similar to: How can I display an entire large output?

Karl, If you use one of the specialized packages to calculate your ICC, make sure that you know what you're getting. (I haven't checked the packages out myself, so I don't know either.) You might want to read David Futrell's article in the May 1995 issue of Quality Progress where he describes six different ways to calculate ICCs from the same data set, all with different

I have a quick statistical question and hoped somebody has a tip for me without me having to go to the local statistician on Monday. I assess 4 statements from 90 subjects. Each of the 4 statements receives one of three responses (say -1, 0, or 1). I can use Cramer's V or Spearman correlations to assess the correlation between each pair of statements, but I am looking for a measure of

It sounds as thought you are interested in Hoyt's Anova which is a form of generalizability theory. This is usually estimated using by getting the variance components from ANOVA. > -----Original Message----- > From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch > [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Karl Knoblick > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:10 AM > To: r-help at

Hi, all There are 62 samples in my data and I tested 3 times for each one, then I want to use ICC(intraclass correlation) from irr package to test the consistency among the tests. *combatexpdata_p[1:62] is the first text results and combatexpdata_p[63:124] * is the second one and *combatexpdata_p[125:186]* is the third. Here is the result:

I'm using the lme function in nmle to estimate the variance components of a fully nested two-level model: Y_ijk = mu + a_i + b_j(i) + e_k(j(i)) lme computes estimates of the variances for a, b, and e, call them v_a, v_b, and v_e, and I can use the intervals function to get confidence intervals. My understanding is that these intervals are probably not that robust plus I need intervals on the

Hello! I want to calculate the intra- and interrater reliability of my study. The design is very simple, 5 raters rated a diagnostic score 3 times for 19 patients. Are there methods/funtions in R? I only found packages to calculate interrater variability and intraclass correlation coefficients for matrices of n*m (n subjects, m raters) - I have n subjects, m raters and r repetitions. Can

Hi, Can R calculate an intraclass correlation coefficient for clustered data, when the outcome variable is dichotomous? By now I calculate it by hand, estimating between- and intracluster variance by one-way ANOVA - however I don't feel very comfortable about this, since the distributional assumptions are not really met.... Maybe anyone can help me? Best regards and many many thanks,

Hello dear R help group. I encountered this old thread (http://tinyurl.com/dklgsk) containing the a similar question to the one I have, but left without an answer. I am and hoping one of you might help. A simplified situation: I have a factorial design (with 2^3 experiment combinations), for 167 subjects, each one has answered the same question twice (out of a bunch of "types" of

Hi R Users, Hopefully a very simple solution, but I am stumped nevertheless. I am running glmer in which the output is too large so that not all the correlations are displayed. I expanded the max.print as recommended on this website. However, this still does not allow me to see the relevant information regarding the model fit (AIC etc), random and fixed effects. I have not been able to find

Hi, I'm trying to run a ICC calculation on a data frame. I get the following error message: Error in data.frame(x.s, subs = rep(paste("S", 1:n.obs, sep = ""), nj)) : arguments imply differing number of rows: 1700, 1750 I've looked at the data in the file and it seems to be okay. Any thoughts would be much appreciated. I'm getting used to R so if possible, I

Hello R users: I am fairly new to R and am trying to figure out how to compute an intraclass correlation (ICC) and/or design effect for binary data? More specifically, I am trying to determine the amount of clustering in a data set - that is, whether certain treatment programs tend to work with more or less severe clients. The outcome variable is dichotomous (low severity / high severity)

Hello dear R help group, I have the following setup to analyse: We have about 150 subjects, and for each subject we performed a pair of tests (under different conditions) 18 times. The 18 different conditions of the test are complementary, in such a way so that if we where to average over the tests (for each subject), we would get no correlation between the tests (between subjects). What we wish

I am fitting quantile regression models using data collected from a sample of 124 patients. When modeling cross-sectional associations, I have noticed that nonparametric bootstrap estimates of the variances of parameter estimates are much greater in magnitude than the empirical Huber estimates derived using summary.rq's "nid" option. The outcome variable is severely skewed, and I am

Given a square matrix of variables X, is there any way to compute a multivariable correlation among all the variables in the array? It is possible to calculate the correlation of all pairs of variables in the array, but I want to know the correlation of all the variables taken together, i.e. for the matrix X=x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 I don't want the pair-wise correlations

Hello, R-folks: Here is a statement I use to make a data frame: iccdata <- data.frame(i=rep(1:10,rep(2,10)),j=rep(1:2,10), x=c(0.35011,0.11989,0.13081,0.09919,0.16000,0.12000,0.00000,0.00000, 0.44023,0.32977,2.67081,2.63919,0.09050,0.03950,0.44019,0.30981,0.59000, 0.57000,4.03000,3.77000)) Then here are the data: > iccdata i j x 1 1 1 0.35011 2 1 2 0.11989 3 2 1 0.13081 4

Dear R-users, consider a 2-level linear mixed effects model (LME) with random intercept AND random slope for level 1 AND 2. Does anybody know how to calculate Intraclass-coefficient (ICC) for highest (innermost) level 2 ??? In the literature, I did not find an example for these kind of komplex models. For 1-level Random-Intercept models it would be easy: ICC = variance due to the clustering

I've installed R 1.8.1 on OSX 10.3 (Panther) using the RAqua.pkg and all indications were that the installation was successful. However, after double clicking the R icon in the Applications folder, nothing appears to happen. The following message appears on the console: Mac OS X Version 10.3 (Build 7B85) 2003-12-11 08:45:31 -0500 prefs written dyld:

I've installed R 1.8.1 on OSX 10.3 (Panther) using the RAqua.pkg and all indications were that the installation was successful. However, after double clicking the R icon in the Applications folder, nothing appears to happen. The following message appears on the console: Mac OS X Version 10.3 (Build 7B85) 2003-12-11 08:45:31 -0500 prefs written dyld:

Samba 4.8 (Louis debian repo), DM. Today i've had to recovery a deleted file in that share, that use 'vfs_recycle' modules: [Work] comment = Spazio di Lavoro Utente map acl inherit = Yes path = /srv/work read only = No store dos attributes = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle full_audit volume = Work full_audit:failure = none full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread

I've downloaded and installed R 1.9.0 under OS X 10.3.3. I then removed my previous R 1.8.0 installation by following the instructions in the readme file, e.g., 1. drag the "StartR" icon into the Trash; 2) go inside your Home directory and search for the Library folder. Inside the Library folder in your Home directory you'll find a RAqua directory: drag the RAqua