Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "functions"
2001 Apr 15
2
data manipulation in R
Dear List:
I have a data manipulation problem that I was unable
to solve in R. I did it in SQL, and it may be that
the solution in R is to do it in SQL, but I wondered
if people could imagine a vector-based solution.
Imagine a list A[i] of observers who observe some set
of events B[j]. Each observer i may observe one or
more events, and each event j may have been observed
by one or more
2001 Apr 24
1
New Package Released: PTAk
PTAk_1.1-1 ( Principal Tensor Analysis on k modes) has been released on
CRAN
A multiway method to decompose a tensor (array) of any
order,
as a generalisation of SVD also supporting non-identity
metrics and penalisations.
2-way SVD with these extensions is also available. The
package includes also some other multiway
methods: PCAn (Tucker-n) and
2001 Apr 24
1
New Package Released: PTAk
PTAk_1.1-1 ( Principal Tensor Analysis on k modes) has been released on
CRAN
A multiway method to decompose a tensor (array) of any
order,
as a generalisation of SVD also supporting non-identity
metrics and penalisations.
2-way SVD with these extensions is also available. The
package includes also some other multiway
methods: PCAn (Tucker-n) and
2010 Oct 13
5
Poisson Regression
Hello everyone,
I wanted to ask if there is an R-package to fit the following Poisson
regression model
log(\lambda_{ijk}) = \phi_{i} + \alpha_{j} + \beta_{k}
i=1,\cdots,N (subjects)
j=0,1 (two levels)
k=0,1 (two levels)
treating the \phi_{i} as nuinsance parameters.
Thank you very much
--
-Tony
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Sep 11
1
what am I missing
x<-seq(-1,1,length=10)
y<-seq(-1,1,length=10)
a<-matrix(c(1,2,2,1),2,2)
b<-matrix(c(2,1,1,2),2,2)
fv<-function(x,y) {
m<-x*a+y*b
t<-m[1,1]+m[2,2]; d<-m[1,1]*m[2,2]-m[1,2]^2
return((t-sqrt(t^2-4*d))/2)
}
gv<-function(x,y) {
t<-x*(a[1,1]+a[2,2])+y*(b[1,1]+b[2,2])
d<-(x*a[1,1]+y*b[1,1])*(x*a[2,2]+y*b[2,2])-(x*a[1,2]+y*b[1,2])^2
return((t-sqrt(t^2-4*d))/2)
}
2007 Feb 28
1
Efficient way to repeat rows (or columns) of a matrix?
Hi.
If I have a vector, v_1, and another vector of positive integers, i_1, the
same length as v_1, then rep(v_1,i_1) will repeat v_i[j] exactly i_1[j]
times, like so:
>rep(c(1,2,3),c(3,2,1))
[1] 1 1 1 2 2 3
>
I'd like to do the same sort of thing where I replace v_1 with a matrix, and
the jth row of the matrix is repeated i_1 times.
Obviously, I could do this with for loops, like
2011 Apr 14
1
Plotting an Underbrace in R
I need to include some mathematical expressions in a plot I am creating in
R, one of which requires an underbrace, which in LaTeX would be written like
\underbrace{T \cdots T}_{n times}
There does not appear to be a provision for this in plotmath, and I cannot
find anything on the topic in the R-help archive or in a Google search. I
would appreciate some help with this.
Michael P. McAssey,
2000 Jan 09
0
AW: Scanner for mail
----- Forwarded message from [Harald Kie_ling] -----
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
Scanner for mail
There are two possible mechanisms to protect email-users over a mail server
from a virus :
_ Hook into mail server and scanning the email
Nearly 90% gave me the advise to take AMAVIS and scan the mail with some
scanner.
_ Hook into the smpt-protocol like a fire-wall
Two
1999 Jun 07
2
smbmount Directory permissions
Hello,
I?m having trouble with smbmount & WinNT 4.0 SP 4 Workstation.
Mounting shares on NT from Linux as root is no problem, but
if I try to mount shares as a normal user, the directory I want
to mount the share, becomes gid root and cannot be accessed by
a normal user.
Is there any configuration to do for this like setting permissions
in smb.conf ?
Thanks in advance
Andreas Klein
---
2014 Sep 30
2
[LLVMdev] Behaviour of NVPTX intrinsic
I have written test.ll as below and ran 'opt' on it as
" opt -std-compile-opts test.ll -S -o -" . But the output shows that there
is code motion around the barrier intrinsics.
test.ll
-------
; ModuleID = 'test.bc'
define void @test(i16* %I_0, i16* %I_1, i16* %I_2, i16* %I_3, i16* %O_0) {
entry:
%T_0 = load volatile i16* %I_0
%T_1 = load volatile i16* %I_1
%T_2 =
2007 Feb 06
2
abbreviate dataframe for Sweave output
I wanted to print the first and last rows of some dataframes in Sweave
using dots in columns to separate the two parts. Head and tail almost
work, but I have problems with factors and row names.
z<-data.frame(id=letters[1:26], x=sample(1:26,26))
rbind(head(z,3), ".", tail(z,1))
id x
1 a 18
2 b 8
3 c 14
4 <NA> .
26 z 10
Warning message:
invalid
2010 Mar 18
5
language!!!
Hi,
there´s something that really bothers me about R and after hours and hours of internet research, I´m still stuck with the same problem: I installed R and it is in Spanish, as the system on my work. I would really like it in English and there seems to be no way to change that!?! I´m doing an abroad internship, so my Spanish is far from perfect and my tutorial is in English.
Is there any
2012 Oct 11
0
Ptak and Candpara
Hi,
I am using the package PTAK and in particular the command Candpara to
perform the Parafac factorizationor of a tensor.
The results are not encouraging as I expected, I'm starting a phase of
analysis to see if there are errors.
I pose a question and I hope you can help me.
The command to run the factorization is:
## CANDECOMP/PARAFAC
results<- CANDPARA(data_matrix, dim=3)
2006 Mar 12
2
Logic Error (PR#8677)
Full_Name: Matthew Davis
Version: 2.2.0
OS: OS X (10.4.5)
Submission from: (NULL) (209.107.120.195)
the mean of my sample x is 0.2, and when I check mean(x)<=0.2 I get a TRUE
value, when I check mean(x)<=(1-0.8) I get a FALSE value. (x <- c(0, 1, 0, 0,
0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0))
2011 Apr 20
4
[LLVMdev] GEP vs IntToPtr/PtrToInt
I have a question about when we should apply these pointer aliasing
rules. Do the rules tell us when a load/store is safe?
"Any memory access must be done through a pointer value associated
with an address range of the memory access, otherwise the behavior is
undefined."
So this means the conversion discussed here is still safe in terms of
memory safety, but its meaning after conversion
2011 Apr 20
0
[LLVMdev] GEP vs IntToPtr/PtrToInt
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> I have a question about when we should apply these pointer aliasing
> rules. Do the rules tell us when a load/store is safe?
> "Any memory access must be done through a pointer value associated
> with an address range of the memory access, otherwise the behavior is
> undefined."
>
2011 Apr 20
0
[LLVMdev] GEP vs IntToPtr/PtrToInt
On 4/20/11 10:08 AM, Jianzhou Zhao wrote:
> I have a question about when we should apply these pointer aliasing
> rules. Do the rules tell us when a load/store is safe?
> "Any memory access must be done through a pointer value associated
> with an address range of the memory access, otherwise the behavior is
> undefined."
I don't think the pointer aliasing rules
2008 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] Dependence Analysis [was: Flow-Sensitive AA]
> I asked myself the same question. Without mod, how do you ensure that for instance the expression 2*i+255 was not actually 2*i-1 ?
I think it is not possible in general, but I believe it is possible in
case of affine expressions used as GEP indices.
I assume, GEP indices (except indexing into struct) are interpreted as
signed integers. It isn't explicitly stated in the LangRef, but
2011 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] GEP vs IntToPtr/PtrToInt
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
>> I have a question about when we should apply these pointer aliasing
>> rules. Do the rules tell us when a load/store is safe?
>> "Any memory access must be done through a pointer value
2011 Apr 20
0
[LLVMdev] GEP vs IntToPtr/PtrToInt
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhou at seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
>>> I have a question about when we should apply these pointer aliasing
>>> rules. Do the rules tell