similar to: Running regression (lm, lrm) 100+ times and saving the results as matrix

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Running regression (lm, lrm) 100+ times and saving the results as matrix"

2008 May 02
4
to extract particular date/data
Hi R-expert, If I have this daily rainfall data, how do call a particular day? Year,Month,Day,Amount 1900,12,22,1.3 1900,12,23,0 1900,12,24,0 1900,12,25,0 1900,12,26,0 1900,12,27,0 1900,12,28,0 1900,12,29,4.8 1900,12,30,0.3 1900,12,31,0.5 1901,1,1,0 1901,1,2,3 1901,1,3,0 1901,1,4,0.5 1901,1,5,0 1901,1,6,0 ... I used to use julian.date in S-Plus. Thank you so much for your kind attention and help.
2007 Aug 30
5
Single plot multiple levels in x?
Plotting with 2 x axis? One axis inside another, for example salary within state, 1-50 | 50 ? 100 | 100+ | 1- 50 | 50 -100 | 100+ | ? repeated bins for salary AL ! AR ?? more states The values are all stored with a single data frame. I have tried different things with the axis function and done many
2005 Jul 12
1
Design: predict.lrm does not recognise lrm.fit object
Hello I'm using logistic regression from the Design library (lrm), then fastbw to undertake a backward selection and create a reduced model, before trying to make predictions against an independent set of data using predict.lrm with the reduced model. I wouldn't normally use this method, but I'm contrasting the results with an AIC/MMI approach. The script contains: # Determine full
2013 Apr 30
2
R Function to extract columnNames
Hi, May be this helps: funcName<- function(df1, x){ ?whatCol=df1[[x]] ?print("Got it") ?print(whatCol) ?} ? funcName(df,"ColA") #[1] "Got it" #[1] 1 2 3 4 5 ? funcName(df,"ColB") #[1] "Got it" #[1] A B C D E #Levels: A B C D E A.K. >I am trying to extract the 2nd column from a dataframe using a function called funcName. Note this is an
2017 Sep 14
0
Help understanding why glm and lrm.fit runs with my data, but lrm does not
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:30 AM, Bonnett, Laura <L.J.Bonnett at liverpool.ac.uk> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am using the publically available GustoW dataset. The exact version I am using is available here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4oZ2TQA0PAoUm85UzBFNjZ0Ulk > > I would like to produce a nomogram for 5 covariates - AGE, HYP, KILLIP, HRT and ANT. I have
2004 Mar 22
2
Handling of NAs in functions lrm and robcov
Hi R-helpers I have a dataframe DF (lets say with the variables, y, x1, x2, x3, ..., clust) containing relatively many NAs. When I fit an ordinal regression model with the function lrm from the Design library: model.lrm <- lrm(y ~ x1 + x2, data=DF, x=TRUE, y=TRUE) it will by default delete missing values in the variables y, x1, x2. Based on model.lrm, I want to apply the robust covariance
2005 Aug 12
0
HowTo derive a correct likelihood-ratio chi-squared statistic from lrm() with a rsc() ?
Dear R helpers, >From the lrm( ) model used for binary logistic regression, we used the L.R. model value (or the G2 value, likelihood-ratio chi-squared statistic) to evaluate the goodness-of-fit of the models. The model with the lowest G2 value consequently, has the best performance and the highest accuracy. However our model includes rsc() functions to account for non-linearity. We
2017 Nov 22
6
assign NA to rows by test on multiple columns of a data frame
Given this data frame (a simplified, essential reproducible example) A<-c(8,7,10,1,5) A_flag<-c(10,0,1,0,2) B<-c(5,6,2,1,0) B_flag<-c(12,9,0,5,0) mydf<-data.frame(A, A_flag, B, B_flag) # this is my initial df mydf I want to get to this final situation i<-which(mydf$A_flag==0) mydf$A[i]<-NA ii<-which(mydf$B_flag==0) mydf$B[ii]<-NA
2017 Sep 14
1
Help understanding why glm and lrm.fit runs with my data, but lrm does not
Fixed 'maxiter' in the help file. Thanks. Please give the original source of that dataset. That dataset is a tiny sample of GUSTO-I and not large enough to fit this model very reliably. A nomogram using the full dataset (not publicly available to my knowledge) is already available in http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/tmp/bbr.pdf Use lrm, not lrm.fit for this. Adding maxit=20 will
2006 Nov 14
1
Using lrm
Hi, I have to build a logistic regression model on a data set that I have. I have three input variables (x1, x2, x3) and one output variable (y). The syntax of lrm function looks like this lrm(formula, data, subset, na.action=na.delete, method="lrm.fit", model=FALSE, x=FALSE, y=FALSE, linear.predictors=TRUE, se.fit=FALSE, penalty=0, penalty.matrix, tol=1e-7,
2008 Mar 03
1
using 'lrm' for logistic regression
Hi R, I am getting this error while trying to use 'lrm' function with nine independent variables: > res = lrm(y1994~WC08301+WC08376+WC08316+WC08311+WC01001+WC08221+WC08106+WC0810 1+WC08231,data=y) singular information matrix in lrm.fit (rank= 8 ). Offending variable(s): WC08101 WC08221 Error in j:(j + params[i] - 1) : NA/NaN argument Now, if I take choose only four
2012 May 27
2
Unable to fit model using “lrm.fit”
Hi, I am running a logistic regression model using lrm library and I get the following error when I run the command: mod1 <- lrm(death ~ factor(score), x=T, y=T, data = env1) Unable to fit model using ?lrm.fit? where score is a numeric variable from 0 to 6. LRM executes fine for the following commands: mod1 <- lrm(death ~ score, x=T, y=T, data = env1) mod1<- lrm(death ~
2009 Jan 20
5
Problem with subset() function?
Hi all, Can anyone explain why the following use of the subset() function produces a different outcome than the use of the "[" extractor? The subset() function as used in density(subset(mydf, ht >= 150.0 & wt <= 150.0, select = c(age))) appears to me from documentation to be equivalent to density(mydf[mydf$ht >= 150.0 & mydf$wt <= 150.0, "age"])
2006 Oct 02
1
a question regarding 'lrm'
Hi List, I don't understand why 'lrm' doesn't recognize the '~.' formula. I'm pretty sure it was working before. Please see below: I'm using R2.3.0, WinXP, Design 2.0-12 thanks, ...Tao > dat <- data.frame(y=factor(rep(1:2,each=50)), x1=rnorm(100), x2=rnorm(100), x3=rnorm(100)) > lrm(y~., data=dat, x=T, y=T) Error in terms.formula(formula, specials =
2009 Aug 21
1
Repost - Possible bug with lrm.fit in Design Library
Hi, I've come across a strange error when using the lrm.fit function and the subsequent predict function. The model is created very quickly and can be verified by printing it on the console. Everything looks good. (In fact, the performance measures are rather nice.) Then, I want to use the model to predict some values. I get the following error: "fit was not created by a Design
2011 May 19
1
Creating a "shifted" month (one that starts not on the first of each month but on another date)
Hello! I have a data frame with dates. I need to create a new "month" that starts on the 20th of each month - because I'll need to aggregate my data later by that "shifted" month. I wrote the code below and it works. However, I was wondering if there is some ready-made function in some package - that makes it easier/more elegant? Thanks a lot! # Example data:
2005 Dec 08
3
Reshaping data
Dear all, given I have data in a data.frame which indicate the number of people in a specific year at a specific age: n <- 10 mydf <- data.frame(yr=sample(1:10, size=n, replace=FALSE), age=sample(1:12, size=n, replace=FALSE), no=sample(1:10, size=n, replace=FALSE)) Now I would like to make a matrix with (in this simple example) 10 columns (for the
2009 Aug 21
1
Possible bug with lrm.fit in Design Library
Hi, I've come across a strange error when using the lrm.fit function and the subsequent predict function. The model is created very quickly and can be verified by printing it on the console. Everything looks good. (In fact, the performance measures are rather nice.) Then, I want to use the model to predict some values. I get the following error: "fit was not created by a Design
2010 Apr 26
1
logical(0) response from lrm
What causes the error report: logical(0) to arise in the rms function lrm? Here's my data: But both the dependent and the independent variable seem fine... > str(AABB) 'data.frame': 1176425 obs. of 9 variables: $ sex : int 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ... $ faint : int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... Here's the simplified model and error AABB$model1 < lrm (faint ~ sex)
2005 Feb 03
2
Surprising Behavior of 'tapply'
Dear all, I wanted to make a two-way-table of two variables with a counting variable stored in another column of a dataframe. In version 1.9.1, the behavior is as expected as shown in the simplified example code. > sex <- rep(c("F", "M"), 5) > income <- c(rep("low", 5), rep("high", 5)) > count <- 1:10 > mydf <-