similar to: Attempting to sync x-axis labels with grid lines in lattice bwplot

Dear all, After having set par(mfrow = c(2, 2)) and switching between plot() and xyplot() using R 2.0.0 Patched (2004-10-13) under Windows 2000, the lattice plot gets overplotted. I also tried this under 1.9.1 Patched (2004-09-22), since this is the only older version I've got installed, and it did the same thing apart from that the overplotting now starts in the opposite lower corner.

When I create a dotplot in lattice, I frequently observe overplotting of the labels along the vertical axis. On my screen, this illustrates overplotting of the letters: windows() reps=6 dat=data.frame(let=rep(letters,each=reps), grp=rep(1:reps, 26), y=runif(26*reps)) dotplot(let~y|grp, dat) Is there a way to automatically scale the labels so that they are not over-plotted? I currently do

Hi, I am trying to add text to the bottom of a lattice bwplot with multiple panels. I would like to add a label below each boxplot, but the labels do not come from the data. I've tried the following, code: f1 <- c(rep(c(rep("a", 3), rep("b", 3), rep("c", 3)), 2)) f2 <- c(rep("A", 9), rep("B", 9)) dv <- c(0.9, 0.8, 0.85, 0.6, 0.65,

I made the windows port, the first example compiled and executed correctly. I am sending a patch so you can test it if i didn't break linux compatibility. Otherwise, I will look into deja-gnu testing, perhaps can compile it on windows. I will also add other beckend in the future (Sparc, PowerPC). I hope windows using Visual C++ will be soon officially supported :) About the problem I had

I would like to query an existing plot to learn the actual x and y limits of the plottable area. Is this possible? I can discover the extreme tick mark locations but not the actual plot area limits. Setting the limits with ylim will not help in this case because I am overplotting an existing plot with a separate function, and I don't want my end-user to have to pass parameters around.

Dear R Users, I am trying to plot a barchart with a line graph superimposed (using par(new=TRUE)). There are 12 bars and 12 corresponding points for the line graph. This is fine, except that I'm encountering two problems: 1) The position of the points (of the line graph) are not centred on the middle (horizontally) of each corresponding bar. In fact, whilst the first point is located on the

Hi all, Some non trivial legalization of operations which aren't supported by the backend would benefit from having the optimizer pass on them. I noticed some example trying to optimize various pieces of code over the past weeks. One offender is the cttz/ctlz intrinsic when defined on 0. On X86, BSR and NSF are undefined on 0, and only recent CPU have the LZCNT and TZCNT instructions that

Dear List, I'm trying to draw vector in XYZ with rgl under use of a cylinder3d. Therefore I scale and rotate a basis-cylinder). However, somehow the rotation is wrong as verified by overplotting arrow3d(). Where is my mistake? library(heplots) library(rgl) # ... 2 vectors data=data.frame(row.names=c('X','Y','Z'), x1=c(2,1,5),y=c(4,3,2))

These instructions are prefix selected flavors of bsf and bsr respectively, and hence the presences of the F3 prefix must be handled in the emulation code in order to avoid running into problems on newer CPUs. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c @@ -1058,6 +1058,9 @@ static bool_t vcpu_has(

Dear all, As you can see from the attachment I'm using R to automatically annotate peptide fragmentation mass spectra, which are represented by impulse plots. I'd like to poll you on approaches of how to deal as generally as possible with the two biggest annotation issues I run into: 1) very close annotated masses (impulses) with similar y-axis dimensions - resulting in overlapping labels

I may be wrong here, but legalizing early seems like something that is more likely to prevent optimizations than it is to encourage them. But I guess I don't follow why things like TTI, TII and TLI queries don't suffice for this. CodeGenPrepare will break this sequence up. I would imagine that if the target returns false for isCheapToSpeculateCtlz() and false for canInsertSelect(), the

Hi, I have a qplot like the one in the minimal example below, except I also have faceting like this: qplot(jitter(Goodall),jitter(Better.adapt),colour=Second.adapt,facets=~Pol,data=d1) and with the real data I get quite a lot of overplotting, so I would like to add an alpha channel. In addition, I would like to be able to control which colors are used for each value of Second.adapt (which

Moving from S-plus to R I encountered many great features and a much more stable system. Currently, I am left with 2 problems that are handled differently: 1) I did lots of "overplots" in S-Plus using par(new=T,xaxs='d',yaxs='d') to fix the axes ->What is the workaround in R ? 2) In S-Plus I could fix "scientific notation" or "normal notation" in

Hello, I am trying to use "bwplot" to display whisker boxes according to some conditioning factors ("age" has two values 1/2). I get the following messages: > library(trellis) > bwplot(dvk95~age|site*season,panel=function(x,y){panel.bwplot(x,y)}) Error in tapply(1:0, structure(list(INDICES = numeric(0)), .Names = "INDICES"), : arguments must have

I want to turn off selected axes in bwplot. I would like to only have the bottom axis drawn, with the others off. I have a series of bwplots that I want on one device, like this: p1<-bwplot(x1,box.ratio=.1) p2<-bwplot(x2,box.ratio=.1) ... print(p1,position=c(0,.8,1,1),more=T) print(p2,position=c(0,.6,1,.8),more=T) ... I know about the panel functions panel.bwplot() and panel.axis(), but

Hi, I have 2 questions about bwplot in R : 1) How to change the order of my different boxes in the graph ? 2) How to rename the names of the differents boxes ? because I know how to do that with boxplot (using names) but I do not find the equivalent parameter in bwplot. thanks, C?dric

Dear list: I'm using bwplot to compare concentrations by location and treatment as in: # using built in data bwplot( conc ~ Type : Treatment, data = CO2 ) I would like the order of the plots to be: 3,4,1,2. I can't seem to figure this out with index.cond or permc.cond. Any help is appreciated! Brad Eck [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I am working with R 1.81. When I call bwplot() it prints the output to the windows device as it should. For example, d<-data.frame(y=c(2,3,4,5,12,14,16,11),x=c(rep("group1",4),rep("group2",4))) bwplot(y~x,data=d) This code results in a parallel boxplot. That is a single plot with 2 boxplots next to each other; a boxplot for "group1" and a boxplot

Hi, I'm trying to produce colored boxplots using lattice::bwplot function. I need to plot each boxplot in the panel with a specific color. Naturally I used a vector of colors and expected to see colored boxplots. Although the boxplots were colored, the color of whiskers and the boxes do not match. Here is an example: d = data.frame(y = rnorm(100), x=1:4) box.color <-

Hi, I'm trying to produce colored boxplots using lattice::bwplot function. I need to plot each boxplot in the panel with a specific color. Naturally I used a vector of colors and expected to see colored boxplots. Although the boxplots were colored, the color of whiskers and the boxes do not match. Here is an example: d = data.frame(y = rnorm(100), x=1:4) box.color <-