similar to: UNSOLITED E_MAILS: Integrate R data-analysis projects with Microsoft Office for free

Hi all, I'm trying to install the OOP package (http://www.omegahat.org/OOP) but having difficulty in resolving the errors generated during compilation. Googling doesn't seem to be giving much help. Can anyone please help. Below is the transcript of what I get from my command prompt. (I'm running on rw_2.0.0 WIN XP SP2 platform). Thanks in advance ---transcript---- Microsoft

Hello Everyone, In preparation for an upcoming talk, I would like to assemble a list of companies that provide consulting, services, products, or training for R. I am already aware of a number of such companies including (in alphabetical order): BlueReference <http://inference.us> Insightful <http://www.insightful.com> Metrum Institute <http://www.metruminstitute.org>

Ooops...I meant "formulations shouldn't be difficult" -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [R] Kernel Fisher Discriminant in R? Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:05:38 +0200 From: Gorden Jemwa <jemwa at sun.ac.za> To: huh at rti.org CC: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch You could us the kernlab package as a building block. Implementation of Kernel Fisher Discriminant Analysis

I'm still having difficulties with methods...is the following behavior expected? (This is without loading any libraries) R : Copyright 2003, The R Development Core Team Version 1.7.0 Under development (unstable) (2003-03-31) > ls() character(0) > > diag(2) [,1] [,2] [1,] 1 0 [2,] 0 1 > setGeneric("diag") [1] "diag" > diag(2) Error in

Dear members, I am wondering if there are any functions to perform the Kernel Fisher Discriminant method, especially for multi-class problems, in R. I would appreciate any kind of information on this. Thanks for your time. Seungho Huh, Ph.D. Research Statistician RTI International North Carolina, USA [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Suppose you have a class, say sex, for lack of a better example, and you are tempted, in defining the behavior of the call, is(x,"sex") to check whether certain basic features are satisfied, not to just trust the claim that x is specified to be of class "sex". `Without delving into details further sanity checking of the structure of the object is sometimes prudent to avoid

Hi list, I am planning a migration to virtual machines, and was considering with it to move from 1.4 to one of the later versions. My and my clients' 1.4 setups have been rock solid and I don't want to put myself into any unnecessary trouble. Those of you with solid experience with all these versions, what would you suggest? What new and exciting enhancements would newer versions bring

On Apr 23, 2008, at 10:49 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > > On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > >> Thank you both for your answers! >> That part of type inference was my second question. PHP uses a >> structure >> with a union to represent a variable (because a variable can have >> different >> types, like a long, a double, a stream,

On Apr 23, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > Thank you both for your answers! > That part of type inference was my second question. PHP uses a > structure > with a union to represent a variable (because a variable can have > different > types, like a long, a double, a stream, etc..), but often a single > variable > will only have one type throughout the program

On Aug 21, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Personally, I don't like the direction of making everything be redundantly specified with "let" clauses and in the patterns. I agree that it is a problem that we're not inferring from Pat<> patterns, and that not all instructions are expressible with patterns, but I'd rather we solve

Hello, I looked for R packages which focused on order-restricted statistical inference, but I could find only the isoreg() function. I would need to test whether the means in my (repeated measures) data follow a given order, e.g. A<B=C<D. I took a look at the monograph by Barlow et al. (1972) on this topic and found that for my case the null hypothesis is always A=B=C=D. This might be

SGTM On 02/17/2018 03:52 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > I can step in, if that's ok with you. > Nuno > > -----Original Message----- From: Philip Reames > Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 1:04 AM > To: Davide Italiano ; Nuno Lopes > Cc: llvm-dev > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Missing attribute inference cases > > Sure, but is anyone willing to mentor?  I don't have

Dear All, Slightly off -non technical topic ( but hey it is Friday) Following last week's interview with REvolution Computing which makes enterprise versions of R, here is another interview with the rapidly growing company Blue Reference CEOPaul van Eikeren at <http://www.decisionstats.com/2009/06/04/interview-inference-for-r/>

Chris Lattner wrote: > >> The issue I'm facing is object inheritance and how to find from a LLVM >> type what types it inherits. Currently this can't be implemented in LLVM >> and I need to implement a higher representation for types. >> > > Yep. Sorry :(. "Sorry", like "this can really not be integrated in LLVM" or like

I can step in, if that's ok with you. Nuno -----Original Message----- From: Philip Reames Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2018 1:04 AM To: Davide Italiano ; Nuno Lopes Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Missing attribute inference cases Sure, but is anyone willing to mentor? I don't have time. I can advise, but only infrequently. Philip On 02/16/2018 03:47 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:

Thank you both for your answers! That part of type inference was my second question. PHP uses a structure with a union to represent a variable (because a variable can have different types, like a long, a double, a stream, etc..), but often a single variable will only have one type throughout the program (e.g. iterating through $i in a loop). Will LLVM automagically see that we always use the

Hi Johannes, > All the use cases sound reasonable but why do we need these kind of "weird files" to do this? > > I mean, why would you train or measure something on single definition translation units and not on the original ones, potentially one function at a time? I think that's the fundamental question :) The short answer is that it is hard to compile the files from

Sure, but is anyone willing to mentor?  I don't have time.  I can advise, but only infrequently. Philip On 02/16/2018 03:47 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: > Yes, I agree with you this sounds like a great GSoC. > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Nuno Lopes via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Maybe we could list some of these as a GSoC project?

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: >> Yep. Sorry :(. > > "Sorry", like "this can really not be integrated in LLVM" or like "it is > possible but it requires a lot of work to integrate it"? :) it is not a desired feature for the LLVM type system itself. >> Depending on your application, you could read debug info, >> > >

On Aug 21, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: >> I don't understand what you're saying. Are you proposing that all properties (may load, store, side effects) be explicitly added to all instructions, and the pattern only be used to produce warnings? > > Yes. > > The side effect inference is worse than the load/store inference, but