similar to: glm(quasipoisson) with non-integer response

Dear R users, I am having problems trying to fit quasipoisson and negative binomials glm. My data set contains abundance (counts) of a species under different management regimens. First, I tried to fit a poisson glm: > summary(model.p<-glm(abund~mgmtcat,poisson)) Call: glm(formula = abund ~ mgmtcat, family = poisson) . . . (Dispersion parameter

R 2.7 Windows XP I have two model that have been run using exactly the same data, both fit using glm(). One model is a linear regression (gaussian(link = "identity")) the other a quasipoisson(link = "log"). I have log likelihoods from each model. Is there any way I can determine which model is a better fit to the data? anova() does not appear to work as the models have the

Hi, I would like to obtain the dispersion parameter for a quasipoisson model for later use in calculating QAIC values for model comparison.Can anyone suggest a method of how to go about doing this? The idea I have now is that I could use the residual deviance divided by the residual degrees of freedom to obtain the dispersion parameter. The residual deviance is available in the summary

Hello R-help, According to a research article that covers the topic I'm analyzing, in Stata, a Poisson pseudo-maximum-likelihood (PPML) estimation can be obtained with the command poisson depvar_ij ln(indepvar1_ij) ln(indepvar2_ij) ... ln(indepvarN_ij), robust I looked up Stata help for the command, to understand syntax and such: www.stata.com/help.cgi?poisson Which simply says

Dear all, I have a quasipoisson glm for which I need confidence bands in a graphic: gm6 <- glm(num_leaves ~ b_dist_min_new, family = quasipoisson, data = beva) summary(gm6) library('VIM') b_dist_min_new <- as.numeric(prepare(beva$dist_min, scaling="classical", transformation="logarithm")). My first steps for the solution are following: range(b_dist_min_new)

Dear all, I am analyzing counts of seabirds made from line transects at sea. I have been fitting Poisson and negative binomial distributions to the data using the goodfit function from the vcd library. I would also like to evaluate how well a quasi-poisson distribution fits the data. However, none of the potentially suitable functions I have identified (goodfit(vcd), fitdistr(MASS),

Dear list, I have recently encountered an odd error when running glm(dep~indep, quasipoisson): while, with a subset of my data, I could get a perfectly reasonable model, once I include all of my data (17K+ observations, 29 variables), I get the following error: Error in if (any(y < 0)) stop("negative values not allowed for the quasiPoisson family") : missing value where

hi I'm puzzled as to the relation between the REML score computed by gam and the formula (4) on p.4 here: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/22707/1/Wood_JRSSB_2011_73_1_3.pdf I'm ok with this for poisson, or for quasipoisson when phi=1. However, when phi differs from 1, I'm stuck. #simulate some data library(mgcv) set.seed(1) x1<-runif(500) x2<-rnorm(500)

Dear all, I am trying to use the GEE methodology to fit a trend for the number of butterflies observed at several sites. In total, there are 66 sites, and 19 years for which observations might be available. However, only 326 observations are available (instead of 1254). For the time being, I ignore the large number of missing values, and the fact that GEE is only valid under MCAR. When I run the

Hello, I have a question about modelling via glm. I have a dataset (see dput) that looks like as if it where poisson distributed (actually I would appreciate that) but it isnt because mean unequals var. > mean (x) [1] 901.7827 > var (x) [1] 132439.3 Anyway, I tried to model it via poisson and quasipoisson. Actually, just to get an impression how glm works. But I dont know how to

Dear fellows, I'm trying to extract the AIC statistic from a GLM model with quasipoisson link. The formula I'm referring to is AIC = -2(maximum loglik) + 2df * phi with phi the overdispersion parameter, as reported in: Peng et al., Model choice in time series studies os air pollution and mortality. J R Stat Soc A, 2006; 162: pag 190. Unfortunately, the function logLik

Hello, I'm having an error when trying to fit the next GLM: >>model<-glm(response ~ CLONE_M + CLONE_F + HATCHING +(CLONE_M*CLONE_F) + (CLONE_M*HATCHING) + (CLONE_F*HATCHING) + (CLONE_M*CLONE_F*HATCHING), family=quasipoisson) >> anova(model, test="Chi") >Error in if (dispersion == 1) Inf else object$df.residual : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed If I fit

A question about the inner workings of glm() and dpois(): Suppose I call glm(y ~ x, family=poisson, weights = w) where y contains NON-INTEGER (but still nonnegative) values. (a) Does glm() still correctly maximise the weighted Poisson loglikelihood ? (i.e. the function given by the same formal expression as the weighted loglikelihood of independent Poisson variables Y_i except that the

Hi, I have a GAM quasipoisson that I'd like to run through MuMIn package - dredge - gettop.models - model.avg However, I'm having no luck with script from an example in MuMIn help file. In MuMIn help they advise "include only models with smooth OR linear term (but not both) for each variable". Their example is: # Example with gam models (based on

Hello R-helpers, I would like to calculate least square means after having built a GLM with quasipoisson errors. In my model the dependent variable is continuous, I have one continuous independent variable and one categorical independent variable (that is the variable for which I would like to calculate the least square means). I've looked around for the command to calculate the least

Hi Greg, For quasi families I've used extended quasi-likelihood (see Mccullagh and Nelder, Generalized Linear Models 2nd ed, section 9.6) in place of the likelihood/quasi-likelihood in the expression for the (RE)ML score. I hadn't realised that this was possible before the paper was published. best, Simon ps. sorry for slow reply, the original message slipped through my filter for

Hi, Got my issues sorted. Error message solved: I heard from the guy who developed MuMIn and his suggestion worked. "As for the error you get, it seems you are running an old version of MuMIn. Please update the package first." I did (I was only 1 version behind in both R and in MuMIn) and error disappeared! Running quasipoisson GAM in MuMIn: As for my questions on GAM and " to

Hey Buddy, Hope you have been doing well since last contact. If you have the answer to the following question, please let me know. If you have chance to travel up north. let me know. best, -Sean ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sean Zhang <seanecon@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:12 PM Subject: question related to fitting overdispersion count data using lmer

Hi, Please can someone tell me if this is correct for significance tests on count data; 1: If overdispersed, use quasipoisson, drop1(model, test="Chi"), 2: If not overdispersed, use (poisson or quasipoisson), drop1(model, test="Chi"). Thanks for your time, Martin. Martin Hoyle, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham,

Dear R-helpers: I have a question related to fitting overdispersed count data using lmer. Basically, I simulate an overdispsed data set by adding an observation-level normal random shock into exp(....+rnorm()). Then I fit a lmer quasipoisson model. The estimation results are very off (see model output of fit.lmer.over.quasi below). Can someone kindly explain to me what went wrong? Many thanks in