similar to: Error

Hello, It's several days I try to track this bug, and even cannot cook a reproducible example. Yet, it occurs consistently in a long-running task after a variable period of time. Here is an example: ... my long-running code [as I said, cannot give something simple that produces this bug in a reproducible manner] Error in match(x, table, nomatch = 0L) : formal argument

I would like to replace "\r\n" with "" in a character string, where "\r\n" exists only between < and >, how could I do that? Initial: characterString = "<XML><tag1 id=\"F\r\n2\"></t\r\nag1>\r\n<tag\r\n2></tag2></XML>" Result: characterString = "<XML><tag1

When I run R CMD check R.oo on R v2.7.0 devel (2008-03-04 r44677) on WinXP I get the following error while testing examples: Error in match(x, table, nomatch = 0) : formal argument "nomatch" matched by multiple actual arguments Calls: setMethodS3 -> setMethodS3.default -> %in% -> match Execution halted How is that even possible with: > get("%in%") function (x,

How can I use the try catch block such that if this statement fails xml <- xmlTreeParse(xmlTxt, useInternal=TRUE) then this statement is executed xml <- xmlMalFormed() ? This code does not work but assuming its somewhere along these lines: tryCatch(xml <- xmlTreeParse(xmlTxt, useInternal=TRUE), xml <- xmlMalFormed(f1)) -- View this message in context:

How do you read in a whole file while preserving end of line "\n" characters? Basically, read in a whole file as one string. Ex: <XML> <TAG> </TAG> </XML> After this file is read into a variable, it should really look like "<XML>\n<TAG>\n</TAG>\n</XML>\n" -- View this message in context:

Could someone provide a link or examples of parsing XML document in R? Few specific questions below: For instance I can retrieve specific nodes using this: node <- xpathApply(xml, "//" %+% xtag, xmlValue) 1) I want to be able to retrieve parent node for this node, how can I do this? getParentNode() does not seem to cut it. 2) How can I retrieve children nodes for a particular

I do think keeping the default behavior is desirable for backwards compatibility; my suggestion is not to change default behavior but to add an optional argument that allows a different behavior. Although this can be implemented in a user-defined function, retaining empty matches facilitates programmatic use, and seems to be something that should be available in base R. It is available, for

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bryant, Thanks for your reply. It didn't work immediately, I had to create a second context, or else it was looping between the second and first line. This seems to work: [earlydial] ; Test Early Dial exten => _.,1,Set(l_Extension=${EXTEN}) exten => _.,n,Goto(earlydial2,${l_Extension},1) [earlydial2] exten => _.,n,Goto(noMatch,1)

Suppose we have `dat` shown below and we want to find the the `y` value corresponding to the last value in `x` equal to the corresponding component of `seek` and we wish to return an output the same length as `seek` using `findInterval` to perform the search. This returns the correct result: dat <- data.frame(x = c(2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4), y = c(37, 12, 19, 30, 6, 15), seek = 1:6)

Looking at the code of function 'table' in R devel r71227, I see that the part "remove NA level if it was added only for excluded in factor(a, exclude=.)" is not quite right. In is.na(a) <- match(a0, c(exclude,NA), nomatch=0L) , I think that what is intended is a[a0 %in% c(exclude,NA)] <- NA . So, it should be is.na(a) <- match(a0, c(exclude,NA),

>>>>> Gabor Grothendieck >>>>> on Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:21:55 -0400 writes: > Suppose we have `dat` shown below and we want to find the the `y` value > corresponding to the last value in `x` equal to the corresponding component > of `seek` and we wish to return an output the same length as `seek` using > `findInterval` to perform the

Hi, Summary: I ran into some unexpected behavior in approx() and tapply() that introduced NA's in "clean" data due to (?) numerical accuracy/round off. The culprit seems to be in match() that coerces it's arguments to character, loosing precision in the process. [R development version 1.2.0, 08 Nov 2000, on Linux] Example: > r > [1] 0.6931472 0.6931472 0.6931472

Hi, Summary: I ran into some unexpected behavior in approx() and tapply() that introduced NA's in "clean" data due to (?) numerical accuracy/round off. The culprit seems to be in match() that coerces it's arguments to character, loosing precision in the process. [R development version 1.2.0, 08 Nov 2000, on Linux] Example: > r > [1] 0.6931472 0.6931472 0.6931472

hello, I need help because I don't understand the syntaxe "else" how can I write it for example I writed a script to cut missings values and I have errors > if(na==length(C)){ + pos=match(0,match(donGeno[[na-1]],donGeno[[na]],nomatch=0)) + for(k in 1:(na-1)) { + if(pos==1) {donGeno[[k]] <-

Good morning, the Icecast Project is very pleased to have released the next beta of Icecast, version 2.5 beta3. As this is a beta usage in production should be with caution. Please see the full news entry linked below for details. New features (extract): * Overall * Improved relay configuration including multi-upstream support * Improved directory configuration including updated

Good morning, the Icecast Project is very pleased to have released the next beta of Icecast, version 2.5 beta3. As this is a beta usage in production should be with caution. Please see the full news entry linked below for details. New features (extract): * Overall * Improved relay configuration including multi-upstream support * Improved directory configuration including updated

Here is some data (dput output below) > myData id group 1 D599 A 2 002-0004 B 3 F01932 A 18 F16 B 19

Hello, is there any plan for a binary (windows systems) release for the beta 3 or shall I wait for the public release out of beta stage? Thank you Best regards Il giorno lun 14 mar 2022 alle ore 11:59 Philipp Schafft < phschafft at de.loewenfelsen.net> ha scritto: > Good morning, > > the Icecast Project is very pleased to have released the next beta > of Icecast, version 2.5

Hello, is there any plan for a binary (windows systems) release for the beta 3 or shall I wait for the public release out of beta stage? Thank you Best regards Il giorno lun 14 mar 2022 alle ore 11:59 Philipp Schafft < phschafft at de.loewenfelsen.net> ha scritto: > Good morning, > > the Icecast Project is very pleased to have released the next beta > of Icecast, version 2.5

Hello, I was playing around with the newly implemented 'incomparables' argument in 'match' and realized the argument does not behave anything like I expected. Can someone explain what is going on here? Sorry if I'm misreading the documentation. > match(1:3, 1:3, incomparables=1) [1] NA 2 3 # This seems right, the 1 in 'x' is 'incomparable' >