similar to: Problem training svm with columns having same values

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Problem training svm with columns having same values"

2008 Mar 07
2
training svm
What should I do if I need to train svm() with data having same value across all rows in some columns. These must be the important features of the class and we cant exclude these columns to build up models. The error I am getting is: Error in predict.svm(ret, xhold) : Model is empty! In addition: Warning message: In svm.default(datatrain, classtrain) : Variable(s) 'F112' and
2007 Feb 26
1
training svm
Hello. I'm new to R and I'm trying to solve a classification problem. I have a training dataset of about 40,000 rows and 50 columns. When I try to train support vector machine, it gives me this error after a few seconds: Error in predict.svm(ret, xhold) : Model is empty! This is the code I use: ne_span_data <- as.matrix(read.table('ne_span.data.R.txt', header=TRUE,
2011 Apr 04
1
Problem using svm.tune
Dear Sir, I am stuck with a nagging problem in using R for SVM regression. My data has 5 dimensions and 400 observations. The independent variables are : Peb, Ksub, Sub, and Xtt. The dependent variable is: Rexp. I tried using the svm.tune function as well as <_tune(svm.....), to tune the hyper parameters: gamma, epsilon and C. Since I am new to R, I am probably not using the svm.tune
2010 Dec 20
1
Error en modelo SVM
Hola a todos, estoy intentado entrenar un modelo SVM y me da con el valor de nu=0.1 el siguiente error Error en predict.svm(ret, xhold) : NA/NaN/Inf en llamada a una función externa (arg 8) Según varío el valor de nu a valores menores me da el mismo cuelgue. En cambio si uso valores mayores de nu el ordenador simplemente se cuelga ¿tendrá esto remedio? Uso la librería e1071 ¿existe alguna
2011 Apr 04
2
Please help
Dear Sir/Madam, I am stuck with a nagging problem in using R for SVM regression. My data has 5 dimensions and 400 observations. The independent variables are : Peb, Ksub, Sub, and Xtt. The dependent variable is: Rexp. I tried using the svm.tune function to tune the hyper parameters: gamma, epsilon and C. I am getting the following error message: Error in predict.svm(ret, xhold,
2007 Dec 27
1
(package e1071) SVM tune for best parameters: why they are different everytime i run?
Hi, I run the following tuning function for svm. It's very strange that every time i run this function, the best.parameters give different values. [A] >svm.tune <- tune(svm, train.x, train.y, validation.x=train.x, validation.y=train.y, ranges = list(gamma = 2^(-1:2), cost = 2^(-3:2))) # where train.x and train.y are matrix
2010 Apr 29
2
can not print probabilities in svm of e1071
> x <- train[,c( 2:18, 20:21, 24, 27:31)] > y <- train$out > > svm.pr <- svm(x, y, probability = TRUE, method="C-classification", kernel="radial", cost=bestc, gamma=bestg, cross=10) > > pred <- predict(svm.pr, valid[,c( 2:18, 20:21, 24, 27:31)], decision.values = TRUE, probability = TRUE) > attr(pred, "decision.values")[1:4,]
2011 Feb 18
1
segfault during example(svm)
If do: > library("e1071") > example(svm) I get: svm> data(iris) svm> attach(iris) svm> ## classification mode svm> # default with factor response: svm> model <- svm(Species ~ ., data = iris) svm> # alternatively the traditional interface: svm> x <- subset(iris, select = -Species) svm> y <- Species svm> model <- svm(x, y) svm>
2010 Apr 06
3
svm of e1071 package
Hello List, I am having a great trouble using svm function in e1071 package. I have 4gb of data that i want to use to train svm. I am using Amazon cloud, my Amazon Machine Image(AMI) has 34.2 GB of memory. my R process was killed several times when i tried to use 4GB of data for svm. Now I am using a subset of that data and it is only 1.4 GB. i remove all unnecessary objects before calling
2009 Jul 18
1
svm works but tune.svm give error
Hello, I'm using the e1071 library for SVM functions. I can quickly train an SVM with: svm(formula = label ~ ., data = testdata) That works well. I want to tune the parameters, so I tried: tune.svm(label ~ ., data=testdata[1:2000, ], gamma=10^(-6:3), cost=10^(1:2)) THIS FAILS WITH AN ERROR: 'names' attribute [199] must be the same length as the vector [184] I don't
2009 Mar 26
1
Extreme AIC in glm(), perfect separation, svm() tuning
Dear List, With regard to the question I previously raised, here is the result I obtained right now, brglm() does help, but there are two situations: 1) Classifiers with extremely high AIC (over 200), no perfect separation, coefficients converge. in this case, using brglm() does help! It stabilize the AIC, and the classification power is better. Code and output: (need to install package:
2010 Jun 29
2
Need help for SVM code for microarray classification
Hi I am Aadhithya I am trying to write a code to classify microarray data (AML and ALL) using SVM in R my code goes like this : library(e1071) train<-read.table("Z:/Documents/train.txt",header=T); test<-read.table("Z:/Documents/test.txt",header=T); cl <- c(c(rep("ALL",10), rep("AML",10))); model<- svm(train,cl); pred <-
2011 Sep 26
1
SVM accuracy question
Hi, I'm working with support vector machine for the classification purpose, and I have a problem about the accuracy of prediction. I divided my data set in train (1/3 of enteire data set) and test (2/3 of data set) using the "sample" function. Each time I perform the svm model I obtain different result, according with the result of the "sample" function. I would like
2004 Dec 21
2
Rgui.exe - Error while tuning svm
Hello, if I try to tune my svm with the code: Tune <- tune.svm(Data.Train, Class.Train, type="C-classification", kernel="radial", gamma = 2^(-1:1), cost = 2^(2:4)) i get a windows Messagebox with a error in the application "Rgui.exe" and the message: "Die Anweisung in 0x6c48174d verweist auf Speicher 0x00000000. Der Vorgang "read" konnte nicht auf
2008 Oct 12
1
svm models in a loop
I want to train svm models on increasingly large training data subsets of some zrr as follows: > m <- sapply(1:5,function(i) svm(person_oid~.,data=zrr[1:100*i,])) # (*) However, when I inspect m[1], it literally shows > m[1] [[1]] svm(formula = person_oid ~ ., data = zrr[1:N, ]) -- as opposed to > m1 <- svm(person_oid~.,data=zrr[1:100,]) > m1 > m1 Call:
2006 Feb 16
2
getting probabilities from SVM
I am using SVM to classify categorical data and I would like the probabilities instead of the classification. ?predict.svm says that its only enabled when you train the model with it enabled, so I did that, but it didn't work. I can't even get it to work with iris. The help file shows that probability = TRUE when training the model, but doesn't show an example. Then I try to
2010 May 13
1
tune svm
Hello, I hope you can help me! I`m trying to tune svm parameters: cost and gamma for a landsat image classification, but I get an error and I can't understand it. I write this: > tune(svm, Class~., data = mdt01bis, ranges = list(gamma = 2^(-15:3), cost > = 2^(-5:15))) and R gives: Error en predict.svm(model, if (!is.null(validation.x)) validation.x else if (useFormula)
2010 Jan 06
1
svm
Hi, I understand from help pages that in order to use a data set with svm, I have to divide it into two files: one for the dataset without the class label and the other file contains the class label as the following code:- library(e1071) x<- read.delim("mydataset_except-class-label.txt") y<- read.delim("mydataset_class-labell.txt") model <- svm(x, y, cross=5)
2009 Nov 17
2
SVM Param Tuning with using SNOW package
Hello, Is the first time I am using SNOW package and I am trying to tune the cost parameter for a linear SVM, where the cost (variable cost1) takes 10 values between 0.5 and 30. I have a large dataset and a pc which is not very powerful, so I need to tune the parameters using both CPUs of the pc. Somehow I cannot manage to do it. It seems that both CPUs are fitting the model for the same values
2006 Mar 30
1
Predict function for 'newdata' of different dimension in svm
I am using the "predict" function on a support vector machine (svm) object, and I don't understand why I can't predict on a dataset with more observations than the training dataset. I think this problem is a generic "predict" problem, but I'm not sure. The original svm was fit on 50 observations.