similar to: Extract naiveBayes details

Hi, I'm currently using the R package e1071 to train naive bayes classifiers and came across a bug: When the posterior probabilities of all classes are small, the result from the predict.naiveBayes function become NaNs. This is an issue with the treatment of the log-transformed probabilities inside the predict.naiveBayes function. Here is an example to demonstrate the problem (you might need

Hi I'm trying to use RWeka to use a NaiveBayes Classifier(the Weka version). However it crashes whenever there is a NA in the class Gender Here is the.code I have with d2 as the data frame. The first call to NB doesn't make R crash but the second call does. NB <- make_Weka_classifier("weka/classifiers/bayes/NaiveBayesSimple") d2[,64]<-d2$Gender=="M"

Hi, I have written a code in R for classifying microarray data using naive bayes, the code is given below: library(e1071) train<-read.table("Z:/Documents/train.txt",header=T); test<-read.table("Z:/Documents/test.txt",header=T); cl <- c(c(rep("ALL",10), rep("AML",10))); cl <- factor(cl) model <- NaiveBayes(train,cl);

I'm trying to fit a naive Bayes model and predict on a new data set using the functions naivebayes and predict (package = e1071). R version 2.5.1 on a Linux machine My data set looks like this. "class" is the response and k1 - k3 are the independent variables. All of them are factors. The response has 52 levels and k1 - k3 have 2-6 levels. I have about 9,300 independent variables

Hey guys, I can't get my Naive Bayes model to predict. Forgive me if its simple... I've tried about everything and can't get it to work. Reproduceable code below. Thank you, Mike -- Michael Schumacher Manager Data & Analytics - ValueClick mike.schumacher@gmail.com * Functional Example Code from UCLA:

Hallo! I would need a code for 10-fold cross validation for the classifiers Naive Bayes and svm (e1071) package. Has there already been done something like that? I tried to do it myself by applying the tune function first: library(e1071) tune.control <- tune.control(random =F, nrepeat=1, repeat.aggregate=min.,sampling=c("cross"),sampling.aggregate=mean, cross=10, best.model=T,

Dear all, I tried a simple naive Bayes classification on an artificial dataset, but I have troubles getting the predict function to work with the type="class" specification. With type= "raw", it works perfectly, but with type="class" I get following error : Error in as.vector(x, mode) : invalid 'mode' argument Data : mixture.train is a training set with 100

hi there!! i am trying to implement the code of the e1071 package for naive bayes, but it doens't really work, any ideas?? i am very glad about any help!! i need a naive bayes with 10-fold cross validation: code: library(e1071) model <- naiveBayes(code ~ ., mydata) tune.control <- tune.control(random = FALSE, nrepeat = 1, repeat.aggregate = min, sampling = c("cross"),

Hi! I'm using the Naive Bayes classifier provided by the e1071 package ( http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071) and I've noticed that the predict function has a different behavior when the level set of the columns used for prediction is different from the ones used for fitting. From inspecting the predict.naiveBayes I came to the conclusion that this is due to the conversion of

Hi all, For some odd reason when running na?ve bayes, k-NN, etc., I get slightly different results (e.g., error rates, classification probabilities) from run to run even though I am using the same random seed. Nothing else (input-wise) is changing, but my results are somewhat different from run to run. The only randomness should be in the partitioning, and I have set the seed before this

Hi, I have a small doubt regarding naive Bayes. I am able to classify the data's properly but i am just stuck up with how to get the probability values for naive bayes. In the case of SVM we have "attr" function that helps in displaying the probability values. Is there any function similar to "attr" in naive Bayes that can be used for displaying the attribute values. my

In case you don't get an answer from someone more knowledgeable: 1. I don't know. 2. But it is possible that other packages that are loaded after set.seed() fool with the RNG. 3. So I would call set.seed just before you invoke each random number generation to be safe. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking

Hi, I tried to use naivebayes in package 'e1071'. when I use following parameter, only one predictor, there is an error. > m<- naiveBayes(iris[,1], iris[,5]) > table(predict(m, iris[,1]), iris[,5]) Error in log(sapply(attribs, function(v) { : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function However, when I use two predictors, there is not error any more. > m<-

Hi This is a question regarding classification performance using different methods. So far I've tried NaiveBayes (klaR package), svm (e1071) package and randomForest (randomForest). What has puzzled me is that randomForest seems to perform far better (32% classification error) than svm and NaiveBayes, which have similar classification errors (45%, 48% respectively). A similar difference in

Hi, I run R 2.10.1 under ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) and klaR version 0.6-4. I compute a model over a 2 classes dataset (composed of 700 examples). To that aim, I use the function NaiveBayes provided in the package klaR. When I then use the prediction function : predict(my_model, new_data). I get the following warning : "In FUN(1:747[[747L]], ...) : Numerical 0 probability with

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Gary Black <gwblack001 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: (Sorry to be a bit slow responding.) You have not supplied a complete example, which would be good in this case because what you are suggesting could be a serious bug in R or a package. Serious journals require reproducibility these days. For example, JSS is very clear on this point. To your question >

Hi, I tried to use naivebayes in package 'e1071'. when I use following parameter, only one predictor, there is an error. > m <- naiveBayes(iris[,1], iris[,5]) > table(predict(m, iris[,1]), iris[,5]) Error in log(sapply(attribs, function(v) { : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function However, when I use two predictors, there is not error any more. > m <-

Hello I have a rather simple code and for some reason it produces an error message. If someone can tell me why and how to fix it, I would be very greatful. Thank you in advance. ##### create data set.seed(10) n <- 200 # number of training points n.test <- 200 # number of test points p<-2 # dimension of input space z <-

I'm developing a naive bayes in R. I have the following data and am trying to predict on returned (class). dat = data.frame(home=c(0,1,1,0,0), gender=c("M","M","F","M","F"), returned=c(0,0,1,1,0)) str(dat) dat$home <- as.factor(dat$home) dat$returned <- as.factor(dat$returned) library(e1071) m <- naiveBayes(returned ~ ., dat) m

Hello, The e1071 function naiveBayes gives an error when called by do.call, although it doesn't give any error if I call it manually. Browse[1]> trainParams at classifier function (x, ...) UseMethod("naiveBayes") <environment: namespace:e1071> Browse[1]> trained <- do.call(trainParams at classifier, paramList) Error in names(dimnames(tables[[i]])) <- c(Yname,