similar to: Multivariate LM: calculating F-values after calling linear.hypothesis

I have design with two repeated-measures factor, and no grouping factor. I can analyze the dataset successfully in other software, including my legacy DOS version BMDP, and R's 'aov' function. I would like to use 'Anova' in 'car' in order to obtain the sphericity tests and the H-F corrected p-values. I do not believe the data are truly deficient in rank. I

Dear all, I am fitting a multivariate linear model with 7 response variables and 1 explanatory variable. The following matrix P: P <- cbind( c(1,-1,0,0,0,0,0), c(2,2,2,2,2,-5,-5), c(1,0,0,-1,0,0,0), c(-2,-2,0,-2,2,2,2), c(-2,1,0,1,0,0,0), c(0,-1,0,1,0,0,0)) should consist of orthogonal elements (as can be shown using %*% on the individual columns). However, when I use

I'm trying to determine the lack of fit for regression on the following: data <- data.frame(ref=c(0,50,100,0,50,100), actual=c(.01,50.9,100.2,.02,49.9,100.1), level=gl(3,1)) fit <- lm(actual~ref,data) fit.aov <- aov(actual~ref+Error(level),data) According to the information I have, the lack of fit for this regression is the

Hi, I am doing canonical discriminant analysis using candisc function from the candisc package. My input is a table of species distribution (columns = abundance of each species in each sample) in samples that are split by categories (rows), and I want to know whether each category is associated with a particular set of species and their abundances. I have 20 rows (samples) split into 6

Hi, I have encountered this error when attempting a One-way Repeated-measure ANOVA with my data. I have read the "Anova in car: SSPE apparently deficient rank" thread by I'm not sure the within-subject interaction has more degrees of freedom than subjects in my case. I have prepared the following testing script: rm(list = ls())

Hello all, I am getting the following error: Error in linear.hypothesis.mlm(mod, hyp.matrix.1, SSPE = SSPE, V = V, : The error SSP matrix is apparently of deficient rank = 7 < 11 After running: mod.ok <- lm(as.matrix(dat[,-1]) ~ DC, data=dat) (av.ok <- Anova(mod.ok, idata=idata, idesign=~week)) Although if I jitter the data in "dat", the function seems to work. What

Dear R fans, I have got a difficult sounding problem. For fitting a linear model using continuous response and then for re-fitting the model after excluding every single variable, the following functions can be used. library(MASS) model = lm(perf ~ syct + mmin + mmax + cach + chmin + chmax, data = cpus) dropterm(model, test = "F") But I am not sure whether any similar functions is

Hi there, Does anyone know how to extract elements from the table returned by Manova()? Using the univariate equivalent, Anova(), it's easy: a.an<-Anova(lm(y~x1*x2)) a.an$F This will return a vector of the F-values in order of the terms of the model. However, a similar application using Manova(): m.an<-Manova(lm(Y~x1~x2)) m.an$F Returns NULL. So does any attempt at calling the

Dear all, is there anyone who can help me extracting p-values from an Anova object from the car library? I can't seem to locate the p-values using str(result) or str(summary(result)) in the example below > A <- factor( rep(1:2,each=3) ) > B <- factor( rep(1:3,times=2) ) > idata <- data.frame(A,B) > fit <- lm( cbind(a1_b1,a1_b2,a1_b3,a2_b1,a2_b2,a2_b3) ? sex,

Thank you for reading. I am trying to get sphericity values, and I understood I need to use mlm, but how do I implement a nested within subject design in mlm? I already read the R newsletter, fox chapter appendix, EZanova, and whatever I could find online. My original ANOVA anova(aov(resp ~ sucrose*citral, random =~1 | subject, data = p12bl, subset = exps==1)) Or anova(aov(resp ~