similar to: multiple functions with three dots

I'm trying to redo an old plot with: > sessionInfo() R version 2.11.0 Under development (unstable) (2010-02-09 r51113) x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0 When I do: pdf("lty.pdf",height = 6, width = 8) u <- 1:100/100 y <- matrix(rep(1:10,each = 100),100) matplot(u,y,lwd = 2,type ="l") dev.off() the line types that have dots are difficult to distinguish because the

Hello, everyone! The code below allows me to produce the graph I want (I know - the colors are strange, but it's just for the sake of an example). After you run the plot<- part and then do print(plot) - that's what I want. However, when I run the bits of code below (with graphics devices) - what they print is different from the original plot. In .png, .emf, and .tiff - my dots change

Dear all, I am fairly new to package Plotrix and I would like to ask you, if any of you could help me with following. a) I don't know how to set up border line width in the Stackpoly function (seems that lwd from par doesn't work, or at least not in the way I have written) b) I don't know, how to rotate the x axis labels (I used srt=45, but same problem as before). c) Could anyone

Dear list users How is it possible to visualise both a linear trend line and a quadratic trend line on a plot of two variables? Here my almost working exsample. data(Duncan) attach(Duncan) plot(prestige ~ income) abline(lm(prestige ~ income), col=2, lwd=2) Now I would like to add yet another trend line, but this time a quadratic one. So I have two trend lines. One linear trend line

dear all, a simple question, I need to write a function in which I retrive an undetermined number of vector in the function. I solved the problem thanks to this link http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2540232/how-to-allow-multiple-inputs-from-user-using-r so my function will look alike this my_fun <- function(...){ my_list <- lapply(..., function(x){x}) } I need just one more

I forgot to write that the dots start to appear only inside "Desktop Environment" (in my case Gnome), not for example in grub/bios. Today I tried to install ubuntu 16.04 and the green dots appeared there too (in Unity). On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 12:50 AM, vychytraly . <vychytraly at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello friends, > > about 2 days ago, unexpected strange green dots

Dear List, I'm currently investigating if the argument dispatch mechanism based on `...` could somehow be "generalized" to scenarios that involve `r` recipients located across `c` calling stack layers *and* combined with the S4 method mechanism (for those interested see

When writing generic functions, should "..." arguments be routinely used? The Writing R Extensions manual says that if it is used, all descendant methods must use it too. In most cases in the R library source, the generic has the dots, often documented as parameters for the descendants (e.g. profile does this). In the case of profile, the descendants declare the dots, but don't

I have "hide dot files" on, but I have noticed that while files with a single dot are hidden, files with multiple dots are not: ".foo" - hidden "...foo" - not hidden Is this by design? *nix certainly hide such files by default... -- Barry -- http://barrkel.blogspot.com/

Dear all, I want to make three plot below to only one plot together with legend, how can I do that? I have tried with matplot function but I did not succeed. Thanks for your help. Sincerelly, Jan Sabee test.five.x <- c(0.02,0.05,0.07,0.09,0.10,0.12,0.13,0.14,0.16,0.17,0.20,0.21,0.34,0.40) test.five.y <- c(18,12,17,12,3,15,1,5,1,1,3,10,15,10) plot(test.five.x, test.five.y,

Hi Gabriel, and thanks for answering. I'm basically just trying to find a way to use the power of `...` in more complex scenarios and I'm well aware that this might not be the best approach ;-) Regarding your actual question: "Are you suggesting methods be dispatched based on the *contents* of ... [...]?" Yes, I guess currently I kind of do - but not on the argument *names*

Hi, How does one change the dot for the median in a boxplot drawn using lattice? I have been looking at > names(trellis.par.get()) [1] "grid.pars" "fontsize" "background" [4] "panel.background" "clip" "add.line" [7] "add.text" "plot.polygon"

Dear People, In a qqplot I am doing, I get lines/points that are very thick. I've tried setting the lwd variable to 0.1, but it doesn't seem to have any effect. Also, I have set the value of lty to dashed, but I still get dots. The command looks like qqplot(cdf.inv(seq(0,1,length=size),theta,pos,len),empmargdistvec(len,theta,pos,size), xlim=c(-theta,theta), ylim=c(-theta,theta),

I know that by setting alpha to for example col = rgb(0, 0, 0, 0.1) it is possible to see how many overlapping is in the plot. But disadvantage of it is that single points are barely visible on the background. So I wonder if there is possible to make setting that single points would be almost black, but with more and more data on the same spot it would get more and more whiteish. Or maybe it is

Janko, I'm not entirely sure I understand your proposal. Are you suggesting methods be dispatched based on the *contents* of ... (ie which arguments are in there)? This seems like it would be pretty different from how dispatch behaves now, which is entirely class based. Even the dispatching based on ... via dots methods is class based, having nothing to do AFAIK with the argument names. From

Dear Rs I have a 3x3 multiple plot. I would like to have a overall legend in the outer right margin. From the help archive, I found that it can be done by setting par(xpd=NA). However, I couldn't find the correct values for x and y co-ordinates for the legend. Please find the code snippet below: par(mfrow=c(3,3), mar=c(4,4,0.9,0.5), oma=c(1,2,2,4),cex.main=1.1)

I propose to add a function that allows to display colors selected by a text pattern or by color vectors in a plot. Wolfram Fischer #--- showcolors.R showcolors <- function( col = "red" , index = NULL , pie = TRUE , lwd = 6 , cex = 1.0 , main = NULL , sub = NULL , ... ){ n.colors <- length( col ) if( n.colors > 1 ){ main <- deparse( substitute( col ) )

Well, the benefit lies in the ability to pass along arguments via `...` to more than one recipient that use *identical argument names* and/or when these recipients are not necessarily located on the same calling stack layer. I'm *not* after a *general* change in the way arguments are dispatched/functions are called as I'm actually a big friend of keepings things quite explicit (thus

Hi, I am trying to write a function which defines some arguments, then uses those arguments as arguments of other function calls. It's a bit tricky to explain, so a simple example will have to suffice. I imagine this has a simple solution, but perusing through environments and other help lists has not helped. Suppose I have two functions: f1 = function(a) {     b = a + 1     b } f2 =

dear all, I want to plot a kaplan Meier plot with the following functions, but I fail to produce the plot I want: library(survival) tim <- (1:50)/6 ind <- runif(50) ind[ind > 0.5] <- 1; ind[ind < 0.5] <- 0; MS <- runif(50) pred <- vector() pred[MS < 0.3] <- 0; pred[MS >= 0.3] <- 1 df <- as.data.frame(cbind(MS, tim, pred, ind)) names(df) <-