similar to: gcc 4.3 any known issues?

correction samba-dc still doesn't come with samba-tool On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to start testing this? I saw a few months back Alexander > Bokovoy Released a build for F23 and I started using that. Now that F24 > is out I have to look for a way to upgrade. Is there a build for rawhide > with this?

On Fri, 2019-07-05T08:04-0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 7/4/19 1:38 PM, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > In filter/nozero a 64M large, static, zeroed, read-only array is declared. > > The new behavior of GCC puts this array as-is into the binary inflating the > > size by a factor of around 10000. > > Odd that you are only seeing this for the nozero filter, since we also >

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 06:43:37 -0600 > Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Bind-9.11 is installed. How do you configure it? Does it need anything > > special in the config for samba to build the ...samba.../named.conf > > file that I should be able

In /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/sambadns.py Update: It is failing in create_samdb_copy specifically here: # Copy root, config, schema partitions (and any other if any) # Since samdb is open in the current process, copy them in a child process try: tdb_copy(os.path.join(private_dir, "sam.ldb"), os.path.join(dns_dir,

Dear Folks, Now trying to get Samba 3.0.0 RC1 up and running only with LDAP, as PDC. I am using openldap 2.1.22-5 from rawhide on RH9. pbedit was able to migrate the user accounts to the existing posixAcounts in LDAP (nice!) but not the machine accounts, which had no pre-existing entries beyond the top-level entry ou=Devices. Since the sambaSamAccount is auxiliary, it needs a structural

OK so I don't have a program tdbbackup. Where do I get it? On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> In /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/sambadns.py >> >> Update: It is failing in

Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha scritto: > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote > ... > > > > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have > > packages > > for RHEL6/Centos6 only, not for RHEL7/Centos7 or any Fedora > > versions, > > at least this. >

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Hi List, >> >> I do my best to ask my question in english. ;-) >> >> Samba4 integrated heimdal kerberos to do the kerberos work for >> Active Directory. Some Linux Distributions like fedora/RedHat and >>

Hi, I'm a fedora user and I didn't know about your great project (shame on me). Only project I head about before that tried to do that you are doing is gnash. I'm testing fedora rawhide (development verision - soon to be Fedora 9). Rawhide currently uses Firefox 3 and swfdec installed by default - that is how I got to know about your project. Current version in rawhide is

Attempting to build OpenOffice 2 on CentOS 4 from rawhide (future FC5) SRPM. The spec file has EL4 target (which is nice), and I got almost all dependencies in place (mostly from 4.2beta and some from rawhide). However, I'm missing the ant package. Ant from rawhide doesn't compile since it is already gcc 4 based (fails on dependencies, getting it to use gcc4 instead of gcc seems like

Running virt-builder in a guest Fedora-20 guest hypervisor w/ Rawhide Kernel, throws the below: $ virt-builder fedora-20 --format qcow2 --size 20G virt-builder: symbol lookup error: /lib64/libgnutls.so.28: undefined symbol: nettle_secp_256r1 Version on L1 (guest hypervisor) -------------------------------- $ uname -r; rpm -q libvirt-daemon-kvm qemu-system-x86 \ libguestfs gnutls

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 4:33 PM Jos? Mar?a Terry Jim?nez <jtj at tssystems.net> wrote: > El 13/1/23 a las 18:50, Kaushal Shriyan escribi?: > > Hi, > > > > # cat /etc/redhat-release > > CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) > > #virt-install --version > > 1.5.0 > > # > > > > # ls -l /var/lib/libvirt/isos/ > > total 8302356 >

hi, is this rpms differ from redhat's rawhide 2.4.5 kernel which seems to contain ext3. so my question that your rpm contain different ext3 than rh's rpm? or I can simple use rh's rawhide rpms? thanks. yours. ps. please reply to my private address to since I'm not on the list. thanks. > Hi, > > Mostly for my own use, I prepared two kernel RPM's with Ext3 in them.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ovirt_Node_Spin I noticed that virt-manager-tui is in rawhide finally, but the package name implies that it's not going to be in f16? virt-manager-tui.noarch 0.9.0-4.fc17 rawhide Cole, is this intentional or just smth that we need to follow up on? Also, I've noticed that ovirt-node needs refreshing... iirc apevec did tag/release of 2.0.1 from

Hello all, I am having an issue with guestmount in respect to live instances and I was hoping someone might have an idea where I've gone wrong. The following output is from my shell session, if there's any more information needed please let me know and I'll happily provide it. [root at longitude ~]# virt-filesystems -d F16-rawhide/dev/sda2 /dev/sda3 [root at longitude ~]#

On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.44.14 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote: > Oh, and maybe in this process we could add to all packages the > requirement on R(ABI) = 4 that Tom implemented. For that we need to start with rawhide and then change the R-rpm-macros package. Probably it should be enough to change the /usr/lib/rpm/R-deps.R script to add Requires: R(ABI)=4.0 I suggest to continue this as is

updating Fedora-rawhide this morning I see 4.5.0rc1 has arrived. And still no samba-tool so I looked at installing from source with dnf download --source samba rpm -i samba*src.rpm looking at the spec file I see a section %if ! %with_dc --without-ad-dc \ %endif How do I tell rpmbuild with_dc? On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:27 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote:

Il giorno ven, 11/09/2015 alle 14.25 +0200, Oscar Osta Pueyo ha scritto: > Hello, > > On 11 September 2015 at 14:04, Dario Lesca <d.lesca at solinos.it> > wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha > > scritto: > > > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> > > > wrote >

Did you already try current Centos? If yes what was the problem? Why it did not work? On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 08:38:14PM +0200, wwp wrote: > > Say, instead of stable, something not rawhide. But I'll examine all > > options that do work, so let's forget about "stable". > >

Hi OpenSSH mailing list, I would like to announce the newly introduced patch in Fedora rawhide [0] for FIPS compliance efforts. The change will be introduced in an upcoming RHEL 9 version. The patch targets OpenSSL support of OpenSSH, specifically the usage of old low level API. The new OpenSSL version 3.0 introduces a FIPS module (going through FIPS 140-2 validation and to be FIPS 140-3