similar to: Smooth Spline

Folks, I have the following dataframe: > x <- structure(list(name = c("EU B", "EU B", "EU B", "EU B", "EU B", "EU B", "AU A", "AU A", "AU A", "AU A", "AU A", "AU A"), date = c("2010-10-11", "2010-10-12", "2010-10-13",

Dear R-listers Is there anyone who knows why I get different eigenvectors when I run MatLab and R? I run both programs in Windows Me. Can I make R to produce the same vectors as MatLab? #R Matrix PA9900<-c(11/24 ,10/53 ,0/1 ,0/1 ,29/43 ,1/24 ,27/53 ,0/1 ,0/1 ,13/43 ,14/24 ,178/53 ,146/244 ,17/23 ,15/43 ,2/24 ,4/53 ,0/1 ,2/23 ,2/43 ,4/24 ,58/53 ,26/244 ,0/1 ,5/43) #R-syntax

Hi, Newbie question about the pls package. Setup: Mac OS 10.3.9 R: Aqua GUI 1.01, v 2.0.1 I want to get R^2 and Q^2 (LOO and Leave-10-Out) values for each component for my model. I was running into a few problems so I played with the example a little and the results do not match up with the comments in the help pages. $ library(pls) $ data(NIR) $ testing.plsNOCV <- plsr(y ~ X, 6, data =

Hi all and thanks for your time in advance, I can't figure out why summary.lmrob complains when lmrob is used on a zooreg object. If the zooreg object is converted to vector before calling lmrob, no problems appear. Let me clarify this with an example: >library(robustbase) >library(zoo) >dad<-c(801.4625,527.2062,545.2250,608.2313,633.8875,575.9500,797.0500,706.4188,

Hi, Can anybody tell me what the message below means and how to overcome it. Thanks, Neil Warning message: X matrix deemed to be singular; variable 2 in: coxph(Surv(age_at_death, death) ~ project$pluralgp + project$yrborn + ......... >

Dear people of the help list I am drying to analyze my data using the 'lmer' function and I keep having problems. This is the model: > fm1<-lmer(dbh~spec+scheme+(1|Plot),data=d, REML=FALSE). I analyse tree size (dbh) of 3 different species (spec) and 3 planting schemes (scheme). I have 5 plots, which I hope to model as a random factor. (However, the subsequent output is based on

Hi all, I have a package that is specific to a task I was repetitively using a few years ago. I now needed to run it again with new data. However I am told it was built with an older version or R and will not work. How can I tweak the package so it will run on 11.1? It was a one-off product and has not been maintained. Is there a way to "unpackage" it and repackage it to work? I

Greetings. I'm trying to recreate in R some regression models I've done in SAS, but I'm not getting the same results. My advisor suspects this may be due to differences in precision between R and SAS. Does anyone know where I can find specifications for R's type double? (It doesn't seem to be in the R Language Definition.) Thanks in advance for any help anyone can

require(randomForest) rf.pred<-predict(fit, valid, type="prob") > rf.pred[1:20, ] 0 1 16 0.0000 1.0000 23 0.3158 0.6842 43 0.3030 0.6970 52 0.0886 0.9114 55 0.1216 0.8784 75 0.0920 0.9080 82 0.4332 0.5668 120 0.2302 0.7698 128 0.1336 0.8664 147 0.4272 0.5728 148 0.0490 0.9510 153 0.0556 0.9444 161 0.0760 0.9240 162 0.4564 0.5436 172 0.5148 0.4852 176 0.1730

Hi, When I include a categorical variable (RACE with 3 levels - "white", "black" and "other") in my logistic regression model, the correlation matrix of the coefficients gets messed up. I get something like: ----------------------------------------- Correlation of Coefficients: ( A L RACEb AGE , 1 LWT , 1 RACEblack 1

Hi, I would like to fit parametric survival models to time-to-event data that are left truncated. I have checked the help page for survreg and looked in the R-help archive, and it appears that the R function survreg from the survival library (version 2.16) should allow me to take account of left truncation. However, when I try the command

Hi List, I have spent more than 30 minutes, but failed to read in this file using the read.table() function. I could not figure out how to fix the following error. Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, : line 1 did not have 6 elements Any help would be be appreciated. Thanks, Pradip Muhuri ####### below is the reproducible example xd1 <-

All, How come both of these are the same. Both say "1-sample proportions test without continuity correction." I would suspect one would say "without" and one would say "with." > prop.test(118,236,.5,correct=FALSE,conf.level=0.95) 1-sample proportions test without continuity correction data: 118 out of 236, null probability 0.5 X-squared = 0, df = 1,

Sorry for the long letter! I have recently started using R. For the start I have tried to repeat examples from Milliken & Johnson "Analysis of Messy Data - Analysis of Covariance", but I can not replicate it in R. The example is chocolate chip experiment. Response variable vas time to dissolve chocolate chip in seconds (time), covariate was time to dissolve butterscotch chip

Hi there, I am really new to statistics in R and statistics itself as well. My situation: I ran a lot of OLS regressions with different independent variables. (using the lm() function). After having done that, I know there is endogeneity due to omitted variables. (or perhaps due to any other reasons). And here comes the Hausman test. I know this test is used to identify endogeneity. But what I

R Help - I'm trying to run a correlation matrix with a covariate of "age" and will at some point will also want to covary other variables concurrently. I'm using the "psych" package and have tried other methods such as writing a loop to extract semi-partial correlations, but it does not seem to be working. How can I accomplish this? library(psych) > set.cor(y =

Hello, I am trying to get a linear model of y ~ log(x). *> lm (y~log(x))* However, I always get an error report: /Error in model.frame.default(formula = y ~ log(x), drop.unused.levels = TRUE) : variable lengths differ (found for 'log(x)')/ *Here was my y:* > y [1] 0.4500000 0.0500000 0.5000000 0.4000000 0.0000000 0.5000000 0.4000000 [8] 0.0500000

(The list appears to have eaten my previous attempt to send this. Apologies if you receive multiple copies.) The attached patches allow you to use paravirtualised network and block interfaces from fully virtualised domains, based on Intel''s patches from a few months ago. These are significantly faster than the equivalent ioemu devices, sometimes by more than an order of magnitude.