similar to: Set without argument

Hello, I'm using R code that includes a residual permutation that was written as a supplement to the paper: Turner et al. 2010. A general hypothesis-testing framework for stable isotopes ratios in ecological studies. Ecology 91:2227-2233. The supplemental code is available at: http://www.esapubs.org/archive/ecol/E091/157/suppl-1.htm When I execute the function, no warnings are given

Hi the list, I am writing a package in S4 and I do not manage to understand a bug. The "R CMD check" and the "R CMD build" both work. Here is links to the package (not on CRAN yet for the raison that I explain bellow): http://christophe.genolini.free.fr/aTelecharger/kml_0.5.zip http://christophe.genolini.free.fr/aTelecharger/kml_0.5.tar.gz Then I install the package and I

Hi the list, One of my package has a memory issue that I do not manage to understand. The Memtest notes is here: <http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/memtests/valgrind/kml-Ex.Rout> Here is the message that I get from Memtest --- 8< ---------------- ~ Fast KmL ~ ==27283== Invalid read of size 4 ==27283== at 0x10C5DF28: kml1 (kml.c:183) ... ==27283== by 0x10C5DE4F: kml1 (kml.c:151)

On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 18:07 +0100, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > On 14 April 2016 at 13:37, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs > > Checking 4079 objects > > MYOBJ=value,OU=myou,DC=mydomain,DC=org,DC=uk: 0x00290001 > > MYOBJ=value,OU=myou,DC=mydomain,DC=org,DC=uk: 0x0029000a > >

Dear all, I'm trying to use the Pspline add-on package to fit a quintic spline (norder =3), but I keep running into a Singularity error. > traj.spl <- smooth.Pspline(time, x, norder=3 ) Error in smooth.Pspline(time, x, norder = 3) : Singularity error in solving equations > Playing around with the other parameters produces an "unused arguments" error: > traj.spl

Thank you, Andrew - I hadn't done so. (In a good way, I haven't yet had problems with samba that have caused me to delve quite so deeply into the DB :) so I'm not as familiar with the range of tools as I could be, sorry!) This has flagged up quite a few errors, all along the lines of: # samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 4079 objects MYOBJ=value,OU=myou,DC=mydomain,DC=org,DC=uk:

Hi there, I''d like to choose between an "static" and "dynamic" access of a reference class field, say ''a''. myObj <- getRefClass("Blabla")$new() Static: myObj$a Dynamic: myObj$a.get() where the function retrieves the data from a database (or some other location), stores it to a buffer and

Sorry in advance if this is too simple a question, but I'm stuck with some odd behavior and I can't find the text to rid myself of this (admittedly somewhat trivial) problem. Note that I've done generic programming with S3 "objects" in the past, but I've never really dabbled in creating S4 objects until now. So, I've created a new S4 class, call it

Hi all, Could you please help me? I am having the following weird problem when debugging R programs using "browser()": In my function, I've inserted a "browser()" in front of Step 1. My function has 3 steps and at the end of each step, it will print out the message "Step i is done"... However, after I hit <ENTER> when the program stopped before Step 1

Hi the list. I try to learn the S4 programming. I find the wiki and several doc. But I still have few questions... 1. To define 'representation', we can use two syntax : - representation=list(temps = 'numeric',traj = 'matrix') - representation(temps = 'numeric',traj = 'matrix') Is there any difference ? 2. 'validityMethod' check the

Hi all, I have the following problem: I have a csv-file consisting of timestamp values (no dates), e.g.: Timestamp1;Timestamp2; 05:24:43;05:25:05; 15:47:02;15:47:22; 18:36:05;18:36:24; 15:21:24;15:22:04; I need a vector with the difference of the two timestamps, so I read the data with the read.csv-function: myObj <- read.csv("file.csv",header=TRUE,sep=";"). I have then

Hi the list, I build a package. They was a mistake in it, but R CMD check did not find it. Is that normal ? Here is what Kurt gets (which is right, I did this mistake): --- 8< ---------------- * checking for code/documentation mismatches ... WARNING S4 class codoc mismatches from documentation object 'LongData-class': Slots for class 'LongData' Code: id other time traj

Hello everyone, I'm working on a package using S4 classes and methods and I ran into the following "problem" when I tried to create an "apply" method for objects of one of my new classes. I've found a way around the problem but I wonder if I did not paint myself into the corner. I'd like your opinion about that. So I have an object "myObj" of class

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 00:32 +0100, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Thank you Andrew, really appreciated. > > I have now run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix' and it has > successfully fixed some errors; there were 110 previously, however > there are still 69 remaining after a second pass of dbcheck --fix. > > The remaining errors seem to be mainly of this form: >

Hi all, Can anyone help me understand why an implicit print (i.e. just typing df at the console), is so much slower than an explicit print (i.e. print(df)) in the example below? I see the difference in both Rstudio and in a terminal. # Construct large df as quickly as possible dummy <- 1:18e6 df <- lapply(1:10, function(x) dummy) names(df) <- letters[1:10] class(df) <-

Hi, I'm developing in S4 and I wanted to see the methods for a specific class using showMethods but I didn't succed. Can someone help ? See the example below. setClass("myclass", representation( name ="character" ) ) setGeneric("mymeth", function(obj, ...){ standardGeneric("mymeth") } ) setMethod("mymeth",

Hi! Like to write quite a lot (ca 100) of objects from my envirovment with save. The names of the objects are in a list nam. nam<-dir() nam<-grep("E",nam,value=T) length(nam) 20 for(x in nam) { #reads the objects and assigns the names. assign(x,simFromEmboss(Simmatrix(),x)) nnam<-paste(x,".rda",sep="") print(nnam) save(x,file=nnam) } I knew that

Hello, That is my first post here and I'd like to thanks everybody in advance. I am writing a package with some R functions and try to submit it to CRAN. After build and check the package a number of times, I am struggling with the fact that the CRAN people responsible for checking packages are replying me with some mistakes that I just do NOT get when I do the check in my computer. With the

Hi all, There is a compatibility issue between the package 'lme4' and my package 'kml'. I define the "[" operator. It works just fine in my package (1). If I try to use the lme4 package, then it does no longer work (2). Moreover, it has some kind of strange behavior (3). Do you know what is wrong? Any idea of how I can correct that? Thanks for your help Christophe ---

Thank you Andrew, really appreciated. I have now run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix' and it has successfully fixed some errors; there were 110 previously, however there are still 69 remaining after a second pass of dbcheck --fix. The remaining errors seem to be mainly of this form: ERROR: duplicate attributeID values for myattrib in replPropertyMetaData on