similar to: ML Estimation Differences with R and SAS

Hi. guys, I am trying to write my own Stochastic Gradient Ascent for logistic regression in R. But it seems that I am having convergence problem. Am I doing anything wrong, or just the data is off? Here is my code in R - lbw <- read.table("http://www.biostat.jhsph.edu/~ririzarr/Teaching/754/lbw.dat" , header=TRUE) attach(lbw) lbw[1:2,] low age lwt race smoke ptl ht ui ftv

Hi, I would like to see if a matching variable is an effect-modifier in a conditional logistic regression. Naturally, the matching variable can't enter directly in the model but as an interaction with terms that are in. However, I have problems in formulating the correct model the term that's already in the model is a factor. I am using treatment contrasts and the problem is that if I

Hi, When I include a categorical variable (RACE with 3 levels - "white", "black" and "other") in my logistic regression model, the correlation matrix of the coefficients gets messed up. I get something like: ----------------------------------------- Correlation of Coefficients: ( A L RACEb AGE , 1 LWT , 1 RACEblack 1

Dear R list, I am reading in text file data prepared in Access database by someone. One of the field contains timestamp data, how can I separate the timestamp data into two varaibles: date and time. Can I specify the field is in timestamp format when I first reading in ? My reading in data are as below: 449 LWT 22/10/2003 15:43:00 441 143 449 LWT 17/11/2003 15:25:00 421 169 449 LWT

Dear R users, Thanks in advance. I am Deb, Statistician at NSW Department of Commerce, Sydney. I am using R 2.9.1 on Windows XP. This has reference to the package “MCMCpack”. My objective is to select a better model using various alternatives. I have provided here an example code from MCMCpack.pdf. The matrix of Bayes Factors is: model1 model2 model3 model1 1.000 14.08

Hello all I have what seems like a simple question but have not been able to find an answer on the forum. I'm trying to define a function which involves regression models and a large number of covariates. I would like the function to accept any number of covariates and, ideally, I would like to be able to enter the covariates in a group (e.g. as a list) rather than individually. Is there any

Support transparent huge page migration to ZONE_DEVICE private memory. A new flag (MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND) is added to the input PFN array to indicate the huge page was fully mapped by the CPU. Export prep_compound_page() so that device drivers can create huge device private pages after calling memremap_pages(). Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell at nvidia.com> ---

Support transparent huge page migration to ZONE_DEVICE private memory. A new selection flag (MIGRATE_VMA_SELECT_COMPOUND) is added to request THP migration. Otherwise, THPs are split when filling in the source PFN array. A new flag (MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND) is added to the source PFN array to indicate a huge page can be migrated. If the device driver can allocate a huge page, it sets the

Implement lazy MMU update hooks which are SMP safe for both direct and shadow page tables. The idea is that PTE updates and page invalidations while in lazy mode can be batched into a single hypercall. We use this in VMI for shadow page table synchronization, and it is a win. It also can be used by PPC and for direct page tables on Xen. For SMP, the enter / leave must happen under protection

On 19 Jun 2020, at 17:56, Ralph Campbell wrote: > Support transparent huge page migration to ZONE_DEVICE private memory. > A new flag (MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND) is added to the input PFN array to > indicate the huge page was fully mapped by the CPU. > Export prep_compound_page() so that device drivers can create huge > device private pages after calling memremap_pages(). > >

On 3/27/23 19:14, Alistair Popple wrote: > Device exclusive page table entries are used to prevent CPU access to > a page whilst it is being accessed from a device. Typically this is > used to implement atomic operations when the underlying bus does not > support atomic access. When a CPU thread encounters a device exclusive > entry it locks the page and restores the original entry

Device exclusive page table entries are used to prevent CPU access to a page whilst it is being accessed from a device. Typically this is used to implement atomic operations when the underlying bus does not support atomic access. When a CPU thread encounters a device exclusive entry it locks the page and restores the original entry after calling mmu notifiers to signal drivers that exclusive

Device exclusive page table entries are used to prevent CPU access to a page whilst it is being accessed from a device. Typically this is used to implement atomic operations when the underlying bus does not support atomic access. When a CPU thread encounters a device exclusive entry it locks the page and restores the original entry after calling mmu notifiers to signal drivers that exclusive

Hi, on a Nehalem system with VT-d enabled we are seeing strange ACPI-Table contents, especially a corrupted DMAR entry. The hypervisor shows following data on boot: (XEN) ACPI: RSDP 000F80E0, 0024 (r2 PTLTD ) (XEN) ACPI: XSDT BF7C469E, 00D4 (r1 PTLTD XSDT 60000 LTP 0) (XEN) ACPI: FACP BF7C9CC9, 00F4 (r3 FSC TYLERBRG 60000 PTL F4240) (XEN) ACPI: DSDT BF7C4772, 54D3 (r1

Dear friends, In R, the help of "bic.glm" tells the difference between postmean(the posterior mean of each coefficient from model averaging) and condpostmean(the posterior mean of each coefficient conditional on the variable being included in the model), But it's still unclear about the results explanations, and the artile of Rnews in 2005 on BMA still don't give more detail on

=============================================================================== PTL: Prism Technologies, Ltd. http://www.prism.net/secure Netmanage ZPOP v1.1 August 24, 1998 =============================================================================== http://www.prism.net/secure/advisory/PTL.092498.ZPOP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===

I''m getting this: blktap_validate_params: aio:/dev/vg_lilith-raid/xen-f13-64: capacity: 20971520, sector-size: 512 blktap_validate_params: aio:/dev/vg_lilith-raid/xen-f13-64: capacity: 20971520, sector-size: 512 blktap_device_create: minor 0 sectors 20971520 sector-size 512 blktap_device_create: creation of 253:0: 0 INFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs

The pagewalk code already passes the value as the hmask parameter. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- mm/hmm.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c index f26d6abc4ed2..88b77a4a6a1e 100644 --- a/mm/hmm.c +++ b/mm/hmm.c @@ -771,19 +771,16 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,

The pagewalk code already passes the value as the hmask parameter. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> --- mm/hmm.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c index f26d6abc4ed2..03d37e102e3b 100644 --- a/mm/hmm.c +++ b/mm/hmm.c @@ -771,19 +771,16 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:14:34PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote: > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -3623,8 +3623,19 @@ static vm_fault_t remove_device_exclusive_entry(struct vm_fault *vmf) > struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma; > struct mmu_notifier_range range; > > - if (!folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags)) > + /* > + * We need a page reference to