similar to: Poisson Maximum Likelihood Estimation

Hello, I am solving a set of ODEs using deSolve and have run into a problem I would appreciate some advice on. One of the parameters (m) in the ODEs changes between two states when one of the variables (D) crosses a threshold (D_T) for the first time in either direction. Additionally, when the variable crosses the threshold (either by increasing or decreasing), there is a time delay (delay)

Hello, I have defined 8 registers in registerinfo.td file in the following order: R_0, R_1, R_2, R_3, R_4, R_5, R_6, R_7 But the generated assembly code only uses 2 registers. How to enable it to use all 8? Also can i control the ordering like after R_0 can i use R_5 without changes in registerinfo.td? What changes are required here? either in scheduling or register allocation phases?

> On Apr 18, 2018, at 1:04 AM, Hannah Meredith <hrmeredith12 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I am solving a set of ODEs using deSolve and have run into a problem I > would appreciate some advice on. One of the parameters (m) in the ODEs > changes between two states when one of the variables (D) crosses a > threshold (D_T) for the first time in either direction.

I am using 32-bit R 3.1.2 on Windows 7. I recently conducted an `R CMD check --as-cran` on a recently-developed package and received only the 'New submission' note. Research on StackOverflow and on R-devel suggested this could be ignored. I also used devtools::build_win() and received no notes or warnings, other than the one mentioned previously. Lastly, I conducted an `R CMD check` with

I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon on. I run this same daemon on many other systems without any incident. On this one system the daemon seems to die or be killed every day around 3:30am. There is nothing it its log or any system logs that tell me why it dies. However in /var/log/messages every day I see something like this: May 10 03:35:58 localhost pure-ftpd: (tool at

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Am 10.05.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Larry Martell: >> >> I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon on. I >> run this same daemon on many other systems without any incident. On >> this one system the daemon seems to die or be killed every day around >> 3:30am.

Hi guys, Have the following problem computing vectors with pure vector algebra and end up reverting to recursion or for-looping. Function my_cumsum calculates a weighted average (W) of ratios (R), but only up to the given size/volume (v). Now I recurse into the vector (from left to right) with what you have left from the difference of volume minus current weight, and stop when the difference is

Hi, Zvi, I agree. In the context of targeting the KNL, however, I'm a bit concerned about the addressing, and specifically, the size of the resulting encoding: > vmovdqu32 zmm0, zmmword ptr [rax + c+401280] ;load b[401280] in > zmm0 > > vpaddd zmm1, zmm1, zmmword ptr [rax + b+401344] > ; zmm1<-zmm1+b[401344] The KNL can only

Hi Ahmed, >From what can be seen in the code snippet you provided, the reuse of XMM0 and XMM1 across loop-unroll instances does not inhibit instruction-level parallelism. Modern X86 processors use register renaming that can eliminate the dependencies in the instruction stream. In the example you provided, the processor should be able to identify the 2-vloads + vadd + vstore sequences as

Dear R users, how can I test, whether two correlations differ significantly. (I want to prove, that variables are correlated differently, depending on the group a person is in.) Greetings from Freiburg im Breisgau (Germany), Timo Stolz

Am 10.05.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Larry Martell: > I have a CentOS 7 system that I run a home grown python daemon on. I > run this same daemon on many other systems without any incident. On > this one system the daemon seems to die or be killed every day around > 3:30am. There is nothing it its log or any system logs that tell me > why it dies. However in /var/log/messages every day I

Thanks. I am fully aware of what aggregate() returnes, and I can post-process this into the form I want ? if the names are available. But for foo, the returned object is both different in structure and loses the name altogether: foo <- function(x) { c(mean = base::mean(x)) } str(aggregate(iris$Sepal.Length, by = list(iris$Species), FUN = foo)) ## 'data.frame': 3 obs. of 2 variables:

Dear all, Is there any method in R to find all possible nonnegative integer solutions to the linear equation with unit coefficients as follow: X1+X2+...+Xk=N Thank you, Amin Zollanvari

On 3 January 2015 at 13:49, Steven Ranney wrote: | I am using 32-bit R 3.1.2 on Windows 7. | | I recently conducted an `R CMD check --as-cran` on a recently-developed | package and received only the 'New submission' note. Research on | StackOverflow and on R-devel suggested this could be ignored. I also used | devtools::build_win() and received no notes or warnings, other than the one |

Hi Well, I think the title says it all!? I've looked through the documentation but I can't find a way of doing this.? The situation is that I have 4 series, say a, b, c and d.? Series a and c are plotted on the lh y axis, series b and d are plotted on the rh (secondary) y axis.? I've worked out how to do this. However, I need to plot series a and b a points (symbols only, no line),

Hello, I've had no luck finding an R package that has the ability to estimate a Tobit model allowing for heteroskedasticity (multiplicative, for example). Am I missing something in survReg? Is there another package that I'm unaware of? Is there an add-on package that will test for heteroskedasticity? Thanks for your help. Cheers, Alan Spearot -- Alan Spearot Department of Economics

I have time-series data looking like this: > dataIn[sample(c(1:nrow(dataIn)), 25),] accelerometer_y id data_block_epoch_time 782 0.8424 201300 1331797330000 1868 0.3432 202386 1331797384000 1828 0.3510 202346 1331797382000 1026 0.2184 201544 1331797342000 1569 0.3432 202087 1331797369000 1453

HI, I've successfully compile 2.2.8 on Solaris (6,7,8) and Linux. However on Tru64-5.1 I get the following during the make: Compiling smbd/dfree.c Compiling smbd/dir.c smbd/dir.c:649:70: macro "stat" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 smbd/dir.c:716:13: macro "stat" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 make: *** [smbd/dir.o] Error 1 Any ideas? Ramon Kagan York

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++