similar to: Comparing two groups of proportions

When rsync'ing to a module with rsync -a I have a file appear with the proper owner, but not the proper group set. Below is the module, is it functionally possible to hard set the group like the user while still using the -a flag with rsync. max connections = 25 timeout = 600 secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets lock file = /var/tmp/rsyncd.lock list = yes [release] comment = Release

Hi Charles, On Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:40:09 PM Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jul 12, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Ivan Adzhubey <iadzhubey at rics.bwh.harvard.edu> > wrote: > > I have recently installed NUT 2.7.3.1 on a freshly installed Ubuntu 16.04 > > LTS (64-bit) system, connected via USB cable to APC Smart-UPS 1500 (SMT > > model). I am trying to make this configuration

Hi, I have recently installed NUT 2.7.3.1 on a freshly installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (64-bit) system, connected via USB cable to APC Smart-UPS 1500 (SMT model). I am trying to make this configuration work for automatic shutdown/restart but it seems that it completely ignores /etc/killpower presence. I know the APC SMT models are problematic but it looks like I could not even make the simplest

Hello, sorry for incomplete code... with this I read the file and calculate my stuff. I have a plenty of them 80-300K every 5 Kelvin. I start with 79K, 80K...300K test<-read.table("T300_both.txt",header=FALSE,sep="") RH2<-c(RH2,2.5e7*.32e-4/100e-6/5100*(test$V3[c(2)]-test$V3[c(1)]+test $V3[c(4)]-test$V3[c(3)])) n2<-c(n2,-1/(RH2[c(46)]*1.60217e-19))

Hi, I am trying to build R 2.2.1 with Kazushige Goto's BLAS library (libgoto) and encountered a problem: I have two computers with the almost identical hardware (P4 Northwood CPU, i875 chipset, 2GB DDR400 RAM) and identical Linux OS. I have the latest version of libgoto for this CPU installed on both boxes (libgoto_northwood32p-r1.00.so) and I am using gcc compiler flags "-O2

Hi, I have recently purchased MGE ellipse 1200 UPS for my home system. Obviously, the choice of this particular brand was mainly dictated by MGE's long-standing support for Linux and NUT project. The fact that the box was clearly the prettiest looking one on the block did help also ;-). I have had NUT tools installed and configured in no time, as I did it numerous times before -- kudos

So, I have been running into network problems for a while on 4 boxes that I installed xen on so that some engineers have places to test code. This particular problem is happening on all 4 of these boxes. (although, it isn''t happening on an older box running xen from debian etch). What appears to be the problem is that traffic is getting dropped between the vif#.0 interface in dom0

[please use Reply-All to include the list. thanks!] On Jul 12, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Ivan Adzhubey <iadzhubey at rics.bwh.harvard.edu> wrote: > > I have recently installed NUT 2.7.3.1 on a freshly installed Ubuntu 16.04 LTS > (64-bit) system, connected via USB cable to APC Smart-UPS 1500 (SMT model). I > am trying to make this configuration work for automatic shutdown/restart but

On Jul 15, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Ivan Adzhubey <iadzhubey at rics.bwh.harvard.edu> wrote: > > Anyway, now that even Debian announced dropping support for sysvinit > compatibility we will have to learn how to live with systemd, like it or not. [grumble; systemd rant deleted] > After that, NUT server would correctly process power loss events (both real > and simulated) by

On Friday, July 15, 2016 11:25:30 PM EDT Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jul 15, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Ivan Adzhubey <iadzhubey at rics.bwh.harvard.edu> > wrote: > > After that, NUT server would correctly process power loss events (both > > real and simulated) by cutting UPS power after a system shutdown and > > restarting it after a short delay when/if the power is back. >

Hello, I wanted to know if there is a simple way of getting the inverse cdf for a KDE estimate of a density (using the ks or KernSmooth packages) in R ? The method I'm using now is to perform a numerical integration of the pdf to get the cdf and then doing a search for the desired probablity value, which is highly inefficient and very slow. Thanks, -fj [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

this is not a problem with R but a request for related advice. i am trying to run a lengthy batch job from my home. the OS is ... Linux jedi.bwh.harvard.edu 2.4.22-openmosix1smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 5 01:05:37 CEST 2003 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux i start the job and put it in the background. while i am connected, all is well. eventually my ISP shuts down the connection if i do not do any input.

1. You neglected to cc r-help! 2. Word files are **not** text files. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Jay Zola <jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl> wrote: > Dear sir, > > >

Hi all, I've been searching the lists and web for an answer but i'm stumped hope some one here has an answer for me. As I'm new to this sysadmin role. I have set up OpenLDAP to authenticate our linux users and exim MTAs. This all works fine with OpenLDAP only providing a ldaps:/// connection on 636. However I cannot for the life of me get samba to speak tls to it. I've seen

Hi, I initially posted this to the general R mailing list, but Bert Gunter thought this may be a mixed model issue, so suggested me to post here. I have a dataset that has 2 groups of subjects. For each subject in each group, the response measured is the number of success (no.success) obatined with the number of trials (no.trials). So a probability of success (prop.success) can be computed as

Hi everyone, I am trying to compare proportions among groups using the logistic regression approach as follows: 1) Fit the model log(p_i/(1-p_i)) = M + G_i, where p_i is the probability of success in group i and G_i is the effect of group i, i=1,..,I. 2) Test the hypotheses: Ho: G_1 = G_2 = ... = G_I (the probability of success is the same for all groups) versus Ha: at least two

Hello there, I have two groups (men and women) and I know per group how many of them smoke or don't smoke (women 40 of 200; men 100 of 300). I would like to know how I can compare in R if men and women differ significantly in their smoking. However, because there are more men in the sample than women I cannot just compare the number of smokers and non-smokers in both groups, right?! (I would

Dear R users, Is it possible to use a generalized linear model to do a binomial comparison of one list of proportions with a matched list of proportions to test for a difference? So, for example: list 1 list 2 a1 | b1 a2 | b2 3 | 4 7 | 9 6 | 7 5 | 1 9 | 1 3 | 1 I want to compare list 1 with list 2 and the samples

Probably the wrong list. R-help is concerned with R programming, not statistics methodology questions, although the intersection can be nonempty. I suggest you post on stats.stackexchange.com instead, which *is* concerned with statistics methodology questions. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into

This question is slightly off topic, but I'll use R to try and make it as relevant as possible. I'm working on a problem where I want to compare estimates from a posterior distribution with a uniform prior with those obtained from a frequentist approach. Under these conditions the estimates should agree. Specifically, I am asking the question, "What is the probability that the true