similar to: Vegan dataframe not acting nicely

#is there a way to get NA in the table of descriptive statistics instead of the function stopping Thank you in advance #data x.f <- structure(list(Site = structure(c(9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L, 9L), .Label = c("BC", "HC", "RM119", "RM148", "RM179", "RM185",

#copy and paste this into R f <- (structure(list(TKN = c(0.103011025, 0.018633208, 0.104235702, 0.074537363, 0.138286096), RM = c(215, 198, 148, 119, 61)), .Names = c("TKN", "RM"), class = "data.frame", row.names = 25:29)) plot(f$TKN~f$RM, type="b") I would like to reverse the X-Axis. How do I do this? -- Let's not spend our time and resources

Hi! I am using OpenSSH_3.6.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090701f on my Mandrake 9.1 machine. I used to run fetchmail to get emails from IRIX 6.3 system which has OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f. I had to reinstall my Mandrake, and after that ssh gives me strange error messages. When I run command: ssh -f -L 1234:irixhost.somedomain.fi:110

I ran a function called BoxCox, taken from the book by Venables and Ripley, for checking the need for power transformation. This function works fine using the version 0.50 of R, but gives an error message with version 0.60. The lm function in version 0.60 is different from that in version 0.50. Is there a bug in the new lm function? Kung-Sik Chan >

f <- (structure(list(X = structure(96:97, .Label = c("119DAmm", "119DN", "119DNN", "119DO", "119DOC", "119Flow", "119Nit", "119ON", "119OPhos", "119OrgP", "119Phos", "119TKN", "119TOC", "148DAmm", "148DN", "148DNN", "148DO",

Hi R experts, I'm attempting to run Linear Discriminant Analysis using the lda function in the MASS package. I've got around 50 predictor variables and one response variable. My response variable has 5 numeric categories that represent different clusters of fish abundance data (clusters were developed using Bray-Curtis and NMDS), and my predictor variables are environmental variables that

On 06/01/2016 02:06 PM, Felicia Lim wrote: > That was my intention with refactoring out the subframe encoding and > repacketizing bit. Or do you mean I should merge the explicit check for > 120 ms frame and the existing checks for 40/60 ms wideband? What I mean is that this line in opus_encoder.c: if (frame_size > st->Fs/50 && (st->mode == MODE_CELT_ONLY ||

Hello, I need nemenyi-test or any other post-hoc test for kruskal-wallis, but I just can't find out how to implement this in R. My data set is nitrite concentrations in four different groups which I intend to compare. The kruskal-wallis-test showed significance, but I still don't know between which groups these significances are. Can anybody help me with this? Thanks

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

Hi All, I am working on a bug in clang. I already have a fix for it and I am going through the "LLVM Testing Infrastructure Guide" to make sure I haven't broken anything else. I have few questions regarding the test suite infrastructure that I hope someone can answer. 1. I checked out and built llvm, clang, and test-suite from svn tip. When I run llvm/test *without* my changes on

Hello all, Consider the following problem: There is a matrix of probabilities: > set.seed(1) > probs <- array(abs(rnorm(25, sd = 0.33)), dim = c(5,5), dimnames = list(1:5, letters[1:5])) > probs a b c d e 1 0.21 0.27 0.50 0.0148 0.303 2 0.06 0.16 0.13 0.0053 0.258 3 0.28 0.24 0.21 0.3115 0.025 4 0.53 0.19 0.73 0.2710 0.656 5 0.11 0.10 0.37 0.1960

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

Target: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 on amd64. autoconf says: configure:2122: checking build system type configure:2140: result: x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.0 [...] configure:2721: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] [...] objdir != srcdir, for both llvm and gcc. Release

Hi Felica, yes, this is the only reason to have larger frames is on bandwidth limited links having a gross (physical) bit rates of 10kbps per channel. Decades ago I calculated with figure (for AMR-NB but the same holds for Opus). https://www.tkn.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/fg112/Hard_Software_Components/Software/hoene_07_2004_paper.pdf Von: Felicia Lim [mailto:flim at google.com]

Hi I would really appreciate some help with my code for coxme... My data set I'm interested in survival of animals after an experiment with 4 treatments, which was performed on males and females. I also have two random factors: Response variable: survival (death) Factor 1: treatment (4 levels) Factor 2: sex (male / female) Random effects 1: person nested within day (2 people did

On Jul 27, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Sundeep wrote: > Hi All, > > I am working on a bug in clang. I already have a fix for it and I am going > through the "LLVM Testing Infrastructure Guide" to make sure I haven't > broken anything else. I have few questions regarding the test suite > infrastructure that I hope someone can answer. > > 1. I checked out and built

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Here is a drop-in replacement for the R incomplete beta function. src/math/pbeta.c It is a slightly modified version of the cephes library one from Netlib. In the few cases I tried it seems to give at least 14 digit agreement with the one in S-PLUS (its hard to get more). I'm not sure what performance is like. I'd like to know if it helps with some of the problems which have been

Hi there, I've spent a while searching for ways of outputting table data from R in presentable formats, such as colored backgrounds for column headings, bold fonts etc. It appears that this is not possible, but I would be interested to learn if in fact there was a way of achieving this. Many thanks! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Nicely terminate the device model script, to let it properly clean resources. Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@eu.citrix.com> diff -u b/tools/python/xen/xend/image.py b/tools/python/xen/xend/image.py --- b/tools/python/xen/xend/image.py Fri Jan 18 11:53:23 2008 +0000 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/image.py Fri Jan 18 12:42:11 2008 +0000 @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ return