similar to: Finding local maxima (height) in a matrix data (6 spatial coordinates)?

Dear all, I wonder which R algorithm could perform a mountain clustering in an spatial grid, in other words, having the coordinates of a map (x,y ... or even more) and then the altitude/height at each point I would like to localise the peaks of that topological surface. Which R algorithm can perform this? I see it as a clustering problem where the peak should be at the center of each cluster.

Dear All, I'd like to use Weka functions that are not implemented (do not have interface) in RWeka, like the Remove function and others in the future! The .java() functionality is for that purpose but I haven't seen any example with Weka functions. Could anyone give me hand in how to do it? For instace if I want to use the weka.filters.unsupervised.attribute.Remove? 1. in the R console,

R experts, I have three columns. c1 and c2 are numeric variables whereas c3 are the clusters classes (nominal variable, 10 different: cluster1, cluster2, cluster3, cluster4, cluster5 ....). I'd like to plot c1 against c2 (easy!) in a 2D plot and put different color depending to the cluster class automatically regardless the number of clusters. Could anyone give a hand? Josep Maria, matrix

Hello, I'm aware that recently there has been discussion of R joining forces with an algebra system in some way. Here is my $0.02. I suggest linking R with Maxima (http://maxima.sf.net). Maxima is written in Lisp. Maxima objects are pretty simple. Maxima works on expressions, and almost every expression is a Lisp list of the form ((op) arg1 arg2 arg3 ...) which associates an operator and

Hi I have a large dataset which follows a multimodal distribution. And I would like to identify the maxima. As the data is obtained from a stochastic simulation, not all maxima in the data are "real maxima of the dirstribution" but rather small random fluctuations. Unfortunately, it is not possible for me to run more simulations to smooth the obtained distribution. What I am doing

Dear all, suppose I have a bi-variate function f(x,y), I want to find the maxima. I define x and y vector, and get matrix z=f(x,y). how can I get which (x0,y0) makes z become the maxima? I can do two loops to get the x0 and y0, but I think there may exist a function to do this.

> On 26 Aug 2017, at 16:39, niharika singhal <niharikasinghal1990 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for your mail, and time > > It is not working for some arguments, when mean value is like >6. > > > case > > mc0 <- c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0. > 1134463,0.2074027) > > rv

I''m looking to write a javascript heavy clientside program with a something serverside backend that connects to the free maxima math program. I have extensive knowledge of ruby on rails, so I would prefer to call Maxima with ruby, but I don''t know if this is even possible. Its fairly easy to call Maxima (with a lisp implementation) using ANSI C, it is a little less easy to

Hi there, I use the surf.gls() function to fit a variable measured over a surface. When I plot the predicted surface, there are local minima/maxima in almost every coordinate where data were measured, which seems aberrant. For instance: ?? x <- c(343,293,343,243,293,343,443,543,593,243,293,343,393,443,493,543,593,143,193,243,293,343,393,443,

Dear Niharika, As I said before, the problem is basically an optimization issue. You should isolate the problematic part from the rest of your study. Sometimes, more information does not help to solution. All the answers from us (Ulrik, David, me) are more or less are correct to find a maximum point. Newton?s method is also correct. But after answers, you only say, it didn?t find the right

I have not followed the history of this thread, but I am quite flummoxed as to why the OP is rewriting code to estimate parameters from an univariate Gaussian mixture model when alternatives such as EMCluster (which generally appears to handle initialization better than MClust) exist. Or perhaps there is more to it in which case I apologize. But I thought that I would make the OP aware of the

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: niharika singhal <niharikasinghal1990 at gmail.com> Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Find maxima of a function To: "David Winsemius [via R]" <ml+s789695n4745009h56 at n4.nabble.com>, "Ismail SEZEN [via R]" <ml+s789695n4744993h60 at n4.nabble.com>, Ulrik Stervbo <ulrik.stervbo at gmail.com>

Dear community, I'd like to build a PLS plot with scores and loadings, sometimes called "biplot". Like in biplot.mvr {pls} but using ggplot2. 1. Scores plot. No problem! ggplot(data=data1,aes(x=plsr1,y=plsr2))+geom_point(aes(colour=solenergy,shape=type))+geom_text(aes(label=res,size=1,hjust=0,vjust=0)) where, > str(data1) 'data.frame': 295 obs. of 5 variables: $

If a run a LOESS model and then produce a smoothed surface: Is there any way to determine the coordinates of the local maxima on the surface? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Please keep the list in cc. Sorry, it didn't work as expected. Maybe someone else have an appropriate solution. Best, Ulrik On Sa., 26. Aug. 2017, 12:57 niharika singhal <niharikasinghal1990 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for you mail, > I really appreciate your time on my problem > > I have posted this problem on > > >

I have a Gaussian mixture model with some parameters mean=(506.8644,672.8448,829.902) sigma=(61.02859,9.149168,74.84682) c=(0.1241933, 0.6329082, 0.2428986) And the plot look something like below.[image: enter image description here] <https://i.stack.imgur.com/4uUQ9.png> Also, if I change my parameters to mean=(2.15,2.0,2.9) sigma=(0.1,0.1,0.1) c=(1/3,1/3,1/3) Then plot would change

I have data in the form of (x,y) pairs and would like to find local minima and maxima (typically the zeros of the 2nd derivative) of the y values. I looked at numericDeriv, but I don't have an "expression" per se. I looked at optim, also, but it looks like it will find only one "global" max or min. I can code up my own piecewise derivatives, but wondered if there is

Hi. Suppose I have a vector that I partition into disjoint, contiguous subvectors. For example, let v = c(1,4,2,6,7,5), partition it into three subvectors, v1 = v[1:3], v2 = v[4], v3 = v[5:6]. I want to find the maximum element of each subvector. In this example, max(v1) is 4, max(v2) is 6, max(v3) is 7. If I knew that the successive subvector maxima would never decrease, as in the example,

Hi, Thanks for your mail, and time It is not working for some arguments, when mean value is like >6. case mc0 <- c(0.08844446,0.1744455,0.1379778,0.1209769,0.1573065,0. 1134463,0.2074027) rv <-UnivarMixingDistribution(Norm(486.4255, 53.24133), Norm(664.0713, 3.674773), Norm(669.0484, 4.101381),

Is there any R package that can help me with digging out the maxima of a 1-D trajectory ? I have 975 1-D curves. They are only known as time series. That is a set of points ordered with respect to time. Some curves exhibit one only peak. Others have two peaks of different height. We wish to find the number of peaks and their position along the time axis. Apparently it's a trivial problem