)) ) ) to test the 2 observables separately. > summary( fit<-manova( cbind(obs1,obs2)~fac1*fac2 + Error(Subject/(fac1*fac2)) ) ) gives

Hi, I have a nested unbalanced data set of four correlated variables. When I do univariate analyses, my factor of interest is significant or marginally significant with all of the variables. Small effect size but always in the same direction. If I do a MANOVA instead (because the variables are not independent!) then my factor is far from being significant. How does that come about? I have

Hi R-users I'm trying to do multivariate analysis of variance of a experiment with 3 treatments, 2 variables and 5 replicates. The procedure adopted in SAS is as follow, but I'm having difficulty in to implement the contrasts for comparison of all treatments in R. I have already read manuals and other materials about manova in R, but nothing about specific contrasts were found in them,

Can R do a repeated measures MANOVA and tell what dimensionality the statistical variance occupies? I have been using MATLAB and SPSS to do my statistics. MATLAB can do ANOVAs and MANOVAs. When it performs a MANOVA, it returns a parameter d that estimates the dimensionality in which the means lie. It also returns a vector of p-values, where each p_n tests the null hypothesis that the mean

In summary.manova the qr decomposition of a NxN matrix is calculated and for some cases is giving me a rank < N. However, following suggestions of professor Ripley to calculate the rank of a Matrix On 7 Jun 2002, Brian Ripley wrote: > For a more reliable answer, look at the SVD > (function svd) and look at the > singular values. For example (from lda.default) X.s <-

Hi all, I wonder if this kind of questions are ok in this list... Quick question: What does it mean than the rank of the QR decomposition of a NxN matrix is N-1 ? m: NxN matrix qr(m)$rank equal to (N-1) Long version: I'm doing a manova on a matrix of 10 variables and 16 observations. > dim(tmp) [1] 16 10 > fit <- manova( tmp ~ treatment*mouse ) >results <-

Hello, Is there like the kruskal wallis test in relation to ANOVA (no restrictions on normallity and variance homogenity) something (in R) for MANOVA? thanks -- Dr.Nicolaas Busscher Universit?t GH Kassel Nordbahnhofstrasse: 1a, D-37213 Witzenhausen Phone: 0049-(0)5542-98-1715, Fax: 0049-(0)5542-98-1713

SAS proc rank has ties options of high and low that would allow producing ranks of the type found in the sports pages, e.g., rank (c(1,1,2,2,2,2,3)) == 1 1 3 3 3 3 7 Could R support these ties.methods?

I have a dataset in which I have identified a three-way interaction. Factor A has 3 levels, factor B has 4 levels, and factor C has 3 levels. I would like to produce the following: 1) A manova in which I can test the effect of factor C for each combination of factor A * factor B. I know how to do this using a series of "do" commands, but I wonder whether there is a more

Hi, I would like to conduct a MANOVA. I know that there 's the manova() funciton and the summary.manova() function to get the appropriate summary of test statistics. I just don't manage to specify my model in the manova() call. How to specify a model with multiple responses and one explanatory factor? If I type:

Hello, I had a couple questions about manova modeling in R. I have calculated a manova model, and generated a summary.manova output using both the Wilks test and Pillai test. The output is essentially the same, except that the Wilks lambda = 1 - Pillai. Is this normal? (The output from both is appended below.) My other question is about the use of MANOVA. If I have one variable which has a

I'm trying to learn to use manova(), and don't understand why none of the following work: > data(iris) > fit <- manova(~ Species, data=iris) Error in lm.fit(x, y, offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, ...) : incompatible dimensions > fit <- manova(iris[,1:4] ~ Species, data=iris) Error in model.frame(formula, rownames, variables, varnames, extras,

Dear R fans, I have got a difficult sounding problem. For fitting a linear model using continuous response and then for re-fitting the model after excluding every single variable, the following functions can be used. library(MASS) model = lm(perf ~ syct + mmin + mmax + cach + chmin + chmax, data = cpus) dropterm(model, test = "F") But I am not sure whether any similar functions is

Hi all, I am experimenting the function "manova" in R. I tried it on a few data sets, but I did not understand the result: I used "summary(manova_result)" and "summary(manova_result, test='Wilks')" and they gave a bunch of numbers... But I need the Sum-of-Squares of BETWEEN and WITHIN matrices... How do I read off from the R's manova results? Any